Back to Top


CLJ Logo CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2014, Vol 04
24 January 2014

Print this page
Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Case Of The Week

a) DATO' SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM v. KHAIRY JAMALUDDIN

b) KU AZMAN KU BAHARI lwn. PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO BHD [2013] 2 SMC 189

c) JUDICIAL QUOTES

2. Latest Cases

a) Legal Network Series

b) CLJ 2014 Volume 1 (Part 4)

3. Articles

a) Legal Network Series Article

4. Legislation Highlights

a) Principal Acts

b) Amending Acts

c) PU(A)

d) PU(B)


CASE OF THE WEEK

DATO' SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM v. KHAIRY JAMALUDDIN
HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
SM KOMATHY SUPPIAH JC
[CIVIL SUIT NO: S2-23-44-2008]
4 NOVEMBER 2013

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Pleadings - Defence - Amendment - Amendment of defence in libel action - Application made after completion of preliminaries and pre-trial procedures and after case fixed for hearing - Whether amendment disclosed defence of justification - Whether delay in application justified - Whether purported particulars amounted to facts - Whether proposed plea of justification correct, proper and applicable - Rules of Court 2012, O. 20 r. 5

TORT: Defamation - Libel - Allegation of utterance of defamatory remarks during political speech - Application to amend made after completion of preliminaries and pre-trial procedures and after case fixed for hearing - Whether applicant entitled to present his version of what the words allegedly uttered by him meant

KU AZMAN KU BAHARI lwn. PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO BHD [2013] 2 SMC 189
MAHKAMAH MAJISTRET, ALOR SETAR
MOHD AZHAR HAMZAH MJ
[KES SIVIL NO: 72-197-02-2013]
9 OKTOBER 2013

PROSEDUR SIVIL: Penghakiman terus - Permohonan - Sama ada tuntutan plaintif dihalang oleh had masa - Sama ada permulaan sesuatu tuntutan penghakiman hanya boleh dibuat apabila penghakiman itu boleh dikuatkuasakan - Akta Had Masa 1953, s. 6(3) - Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012, A. 14

PROSEDUR SIVIL: Had masa - Bila kausa tindakan bermula - Sama ada permulaan sesuatu tuntutan penghakiman hanya boleh dibuat apabila penghakiman itu boleh dikuatkuasakan - Akta Had Masa 1953, s. 6(3)

PERKATAAN & FRASA: "dari tarikh penghakiman itu boleh dikuatkuasakan" - Akta Had Masa 1953, s. 6(3) - Makna - Sama ada permulaan sesuatu tuntutan penghakiman hanya boleh dibuat apabila penghakiman itu boleh dikuatkuasakan

To view a sample of the Sessions and Magistrates' Cases journal, click here. For product enquiries, contact priority@cljlaw.com.

JUDICIAL QUOTES

KETUA POLIS DAERAH JOHOR BAHRU, JOHOR & ORS v. NGUI TEK CHOI [2013] 4 CLJ 47

[2] Issue: Whether the issuance of a remand order under s. 117 Criminal Procedure Code is an act of judicial authority and a matter entirely within the discretion of the Magistrate; and further, whether any police officer acting in obedience to such order could be held liable for false imprisonment or is immune from such liability.

“The learned Judicial Commissioner had misdirected himself on the law when he ruled that the said remand order was rendered null and void by the mistake on the investigation diaries relating to the plaintiff.”

“In our view, the fact that the Magistrate issued the said remand order would necessarily imply that the learned Magistrate was satisfied with the identity of the suspect as well as the purpose of the remand requested. The learned JC had himself found that the mistake in the police report number in the investigation diaries was only a typographical error and there was no malice on the part of the police in applying for the said remand order. As stated earlier, since the issue of a remand order is a matter of discretion of the Magistrate, surely it was not for the learned JC to substitute his own view for that of the Magistrate.”

“Applying the principle laid down in the Indian case of Suddha Shivarame Gowda v. State of Kerala [1993] Cri LJ 1533 (Kant), we were of the view that despite the typographical error, if there were other sufficient materials in the “kertas butir-butir siasatan” to enable the learned Magistrate to exercise his discretion whether or not to grant the remand order, there would be no impediment for the Magistrate to do so.”

“It is trite law that a remand order, once issued constitutes the act of a judicial authority under s. 117 CPC and any police officer acting in obedience to such an order is immune from liability for such lawful detention, as clearly provided in s. 32(1) of the Police Act.”

