CASE SPOTLIGHTS
V KALANATHAN VEERAN v.
KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA (JPN) & ORS [2025] 8 CLJ 850
HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
SU TIANG JOO J
[ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: WA-31NCVC-3103-09-2024]
4 AUGUST 2025
In Malaysia, the logical and primary source of information on the details of the next of kin of a deceased person, would be the Registrar of Births and Deaths, a public officer appointed under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1957. The Registrar of Births and Deaths has a statutory duty to keep and maintain a sufficient number of registers for the recording of births, deaths and presumed deaths. Hence, in an application for discovery of the details of the family tree of a deceased person pursuant to O. 24 r. 7A of the Rules of Court 2012, the Registrar of Births and Deaths and the Registrar of Marriages from the National Registration Department should cooperate and facilitate the tracing of people with empathy to enable people to get on with their lives expeditiously and economically.
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Discovery - Application for - Discovery of details of family tree from National Registration Department ('NRD') - Application under O. 24 r. 7A, O. 62 r. 7 and/or O. 92 r. 4 of Rules of Court 2012 - Whether application may be made by any person - Essential elements for discovery - Whether satisfied - Whether documents sought will be ordered only if necessary - Whether NRD under statutory duty to supply information required - Whether discovery applied necessary for fair disposal of proceedings - Births and Deaths Registration Act 1957, ss. 6(1) & 31
APPEAL UPDATES
-
Sunway Reit Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri [2025] CLJU 636 overruling the High Court case of Sunway Reit Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri [2023] CLJU 809
-
Goh Choon Kim & Ors v. Chan Eng Leong & Ors [2025] CLJU 638 affirming the High Court case of Chan Eng Leong & Anor v. Goh Choon Kim & Ors [2024] CLJU 959
LATEST CASES
Legal Network Series
|
[2025] CLJU 116
|
ELAINE LEONG EE LING v. PENDAFTAR BESAR WARGANEGARA & ORS
The Registrar-General of the National Registration Department has a duty to keep and maintain an accurate register of births and issue birth certificates with correct information. Section 27(3) of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1957 allows amendments to be made on the register of births in the event of any factual or substantive error.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review - Certiorari - Application to quash decision of Registrar General of National Registration Department - Refusal to recognize status as Malaysian citizen - Status was changed from Malaysian citizen to non-citizen via issuance of new birth certificate - Applicant was born in a house in Johor and had been abandoned by her biological parents - Applicant was raised by her adoptive parents - Identity of biological parents unknown - Whether amendment to citizen status in birth certificate was tainted with error of law - Whether there were serious doubt as to identity of applicant's biological parents - Whether presumption under s. 19B of Part III of Second Schedule of Federal Constitution could be invoked - Whether applicant was able to establish that she was born not a citizen of any country - Whether requirement of jus sanguinis established
- For the plaintiffs - N Surendran, Shahid Adli, Kamaruddin, Khairun Nabila & Khairuddin; M/s Daim & Gamany
- For the defendant - Imtiyaz Wizni Aufa Osman, Federal Counsel, Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia
|
|
[2025] CLJU 117
|
PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN HATTEN SQUARE LOT 1348 v. TRIBUNAL PENGURUSAN STRATA PUTRAJAYA, WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN & ANOR
1. The Strata Management Act 2013 allows the joint management body, management corporation and sub-management corporation to determine charges for the purpose of the proper maintenance and management of the buildings. Where a resolution in respect of the maintenance charges or sinking fund was passed without objection during an annual general meeting, it is then inequitable for a proprietor later to seek to nullify the imposition of the said maintenance charges and sinking fund. As the rate of charges is determined in the annual general meeting, it is incumbent on the said proprietor to pay those charges, like other parcel owners.
