LLB Bulletin Header
LLB Bulletin #4/2026 15 April 2026

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 3 of 2026)

SUBJECT INDEX

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Liability – Joint and severally – Unremitted employee retirement fund contributions in violation of statutory obligations – Action against football association and its office bearers – Whether football association an employer as defined under s. 2 of Employees Provident Fund Act 1991 ('EPF Act') – Whether football association liable to pay EPF contribution arrears as stipulated under s. 45 of EPF Act – Whether office bearers jointly and severally liable with football association for outstanding contributions, dividends and late payment charges under s. 46 of EPF Act – Whether liability attached by virtue of holding office during period of default – Payment of revised claim – Whether assessment precise, accurate and detailed
Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) v. Persatuan Bola Sepak Kedah Darul Aman & Ors
(Johan Lee Kien How J) [2026] 1 ILR 474 cljprime labourlaw

CONTRACT

Employment contract – Agency – Terms and conditions – Clause restricting right of spouse of agent of insurance company from taking employment with another insurance company or takaful operator – Restriction on third parties' rights of employment indirectly imposed through contracting party – Whether clause fell foul of s. 28 of Contracts Act 1950
Baanu Mohan v. AIA Bhd
(Mohd Arief Emran Arifin J) [2026] 1 ILR 469 cljprime labourlaw

Employment contract – Breach – Abandonment of service – Allegation of verbal dismissal – Claimant told to leave premises immediately and hand over company property – Claimant failed to report for work – Whether there was intention not to be bound by contract – Whether claimant breached contract by failing to return to work
Lam Chung Ming v. Lek Sun Manufacturing Sdn Bhd
(Jeyaseelen T Anthony) [2026] 1 ILR 548 cljprime labourlaw

Employment contract – Contract of service – Repudiation – Abandonment of employment – Employee absent from work for more than two consecutive days without prior leave or permission – Employee dismissed from employment – Whether employee's conduct amounted to repudiation of employment contract
Izzah Maisarah Martin Abdullah v. Wellnesspreneur Group Sdn Bhd
(Ahmad Razif Mohd Sidek) [2026] 1 ILR 587 cljprime labourlaw

EVIDENCE

Burden of proof – Fact of dismissal – Claimant told to leave premises immediately and hand over company property – Claimant remained on premises until usual clock-out time – Whether subsequent conduct of staying on premises after alleged dismissal indicated afterthought – Failure to produce handover notes for company's property – Evidence Act 1950, ss. 8(2) & 101(1)
Lam Chung Ming v. Lek Sun Manufacturing Sdn Bhd
(Jeyaseelen T Anthony) [2026] 1 ILR 548 cljprime labourlaw