“For all intents and purposes, the plaintiff’s detention between the period 8 February 2001 to 14 February 2001 was a judicial act of the said Magistrate for which the defendants could not be held liable for false imprisonment” – per Lim Yee Lan JCA of the Court of Appeal in Ketua Polis Daerah Johor Bahru, Johor & Ors v. Ngui Tek Choi [2013] 4 CLJ 47.

For more Judicial Quotes, please login and view under "References" or subscribe to CLJLaw.

LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2010] 1 LNS 1958

MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM v. USHA KUMARI RAM LALL & ANOR

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review - Application for - Certiorari - Industrial Court decision based on facts as found by Industrial Court decision based on evidence produced and testimony of witnesses - Whether the High Court was bound to accept such finding - Whether omission by counsel for applicant to cross-examine 1st respondent on her monthly salary and failure to produce evidence to contradict 1st respondent's evidence on her monthly salary was a ground for curial intervention - Whether Industrial Court committed any error of law to merit intervention

[2010] 1 LNS 1970

GEORGE Y HUANG & ANOR v. TSENG CHI FENG

EVIDENCE: Witness - Absent witness - Whether 2nd plaintiff's claim must fail because she had not appeared in court to give evidence to establish her case against defendant - Whether circumstances relating to transactions in case and its contentious issues in the course of establishing her case would necessitate her to appear and give evidence and be cross-examined in court - Whether her absence was adverse to her claim

EVIDENCE: Adverse inference - Failure to call witness - Defendant alleged that plaintiffs sold their shares to Yu Teng Chao - Whether under s. 101 of the Evidence Act 1950, it became defendant's duty to discharge burden to prove the same - Whether by failing to call Yu Teng Chao to the stand, an adverse inference under s. 114(g) of the Evidence Act 1950 should apply against defendant

EVIDENCE: Documentary evidence - Stamping - Purported agreements not admitted as evidence as not stamped for duties due and payable - Whether 3 agreements could still be admitted by plaintiff paying up necessary duty and getting it duly stamped - Whether relevant agreements should be impounded and stamp duties chargeable in respect thereto be paid by 1st plaintiff before they could be admitted as evidence and be acted on by the court

[2013] 1 LNS 401

VALLEY THEME SDN BHD v. BANK PERTANIAN MALAYSIA BERHAD

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Summary application - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 14A - Question whether Letter of Offer was a conditional agreement which required execution of loan and security documents incorporating all terms of said Letter of Offer and such other terms and conditions to be agreed by both parties in order to be enforceable between the parties - Whether such question was unsuitable for determination without a trial of the action - Whether there were documents to be looked into and agreed upon by parties - Whether there were issues on facts that needed to be explained and ascertained through oral testimonies in a full trial - Whether case must follow ordinary process of the law

[2013] 1 LNS 461

RHB BANK BERHAD v. BURN PROOF DISTRIBUTION (M) SDN BHD & ORS

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Summary judgment - Application for - Guarantee - Whether other arrangement reached with co-guarantors was a matter inter se between them and the plaintiff - Whether it extinguished right of plaintiff to enforce guarantee against 4th defendant, after 1st defendant defaulted in facilities - Whether 4th defendant deemed to have been released from his obligations under the personal guarantees when he ceased to be a director of 1st defendant - Whether amounts as certified in Certificate of Indebtedness was conclusive and recoverable by plaintiff from 4th defendant - Whether any triable issue raised - Whether any useful purpose would be served in referring matter to full trial

[2013] 1 LNS 462

LOKE KOOI CHUAN PROPERTIES SDN BHD v. LEE KWEE FOH SDN BHD

COMPANY LAW: Liquidation - Voluntary liquidation - Locus standi of defendant company to file present application - Whether on its dissolution, defendant company ceased to exist - Whether it could file any action or be sued as it had no legal status - Whether application filed by defendant was misconceived in law

CLJ 2014 Volume 1 (Part 4)

COURT

FEDERAL COURT

PP v. Jitweer Singh Ojagar Singh
Hashim Yusoff, Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Zainun Ali, Jeffrey Tan FCJJ
(Criminal Law; Evidence; Criminal Procedure - Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Oral statement - Petition of appeal) [2014] 1 CLJ 433 [FC]