2. The strata roll contains private and confidential information about all parcels. This document is only accessible to the developer and/or management corporation and not to an individual parcel owner. Since the strata roll is not a publicly available document, a parcel owner cannot demand an inspection of the said strata roll.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review - Certiorari - Management corporation's application to quash decision of strata management tribunal made in favour of proprietor - Imposition of different rates of maintenance charges and sinking fund contributions - Tribunal granted proprietor request to inspect strata roll - Whether tribunal had erred in nullifying imposition of different rates of maintenance charges and sinking fund contributions - Whether tribunal had erred in granting proprietor to request to inspect strata roll - Whether award given was beyond tribunal's jurisdiction
LAND LAW: Strata title - Management corporation - Imposition of different rates of maintenance charges and sinking fund contributions - Rates fixed by joint management body - Inspection of strata roll by proprietor - Whether it was incumbent upon proprietor to pay charges like other parcel owners - Whether it was inequitable for proprietor to seek to nullify resolution passed during meeting - Whether management corporation arbitrarily imposed rates of charges and contributing to sinking fund - Whether rates and charges were fair and just - Whether strata roll is a publicly available document
- For the plaintiffs - Lai Chee Hoe & Tan Jie Xin; M/s Chee Hoe & Association
- For the defendant - Mohan Sivasundram
|
|
[2025] CLJU 122
|
MCC OVERSEAS (M) SDN BHD v. DAMAI CITY SDN BHD
A non-reply to a solicitor's letter of demand, per se, does not mean that liability is accepted by the recipient in all cases. But it can and does have a bearing on the credibility of the defendant if he later raises defences to the said claim. A court is entitled to view the totality of the evidence, including the non-reply to a solicitor's letter of demand, to hold that there is no triable issue.
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Summary judgment - Triable issues - Settlement agreement - Breach of agreement - Claim for work done - Action by main contractor against developer - Whether there was a proper acknowledgement of a debt - Whether allegation of fraud and misrepresentation could raise a triable issue - Whether absence of police report undermines credibility of defendant's allegation of fraud and misrepresentation - Whether non-reply to a solicitor's letter of demand have bearing on credibility of defendant - Whether defendant used all legal devices available to delay paying plaintiff for work done
- For the plaintiff - Choon Hun Leng & Cheryl Leong See Teng; M/s Sanjay Mohan
- For the defendant - Avinash Kamalanathan; M/s SM Lee & Co
|
|
[2025] CLJU 124
|
BAHVEST RESOURCES BERHAD & ANOR v. LO FUI MING & ORS; LO FUI MING & ORS (PROPOSED CONTEMNORS)
There was no requirement to give any prior notice to show cause to a proposed contemnor before the filing of an application for committal proceedings. The notice to show cause referred to in O. 52 r. 2B of the Rules of Court 2012 ("ROC") refers to the documents stated in O. 52 r. 4(3) of the ROC, particularly the notice of application itself.
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Contempt of court - Committal proceedings - Breach of injunction order - Whether failure to serve notice to show cause pursuant to O. 52 r. 2B of Rules of Court 2012 was a good ground to oppose committal proceedings - Whether breach of injunction order proven beyond reasonable doubt
- For the plaintiff - Norbert Yapp & Associates
- For the proposed contemnors - Andy Tay & Associates
|
|
[2025] CLJU 130
|
FOO TSEH WEI lwn. JB ADVANCE PLASTIC SDN. BHD; TOYOTA TSUSHO (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD (PENCELAH)
1. Semua tindakan yang berkaitan dengan syarikat yang telah digulungkan hendaklah dijalankan oleh penyelesai dan/atau pegawai penerima. Justeru, suatu rayuan atau permohonan untuk kebenaran untuk merayu oleh syarikat yang telah digulungkan hendaklah dibuat oleh pegawai penerima dan bukan syarikat yang telah digulungkan atau penyumbang kepada syarikat yang telah gulungkan.
2. Suatu permohonan kebenaran untuk merayu hanya boleh diberikan secara prospektif dan tidak boleh diberikan secara ke belakang. Justeru, permohonan kebenaran perlu diperolehi terlebih dahulu oleh syarikat yang telah digulungkan sebelum rayuan difailkan dan bukan memfailkan permohonan kebenaran selepas rayuan telah difailkan.