LABOUR LAW

Employment – Dismissal – Allegation of verbal dismissal – Claimant told to leave premises immediately and handover company property – Claimant remained on premises until usual clock-out time – Whether conduct consistent with dismissal – Whether there was dismissal – Industrial Relations Act 1967
Lam Chung Ming v. Lek Sun Manufacturing Sdn Bhd
(Jeyaseelen T Anthony) [2026] 1 ILR 548 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Abandonment of employment – Employee absent from work for more than two consecutive days without prior leave or permission of employer – Employee dismissed from employment – Whether employee's conduct amounted to repudiation of employment contract – Whether there was dismissal – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse – Employment Act 1955, ss. 13(2) & 15(2) – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3)
Izzah Maisarah Martin Abdullah v. Wellnesspreneur Group Sdn Bhd
(Ahmad Razif Mohd Sidek) [2026] 1 ILR 587 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Inappropriate relationship – Sexual grooming of minor – Head of School engaging in intimate communications with female student – Head of school dismissed from employment – Whether charge proven – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse
Kailash Ganeshan v. TNT Cosultancy Sdn Bhd
(Paramalingam J Doraisamy) [2026] 1 ILR 643 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Physical force – Head of School allegedly slapped student multiple times on cheek during handball tournament – Whether mere act of telling student to 'wake up' – Whether amounted to assault – Whether charge proven – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse
Kailash Ganeshan v. TNT Cosultancy Sdn Bhd
(Paramalingam J Doraisamy) [2026] 1 ILR 643 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Physical force and verbal abuse – Head of school pulled student out of classroom, berating him with profanities, and slapping him – Head of school dismissed from employment – Whether charge proven – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse Kailash Ganeshan v. TNT Cosultancy Sdn Bhd
(Paramalingam J Doraisamy) [2026] 1 ILR 643 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Procurement of IT assets – Failure to disclose absence of specified ports in newly procured laptops – Concealment of deployment delays due to security patches – Misleading management on deployment progress – Failure to maintain proper inventory of IT assets – Attempt to hamper audit exercise – Employee found guilty of misconducts and dismissed from employment – Seniority and accountability – Whether charges proven – Whether misconducts warranted dismissal – Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3)
Lim Kak Ming v. Malayan Banking Berhad
(Zulhelmy Hasan) [2026] 1 ILR 510 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Sexual harassment – Allegations of inappropriate physical contact and suggestive remarks perpetrated by male employee against female employees – Male employee found guilty and dismissed from employment – Whether domestic inquiry flawed – Whether charges proven – Whether physical contact accidental and unintentional due to spatial constraints – Whether employee dismissed with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Act 1967
Muhammad Firdaus Sharudin v. Denso (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Pravin Kaur Jessy) [2026] 1 ILR 563 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Probationer – Poor performance – Probationer terminated before expiry of six-month probationary period – Allegations of incompetence – Absence of written warnings, evaluations, or performance improvement plan – Duty of employer to provide sufficient opportunity for improvement during agreed probationary period – Whether employer proved poor performance on a balance of probabilities – Whether premature termination of probationer for reasons other than misconduct was just – Whether verbal warnings alone are sufficient to substantiate a case for poor performance – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3)
Jeenath Begum M A Haja Mohideen v. Iris Corporation Berhad
(Chow Siew Lin) [2026] 1 ILR 626 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Probationer – Poor performance – Termination of probationer on grounds of failing to meet targets – Whether targets clearly defined and communicated – Whether employer conducted monthly evaluations as per employment contract – Whether employer provided warnings and opportunity to improve – Whether employer's allegations of poor performance substantiated by documentary evidence – Whether dismissal bona fide – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3)
Mohd Izwan Mohd Puad v. Wahaba Realty Sdn Bhd
(Amrik Singh) [2026] 1 ILR 603 cljprime labourlaw

Employment – Termination – Retrenchment – Redundancy – Employer experiencing financial problems and executed redundancy exercise – Whether terminated employees voluntarily accepted termination notice and retrenchment compensation – Factors determining voluntariness – Employment Act 1955, s. 7
KNM Exotic Equipment Sdn Bhd v. Mohd Yunus Abdul Rahman & Ors
(Anselm Charles Fernandis J) [2026] 1 ILR 493 cljprime labourlaw

PROVIDENT FUND

Employees Provident Fund – Unremitted employee retirement fund contributions in violation of statutory obligations – Liability – Action against football association and its office bearers – Whether football association an employer as defined under s. 2 of Employees Provident Fund Act 1991 ('EPF Act') – Whether football association liable to pay EPF contribution arrears as stipulated under s. 45 of EPF Act – Whether office bearers jointly and severally liable with football association for outstanding contributions, dividends and late payment charges under s. 46 of EPF Act – Whether liability attached by virtue of holding office during period of default – Payment of revised claim – Whether assessment precise, accurate and detailed
Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) v. Persatuan Bola Sepak Kedah Darul Aman & Ors
(Johan Lee Kien How J) [2026] 1 ILR 474 cljprime labourlaw

Copyright © 2026 MYLAWBOX Sdn Bhd