COURT OF APPEAL

Kay Hian Pte Ltd v. Ma Boon Lan
Azahar Mohamed, Balia Yusof Wahi, Lim Yee Lan JJCA
(Bankruptcy - Notice - Setting aside - Conversion of judgment debt from Singapore currency to Malaysian Ringgit) [2014] 1 CLJ 464 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim v. Khairy Jamaluddin
SM Komathy Suppiah JC
(Civil Procedure; Tort - Defamation - Pleadings - Defence - Amendment) [2014] 1 CLJ 499 [HC]

Globaltech Enterprise Sdn Bhd v. Commerce Assurance Bhd
Stephen Chung J
(Civil Procedure - Costs - Bill of costs - Taxation - Getting up fee) [2014] 1 CLJ 517 [HC]

Goh Chin Chuan v. PP
Zamani A Rahim J
(Criminal Procedure - Charge - Framing or particulars of - Defective charge) [2014] 1 CLJ 524 [HC]

Re Ganapathy Sivagnanam; ex p Phileoallied Bank (Malaysia) Bhd
Lee Swee Seng JC
(Bankruptcy - Notice - Setting aside - Validity of - Default judgment) [2014] 1 CLJ 534 [HC]

Tekital Sdn Bhd v. Sarina Kamaludin & Ors
Nallini Pathmanathan J
(Damages - Measure of damages - Assessment - Pecuniary loss - Loss of investment) [2014] 1 CLJ 552 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

BANKRUPTCY

Notice - Setting aside - Application for - Affidavit under r. 95 Bankruptcy Rules 1969 - Whether satisfied requirement under r. 94(2) - Whether bankruptcy notice bad in law
Re Ganapathy Sivagnanam; ex p Phileoallied Bank (Malaysia) Bhd
(Lee Swee Seng JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 534 [HC]

Notice - Setting aside - Conversion of judgment debt from Singapore currency to Malaysian Ringgit - Failure of - Whether rendered bankruptcy notice (`BN') a nullity - Whether conversion should be based on exchange rate prevailing at date of judgment - Whether judgment creditor's failure to obtain leave of court to commence execution proceedings following change of name rendered BN bad - Whether there was an abuse of process of court - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 46 r. 2(1)(b)
Kay Hian Pte Ltd v. Ma Boon Lan
(Azahar Mohamed, Balia Yusof Wahi, Lim Yee Lan JJCA) [2014] 1 CLJ 464 [CA]

Notice - Validity of - Bankruptcy notice based on default judgment - Non-statement of third party security in favour of judgment creditor - Whether rendered bankruptcy notice bad in law
Re Ganapathy Sivagnanam; ex p Phileoallied Bank (Malaysia) Bhd
(Lee Swee Seng JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 534 [HC]

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Fresh evidence - Admission of - Whether reasonable diligence would have made new evidence available at first instance - Whether admission of fresh evidence allowed - Rules of Court 2012, O. 56 r. 1(3A)
Globaltech Enterprise Sdn Bhd v. Commerce Assurance Bhd
(Stephen Chung J) [2014] 1 CLJ 517 [HC]

Costs - Bill of costs - Taxation - Getting up fee - Decision by Senior Assistant Registrar (SAR) - Appeal against award granted - Whether court disturbed decision of SAR - Whether any grounds to merit interference in exercise of discretion by SAR - Whether award granted reasonable - Whether SAR exercised discretion lawfully
Globaltech Enterprise Sdn Bhd v. Commerce Assurance Bhd
(Stephen Chung J) [2014] 1 CLJ 517 [HC]

Pleadings - Defence - Amendment - Amendment of defence in libel action - Application made after completion of preliminaries and pre-trial procedures and after case fixed for hearing - Whether amendment disclosed defence of justification - Whether delay in application justified - Whether purported particulars amounted to facts - Whether proposed plea of justification correct, proper and applicable - Rules of Court 2012, O. 20 r. 5
Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim v. Khairy Jamaluddin
(SM Komathy Suppiah JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 499 [HC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Appeal against acquittal - Accused a medical doctor - Deceased and accused lived separately and apart - Involvement in death of deceased - Whether proved - Failure to procure attendance of material witness - Whether adverse inference invoked - Statement by witness - Criminal Procedure Code, s. 112 - Whether admissible - Whether efforts taken by prosecution to secure attendance of witness - Whether deceased died from natural cause - Conduct of accused - Whether pointed irresistibly to accused as perpetrator - Whether there was intention to kill within meaning of s. 300(a) or (b) Penal Code - Whether circumstantial evidence gave rise to inference that accused caused death of deceased
PP v. Jitweer Singh Ojagar Singh
(Hashim Yusoff, Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Zainun Ali, Jeffrey Tan FCJJ) [2014] 1 CLJ 433 [FC]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Petition of appeal - Failure to particularise points of law or facts - Whether court powerless to permit a point of law or fact which is not in petition of appeal to be raised
PP v. Jitweer Singh Ojagar Singh
(Hashim Yusoff, Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Zainun Ali, Jeffrey Tan FCJJ) [2014] 1 CLJ 433 [FC]