PROSEDUR SIVIL: Rayuan - Kebenaran - Permohonan dibuat oleh penyumbang syarikat yang telah digulungkan - Permohonan dibuat setelah rayuan difailkan - Permohonan dibantah oleh pencelah - Sama ada permohonan kebenaran jika dibenarkan akan memberi kesan ke belakang - Sama ada permohonan kebenaran hanya boleh diberikan secara prospektif - Sama ada pemohon layak membuat permohonan - Sama ada pemohon telah memenuhi syarat untuk memfailkan kebenaran - Sama ada rayuan telah difailkan tanpa kuasa yang sah
PROSEDUR SIVIL: Pihak-pihak - Pencelah - Permohonan menjadi pencelah dalam permohonan kebenaran untuk merayu - Pencelah adalah pemiutang bercagar - Sama ada pencelah mempunyai kepentingan secara langsung dalam permohonan kebenaran
- Bagi pihak pemohon - Lim Kon Keen & Yong Hui Ying; T/n JW Wong & Partner
- Bagi pihak pegawai penerima - Nor Deana Aqilah Aliman
- Bagi pihak pencelah - Lee Shih & Sarah Chin Yuan Ching; T/n Lim Chee Wee Partnership
|
CLJ 2025 Volume 8 (Part 4)
(i) When a clause in a sale and purchase agreement clearly contains a condition precedent with a definitive stop date, and such condition is not met, the contract becomes void under s. 36(1) of the Contracts Act 1950; (ii) Once a sale and purchase agreement is validly terminated, no further obligations remain to be performed. The other party cannot subsequently invoke the termination provisions.
Karak Land Sdn Bhd v. Luxury Terrace Sdn Bhd [2025] 8 CLJ 529 [CA]
CONTRACT
CONTRACT: Agreement - Sale and purchase agreement ('SPA') - Termination clause - Failure to obtain consent to transfer of property from Estate Land Board within six months from date of SPA - Whether either party entitled to elect to determine agreement with specific forfeiture and refund terms - Whether contract became void - Whether further obligations remain to be performed once SPA validly terminated - Contracts Act 1950, s. 36(1) - Evidence Act 1950, ss. 101 & 102
See Mee Chun JCA
Wong Kian Kheong JCA
Ismail Brahim JCA
- For the appellant - Ramesh K Supramaniam & Kanarasan Ghandinesen; M/s Ramesh K Supramaniam
- For the respondent - Alan Chua Hock Kwang & Jowena John; M/s Alan Chua & Co
(i) Purchasers who participate in a project in a designated special economic zone governed by a state development authority which implements a private lease scheme are very much aware of the unique conditions surrounding their purchase. They would be estopped from challenging the validity of the lease terms when they have already benefitted from the structure; they cannot take advantage of the benefits of the scheme while simultaneously rejecting the foundational terms under which those benefits were granted; (ii) By applying the second actor theory referenced in the case of Obata-Ambak Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals, developers, as the second actor, relying on public authority's approvals as well as guidelines in good faith, is acting lawfully when it completes the project within timeframes expressly stipulated in a sale and purchase agreement that aligns with the policy framework; (iii) Private lease arrangements under government-sanctioned frameworks are legally acceptable – so long as all statutory and regulatory safeguards are observed.
Tropika Istimewa Development Sdn Bhd v. Wong Hang Fah & Ors [2025] 8 CLJ 540 [CA]
CONTRACT
CONTRACT: Agreement - Sale and purchase agreement ('SPA') - Acquisition of properties in special project and development - Private lease scheme - Whether complied with initiative and approved by authorities - Whether contravened National Land Code ('NLC') and Strata Titles Act 1985 - Second actor theory - Whether applicable - Obata-Ambak Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals - Whether case of Ang Ming Lee & Ors v. Menteri Kesejahteraan Bandar, Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan & Anor And Other Appeals to be applied prospectively - Whether there was misrepresentation - Principles of caveator emptor - Whether applicable - Whether SPA in contravention of s. 221(3)(b) of NLC - Whether issuance of strata title and transfer of lease carried out in compliance with law - Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 - Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989
Ravinthran Paramaguru JCA
Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JCA
Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid JCA
- For the appellant - Lim Chee Wee, Marcus Tan Seng Peng & Eunice Kwong Sook Wen; M/s Ricky Tan & Co
- For the respondents - K L Wong & Wong Renn Xin; M/s K L Wong
(i) Discovery to trace misappropriated funds can be granted even if there's a significant time gap between the original disbursement and later payments, as funds can be channelled through multiple entities over time; (ii) The formal recording of transactions in audited statements does not negate the need for discovery if there are discrepancies, lack of supporting documentation, or signs of concealed fund destinations; (iii) Discovery is not a fishing expedition merely because it might incidentally reveal information about additional parties, provided it is otherwise properly founded and necessary; (iv) In cases of sophisticated financial fraud, a broad scope of discovery, including details of ATM cards, banking facilities, and other banking products, is justified to trace all potential avenues of fund dissipation.
Bank Pembangunan Malaysia Bhd v. Sidqi Ahmad Said Ahmad & Ors [2025] 8 CLJ 567 [HC]
CIVIL PROCEDURE | BANKING
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Discovery - Application for - Parties entered into loan agreement - Borrower defaulted in repayment - Borrower obtained stay of execution subject to bank's right to appoint receiver and manager ('R&M') under debenture - Discovery of irregularities in relation to loan - Bank sought discoveries of banking records regarding certain accounts in order to trace disbursed loan sum - Whether documents sought necessary - Whether temporally impossible for payments made to alleged recipients to have originated from loan funds - Whether R&M's findings one-sided assertions - Whether formal documentation and accounting of transactions in audited statements negated suggestion of fraudulent conduct - Whether discovery application constituted fishing expedition - Whether procedurally proper - Rules of Court 2012, O. 24 r. 7A
BANKING: Banking facility - Loan facility - Application by bank for discovery of documents - Discovery of irregularities in relation to loan - Bank sought discoveries of banking records regarding certain accounts in order to trace disbursed loan sum - Whether documents sought necessary - Whether temporally impossible for payments made to alleged recipients to have originated from loan funds - Whether receiver and manager's findings one-sided assertions - Whether formal documentation and accounting of transactions in audited statements negated any suggestion of fraudulent conduct - Whether discovery application constituted fishing expedition - Whether procedurally proper - Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949, s. 7
Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad J
- For the plaintiff - Lim Chee Wee & Nathalie Ker Si Min; M/s Lim Chee Wee Partnership
- For the 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 11th, 17th, 22nd, 24th & 25th defendants - Syamsul Azhar & Sasha Nameera Sabtu; M/s Azhar Aziz & Assocs
A society registered under the Societies Act 1966 ('Act') does not have the locus standi to sue for defamation, as its reputation is not capable of sustaining such an action. This principle, established for political parties in Lim Lip Eng v. Ong Ka Chuan, extends to all societies due to the application of s. 9(c) of the said Act.
Mahdzir Md Isa v. Mohd Ridhuan Tee Abdullah [2025] 8 CLJ 600 [HC]
TORT
TORT: Defamation - Claim - Locus standi - Action filed by society/claimant against individual/alleged tortfeasor - Alleged tortfeasor published three articles on Facebook account supposedly defaming claimant - Claimant sought damages, orders and injunction against alleged tortfeasor - Whether claimant, as society, had locus standi to initiate and/or maintain defamation suit against alleged tortfeasor - Whether principle precluding political party from suing in defamation, in Lim Lip Eng v. Ong Ka Chuan, applied equally to claimant - Societies Act 1966, s. 9(c)
- For the plaintiffs - Awang Armadajaya Awang Mahmud, Marwan Abdullah, Syafiqah Abd Razak, Umi Kelathun Abd Ghani & Shakirah Ahmad Sharifuddin; M/s Mu'az Aiman Halem Auzan & Assocs
- For the defendant - Ashmadi Othman, Buhsro Mohamad Anuar & Ahmed Burhan Tee Abdullah; M/s Zulpadli & Edham
When a professional footballer's sudden cardiac arrest is caused by some injury during a training session under the control and/or management of the football club or association, the football club or association has the duty to ensure that the player is given reasonable and adequate medical assistance in the event of an emergency until full treatment is rendered in a health facility. The duty is not to prevent a cardiac arrest from happening to a player but rather to ensure that the player is not deprived of reasonable and adequate immediate medical assistance in the event of a cardiac emergency. That duty is self-evident and should not depend on the existence of specific guidelines or regulations from FIFA, AFC, or FAM. Failure to ensure that a sufficiently equipped doctor is present at trainings to render emergency medical support is clearly a breach of duty of care by the football club or association towards its players.