Charge - Framing or particulars of - Defective charge - Offence under ss. 13 & 14 Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 - Charge under s. 13 - Whether omission to state mode or particulars of exploitation rendered charge defective - Distinguishing feature of charges under ss. 13 and 14 - Whether defect curable under s. 422 Criminal Procedure Code - Charge under s. 14 - Whether omission to incorporate particulars of exploitation in charge fundamentally defective - Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007, s. 2
Goh Chin Chuan v. PP
(Zamani A Rahim J) [2014] 1 CLJ 524 [HC]

DAMAGES

Measure of damages - Assessment - Decision of Deputy Registrar in awarding damages - Appeal against - Plaintiff entitled to be compensated by defendants for unlawful means of conspiracy - Pecuniary loss - Whether plaintiff entitled to 10% share of profits - Total loss of investment suffered by plaintiff - Tabulation of - Whether untenable for plaintiff to receive a return of the full extent of his investment and profits - Whether there were errors in award of damages given by Registrar
Tekital Sdn Bhd v. Sarina Kamaludin & Ors
(Nallini Pathmanathan J) [2014] 1 CLJ 552 [HC]

EVIDENCE

Circumstantial evidence - Murder - Appeal against acquittal - Accused a medical doctor - Deceased and accused lived separately and apart - Involvement in death of deceased - Whether proved - Failure to procure attendance of material witness - Whether adverse inference invoked - Statement by witness - Criminal Procedure Code, s. 112 - Whether admissible - Whether efforts taken by prosecution to secure attendance of witness - Whether deceased died from natural cause - Conduct of accused - Whether pointed irresistibly to accused as perpetrator - Whether there was intention to kill within meaning of s. 300(a) or (b) Penal Code - Whether circumstantial evidence gave rise to inference that accused caused death of deceased
PP v. Jitweer Singh Ojagar Singh
(Hashim Yusoff, Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Zainun Ali, Jeffrey Tan FCJJ) [2014] 1 CLJ 433 [FC]

Statement - Oral statement - Admissibility of - Voice message - Whether a statement which could be heard and proved by direct evidence of witness who heard it - Evidence Act 1950, s. 60(1)(b) - Whether relied on testimonially to establish facts narrated by the words - Whether evidence of voice message should not have been rejected
PP v. Jitweer Singh Ojagar Singh
(Hashim Yusoff, Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Zainun Ali, Jeffrey Tan FCJJ) [2014] 1 CLJ 433 [FC]

TORT

Defamation - Libel - Allegation of utterance of defamatory remarks during political speech - Application to amend made after completion of preliminaries and pre-trial procedures and after case fixed for hearing - Whether applicant entitled to present his version of what the words allegedly uttered by him meant
Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim v. Khairy Jamaluddin
(SM Komathy Suppiah JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 499 [HC]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article

1. ISTIHSAN AND THE RENEWAL OF ISLAMIC LAW* [Read excerpt]
    by: MOHAMMAD HASHIM KAMALI** [2014] 1 LNS(A) i

2. ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND SEAT OF ARBITRATION [Read excerpt]
    by: ARUNACHALAM KASI* [2014] 1 LNS(A) ii

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Repealing
ACT 760 Fees (Department Of Museums Malaysia) (Validation) Act 2014 1 January 1991 to 11 June 2012 -Nil-
ACT 759 Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 277/2013] - except para(s) 1 to 10 of Schedule 9 and para(s) 13 to 19 of Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 758 Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 276/2013] - except s 129 and Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 757 Strata Management Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-
ACT 756 Traditional And Complementary Medicine Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-

Amending Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1458 Supply Act 2014 1 January 2014
ACT A1456 Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT 166
ACT A1455 Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2012 (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT A1444
ACT A1454 Supplementary Supply (2013) Act 2013 2 November 2013
ACT A1453 Supplementary Supply (2012) Act 2013 7 September 2013