Marjan Petrovski v. Datuk Seri Utama Ir Hj Idris Hj Haron & Ors [2025] 8 CLJ 652 [HC]
TORT
TORT: Breach - Duty of care - Negligence - Professional football player struck by lightning on training field and went into cardiac arrest - Whether ought to be within reasonable knowledge and foreseeability of football clubs and associations that sudden cardiac arrest a risk amongst professional footballers - Whether employers of professional athletes had duty of care to ensure players given reasonable and adequate medical assistance - Failure of football club to have medical doctor present at training - Whether constituted failure in complying with regulations - Whether there was direct causation between deceased's death and football club's breach of duty - Whether there was breach of contractual obligations - Whether damages sought awarded
- For the plaintiff - Eng Kar Wei & Ryan Chu; M/s Lee & Poh Partnership
- For the defendants - Syed Nur Aiman Syed Abdul Hamid; M/s The Chambers of Syed Nur Aiman
The matter on the interpretation, validation and application of a survivorship clause of a joint fixed deposit account falls within the realm of banking and contract law, which are explicitly governed under the Federal List, Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution. Civil courts are equipped with the jurisdiction to hear the matter and not the Shariah Court, even if the matter involves Shariah principles.
Wan Badaruddin Che Wan Basor Ali v. CIMB Bank Bhd & Anor [2025] 8 CLJ 674 [HC]
JURISDICTION
JURISDICTION: Courts - Jurisdiction - Application to refer issues to Shariah High Court from civil High Court - Application pursuant to suit initiated in civil High Court for breach of contract - Breach of survivorship clause of joint fixed deposit account - Whether fell under jurisdiction of civil High Court or Shariah High Court - Whether corporate entity has capacity to profess any religion - Whether Shariah Court's decision could affect right or property of non-Muslim - Whether issue on interpretation, validity and applicability of survivorship clause fell under realm of banking and contract law, hence, under jurisdiction of civil courts - Whether issues should be referred to Shariah Advisory Council of Bank Negara Malaysia
- For the plaintiff - Mohd Jamil Yaacob; M/s Srihana Mohamad & Partners
- For the 1st defendant - Saresh Mahendran; M/s Shearn Delamore & Co
- For the 2nd defendant - Hizri Hasshan & Dorina Abdullah; M/s Najib Hisham Isa
ARTICLES
LNS Article(s)
-
PROHIBITIVE ELEMENTS IN ISLAMIC CONTRACTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN MUSLIM DAILY LIFE
[Read excerpt]
by Rachel Iun Cia Huan[i] Yeoh En En[ii] Toh Bethia[iii] Pritysha Pemla[iv] Sabrina Ng Zhi Shuen[v] Dr Ruzian Markom[vi] [2025] CLJU(A) lxxxviii
[2025] CLJU(A) lxxxviii
MALAYSIA
PROHIBITIVE ELEMENTS IN ISLAMIC CONTRACTS:
IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN MUSLIM DAILY LIFE
by
Rachel Iun Cia Huan[i]
Yeoh En En[ii]
Toh Bethia[iii]
Pritysha Pemla[iv]
Sabrina Ng Zhi Shuen[v]
Dr Ruzian Markom[vi]
ABSTRACT
This study examines the persistent significance of Islamic prohibitions on riba (usury), gharar (uncertainty), and maysir (gambling) in contemporary Muslim daily life. Notwithstanding explicit directives from the Qur'an and Sunnah, these components persist throughout several financial practices, often unwittingly via mechanisms such as insurance policies, Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) programs, and concealed service fees in healthcare or internet markets. This research employs a qualitative methodology that integrates doctrinal and socio-legal analysis to investigate the translation of classical jurisprudence into contemporary contexts. Primary sources, including fatwas, fiqh literature, and judicial rulings, are corroborated by interviews and modern case studies. The results indicate a notable disparity between theoretical understanding and practical implementation, influenced by inadequate awareness, intricate contract frameworks, and restricted availability of Shariah-compliant options. The analysis underscores the pressing necessity for enhanced financial literacy, transparency, and regulatory clarity to safeguard Muslim customers against inadvertent non-compliance. It finishes by advocating for proactive collaboration among scholars, financial institutions, and educational entities to safeguard and adapt ethical principles in Islamic commercial law to contemporary difficulties.
. . .
-
THE JKR SARAWAK FORM OF CONTRACT PWD 75 (VER. 2021): FINAL ACCOUNT AND FINAL CERTIFICATE EXPLAINED
[Read excerpt]
by Julian Chen Jia Hua* [2025] CLJU(A) lxxxix
[2025] CLJU(A) lxxxix
MALAYSIA
THE JKR SARAWAK FORM OF CONTRACT PWD 75 (VER. 2021):
FINAL ACCOUNT AND FINAL CERTIFICATE EXPLAINED
by
Julian Chen Jia Hua*
In a typical construction contract, the issuance of the Certificate of Practical Completion ('CPC') marks not the end, but rather, the commencement of a critical exercise, which is the preparation of the Final Account and the issuance of the Final Certificate. This stage is significant for the Contractor as it would reflect whether the contract/project has resulted in the financial outcome that it forecasted previously.
Whilst the legal implications of the Final Account and Final Certificate under other standard forms of contract in Malaysia, such as the Standard Agreement and Conditions of PAM Contract 2018 ('PAM 2018') and the Standard Form of Contract to be used where Bill of Quantities form part of the Contract PWD Form 203A Rev. 2007 ("PWD Form") have been of considerable discussion, the interpretation and operation of similar provisions under the JKR Sarawak Form of Contract PWD 75 (Ver. 2021) ('JKR Sarawak Form') remain relatively unexplored.
In this regard, this article seeks to analyse the relevant clauses in the Sarawak JKR Form, particularly on the operation of the clause governing Final Account and Final Certificate, the Contractor's procedural obligations, the conclusiveness of the Final Certificate, and whether a final account claim may still be pursued through statutory adjudication under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ('CIPAA') for final account claim.
. . .
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS
Principal Acts
Amending Acts
| Number |
Title |
In force from |
Principal/Amending Act No |
| ACT A1767 |
Constitution (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 2025 |
Not Yet In Force |
ACT 000 |
| ACT A1766 |
Commercial Vehicles Licensing Board (Amendment) Act 2025 |
10 July 2025 |
ACT 334 |
| ACT A1765 |
Tunku Abdul Rahman Foundation Fund (Amendment) Act 2025 |
15 June 2025 [PU(B) 218/2025] |
ACT 389 |
| ACT A1764 |
Fire Services (Amendment) Act 2025 |
1 July 2025 [PU(B) 238/2025] - ss 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18; 1 January 2026 - ss 2, 3, 4, 11, 19, 20 and 21 |
ACT 341 |
| ACT A1763 |
Supplementary Supply (2024) Act 2025 |
15 May 2025 |
|
PU(A)
PU(B)
Legislation Alert
Updated
| Act/Principal No. |
Title |
Amended by |
In force from |
Section amended |
| AKTA 725 |
Akta Tenaga Boleh Baharu 2011 |
PU(A) 251/2025 |
28 Januari 2019 |
Jadual |
| ACT 725 |
Renewable Energy Act 2011 |
PU(A) 251/2025 |
28 January 2019 |
Schedule |
| AKTA 615 |
Akta Kesihatan Mental 2001 |
AKTA A1693 |
10 September 2025 [PU(B) 330/2025] |
Seksyen 11 |
| ACT 615 |
Mental Health Act 2001 |
ACT A1693 |
10 September 2025 [PU(B) 330/2025] |
Section 11 |
| ACT 593 |
Criminal Procedure Code (Revised 1999) |
ACT A1692 |
10 September 2025 [PU(B) 329/2025] |
First Schedule |
Revoked
| Act/Principal No. |
Title |
Revoked by |
In force from |
| PU(A) 365/2023 |
Federal Constitution (Review of Special Grant Under Article 112d) (State of Sarawak) Order 2023 |
PU(A) 272/2025 |
28 August 2025 |
| PU(A) 312/1998 |
Drug Dependants (Treatment and Rehabilitation) (Conditions on Supervision of Drug Dependants Who Volunteer For Treatment and Rehabilitation) Rules 1998 |
PU(A) 264/2025 |
22 August 2025 |
| PU(A) 310/1998 |
Drug Dependants (Treatment and Rehabilitation) (Forms) Rules 1998 |
PU(A) 263/2025 |
22 August 2025 |
| PU(A) 364/2023 |
Federal Constitution (Review of Special Grant Under Article 112D) (State of Sabah) Order 2023 |
PU(A) 271/2025 |
28 August 2025 |
| PU(A) 161/2024 |
Price Control and Anti-Profiteering (Price Marking of Price-Controlled Goods) (No. 5) Order 2024 |
PU(A) 241/2025 |
1 August 2025 |
|