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 21/2014 Road Traffic (Prohibition On Driving Of Goods Vehicles) Rules 2014 21 January 2014 29 January 2014 ACT 333
PU(A) 20/2014 Customs (Prohibition Of Removal) Order 2014 21 January 2014 27 January 2014 ACT 235
PU(A) 19/2014 Local Speed Limit (Federal Roads) (Specified Time Prohibition) Order 2014 21 January 2014 24 January 2014 to 7 February 2014 ACT 333
PU(A) 18/2014 Customs (Prohibition Of Imports) (Amendment) Order 2014 20 January 2014 27 January 2014 PU(A) 490/2012
PU(A) 17/2014 Customs (Values) (Crude Petroleum Oil) (No. 2) Order 2014 16 January 2014 17 January 2014 to 22 January 2014 ACT 235

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 33/2014 Appointment Of Members Of Licensing Board 20 January 2014 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 ACT 17
PU(B) 32/2014 Notice Of Completion Of Revision And Inspection Of Supplementary Electoral Rolls - Sarawak 20 January 2014 21 January 2014 PU(A) 293/2002
PU(B) 31/2014 Notice Of Completion Of Revision And Inspection Of Supplementary Electoral Rolls - Sabah 20 January 2014 21 January 2014 PU(A) 293/2002
PU(B) 30/2014 Notice Of Completion Of Revision And Inspection Of Supplementary Electoral Rolls - Federal Territory Of Labuan 20 January 2014 21 January 2014 PU(A) 293/2002
PU(B) 29/2014 Notice Of Completion Of Revision And Inspection Of Supplementary Electoral Rolls - Melaka 20 January 2014 21 January 2014 PU(A) 293/2002
[2014] 1 LNS(A) i MALAYSIA

ISTIHSAN AND THE RENEWAL OF ISLAMIC LAW*

by

MOHAMMAD HASHIM KAMALI**


I. Definition and Varieties of Istihsan

Being a derivation of the root word hasuna, istihsan literally means considering something good, preferable and beautiful. The reference is to beauty, in its common sense, that appeals to the eye and inclines the heart. The word can be used in an objective sense or purely subjectively when, for example, a person, whether layman or jurist, likes something and considers it beautiful even if other people might think otherwise. The word is also used in reference, to things which might be visible and obvious as well as those that are intellectually perceived.[1]

The leading madhahib have perceived istihsan somewhat differently from one another. Whereas the Maliki jurist Ibn al-'Arabi (d. 534H) has simply described istihsan as acting on the stronger of two evidences, (aqwa al-dalilayn), the Hanafi jurist al-Jassas (d. 370) defined it as departure from a ruling of qiyas in favour of another ruling which is considered preferable. The preference so exercised is prompted by the desire to achieve a more equitable solution because of the rigidity or unfairness that is brought about by strict adherence to the existing law. Ibn Taymiyya's (d. 728H) definition of istihsan seeks to relate this doctrine more closely to the textual sources and ijma'. Istihsan is thus defined as "the abandonment of one legal ruling for another which is considered better on the basis of the Qur'an, Sunna or ijma'.” The Hanafi jurist Abu'l-Hassan al-Karkhi's (d. 340H) definition, which is considered to be comprehensive, is as follows:


. . .

* Published with kind permission of the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS) Malaysia.

** This essay is derived, for the most part, from my book, entitled Istihsan (Juristic Preference) and its Application to Contemporary Issues, Jeddah: Islamic Research and Training institute, 1997, 148 pp.


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
[2014] 1 LNS(A) ii MALAYSIA

ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND SEAT OF ARBITRATION

by

ARUNACHALAM KASI*


1. Abstract

It is beyond doubt that the current policy is in promotion of arbitration as a very powerful alternative dispute resolution system. Such emergence of a powerful alternative dispute resolution mechanism has become inevitable in light of the increasing number of cases in the courts. UNCITRAL model law was made by the United Nations for adoption by the member states to promote arbitration. Malaysia substantially did so by legislating the Arbitration Act 2005. This Act has generally made stay of court proceedings in favour of arbitration agreement mandatory as opposed to the position of the law prior to this whereby the stay was discretionary. However in the current Act, there are some requisites as to seat of arbitration before the stay is granted. It appears that the result of these requisites may be quite unintended. It is the object of this article to analyse the requisites as to the seat, and its result whether intended or unintended.

2. Requirement as to seat of arbitration

In the study of section 10(1), it is important to understand the concept of seat of arbitration and the concept of domestic and international arbitrations, because the application of section 10(1) to a particular arbitration agreement is dependent on these concepts.


. . .

* Advocate & Solicitor


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
x