Back to Top


CLJ Logo CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2014, Vol 06
07 February 2014

Print this page
Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Cases Of The Week

a) MASTER BRISBANE ITANG v. ROBINSON LEE & ORS

b) AHMAD ZUBAIR HJ MURSHID v. PP

c) PP lwn. ISMAIL MELI [2013] 2 SMC 212

2. Latest Cases

a) Legal Network Series

b) CLJ 2014 Volume 1 (Part 6)

3. Articles

a) Legal Network Series Article

4. Legislation Highlights

a) Principal Acts

b) Amending Acts

c) PU(A)

d) PU(B)


CASES OF THE WEEK

MASTER BRISBANE ITANG v. ROBINSON LEE & ORS
COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
HISHAMUDIN MOHD YUNUS JCA, ABDUL WAHAB PATAIL JCA, BALIA YUSOF WAHI JCA
[CIVIL APPEAL NO: Q-01-443-10-2012]
11 OCTOBER 2013

TORT: Negligence - Duty of care - Failure to vaccinate pupils of school against Japanese Encephalitis (JE) virus - Whether there is specific legislation imposing duty on Ministry of Health to immunise school pupils - Whether there had been recent outbreak of JE virus in areas nearby school - Implementation of vaccination program - Whether required cooperation of other governmental agencies - Shortages of vaccines and budget constraints - Factors considered - Whether fair and reasonable to impose common law duty of care on Ministry of Health to immunise plaintiff - Whether would open floodgate of litigation

AHMAD ZUBAIR HJ MURSHID v. PP
COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
AZAHAR MOHAMED JCA, ROHANA YUSUF JCA, HAMID SULTAN ABU BACKER JCA
[CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: W-09-102-03-2013]
1 NOVEMBER 2013

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out - Application for - Application to set aside and strike off charges against appellant - Charges - Whether flawed and defective - Whether specified direction of law or legal contract on discharge of trust - Whether fatal - Whether premature for court to decide on issues raised - Whether prosecution precluded from adducing relevant evidence - Whether proper case for court to exercise inherent powers to quash charges - Whether charges mala fide, oppressive and an abuse of court process - Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 51A, 156 & 173

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: Courts - Jurisdiction - Inherent powers to set aside and quash charges - Whether court has general power to quash charge where an indictment has been preferred - Whether court could only exercise its inherent powers when there is miscarriage of justice - Whether charges mala fide, oppressive and an abuse of court process

PP lwn. ISMAIL MELI [2013] 2 SMC 212
MAHKAMAH SESYEN, KOTA BHARU
AZMAN MUSTAPHA HS
[KES JENAYAH NO: SKB(A)62-03-2011]
12 OGOS 2012

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH: Kanun Keseksaan - Seksyen 326 - Mengakibatkan kecederaan parah - Sama ada kes prima facie dibuktikan - Pembelaan - Sama ada keterangan pembelaan menyokong versi tertuduh - Sama ada pembelaan berjaya membangkitkan keraguan munasabah

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Hukuman - Mitigasi - Kesalahan di bawah s. 326 Kanun Keseksaan - Faktor usia - Sama ada relevan - Sama ada wujud provokasi yang bersifat "grave and sudden" - Sama ada faktor mitigasi dipertimbangkan - Sama ada hukuman berat harus dijatuhkan

To view a sample of the Sessions and Magistrates' Cases journal, click here. For product enquiries, contact priority@cljlaw.com.

LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2011] 1 LNS 1786

CHANDRAN MUTHU v. SEK (MALAYSIA) SND BHD & ANOR

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appeal against decision of Sessions Court - Finding that both parties equally liable for accident - Whether position of vehicles after accident was more in tandem and consistent with plaintiff's version - Whether second defendant wholly contributed towards the accident as he had encroached or turned against right of way of motorcyclist when he suddenly turned to the right to make a u-turn - Whether late reporting by plaintiff of accident had adverse bearing on his credibility - Whether Sessions Court Judge wrong in treating late reporting as giving sufficient time to plaintiff to be more creative in making a police report that was in his favour - Whether Sessions Court Judge erred and misdirected herself when she found plaintiff and second defendant equally accountable for causing accident

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appeal against decision of Sessions Court - Damages - Appeal against award of RM18,000 for close intertrochanteric fracture of right femur which resulted in shortening of plaintiff's right lower limb - Whether award was manifestly low - Whether RM40,000, was more appropriate amount for this head of general damages

[2011] 1 LNS 1838

KWAN CHEE HANG SDN BHD & ORS v. ZUNG ZANG WOOD PRODUCTS SDN BHD & ORS & ANOTHER CASES

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Limitation of action - When cause of action accrued - Fraud - Whether plaintiff's claims time barred - Whether plaintiffs entitled to rely on s. 18 of the Sabah Limitation Ordinance - Fraudulent acts committed by 4th Defendant only discovered in 2006 - Whether suits filed in 2008 were within limitation period

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Pleadings - Fraud - Whether Statements of Claim contained necessary material particulars of fraud

EQUITY: Fraud in equity - Fiduciary relationship - Whether fraud committed by 4th Defendant fell under 'equitable fraud' namely, use of power to procure a bargain or gift, resulting in disadvantage to the other party or conflict of interest against a duty arising from a fiduciary relationship - Whether 4th Defendant abused his position as a director to fraudulently procure execution of resolution so that he could gain absolute control over plantation lands for himself and his wife - Whether 4th Defendant's acts were in breach of the Companies Act, 1965 - Whether plaintiffs adduced sufficient evidence to prove the same beyond reasonable doubt

[2011] 1 LNS 1848

PP v. HARINDRAN VEERAJAH & ORS

CRIMINAL LAW: Penal Code - ss. 34, 302 - Murder - Common intention - Prima facie case - Conduct of the 4 accused together with other assailants still at large - Whether the court could draw an irresistible inference that all of them had a common intention to cause the death of the deceased - Whether prosecution succeeded in proving on a prima facie basis the necessary ingredients of the charge against all 4 accused - Whether all 4 accused should be ordered to enter their defence to the charge

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Trial - Defence's story - Statements of 1st, 2nd and 4th accused - Whether their explanations were plausible and cast a doubt on the prosecution case - Whether 3rd accused's defence was inconsistent with his innocence and concocted to extricate him from the serious charge facing him - Whether defence of each of the 4 accused and their combined defence failed to raise a reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case - Whether 4 accused together with rest of assailants still at large had, pursuant to their common intention, caused the death of the deceased - Whether they had, pursuant to their common intention, caused such injuries to the deceased as would in the ordinary course of events cause the death of the deceased - Whether prosecution proved the charges against each of the 4 accused beyond reasonable doubt

[2012] 1 LNS 1304

FIRST ACORN (M) SDN BHD v. LAI KOON TEE

CONTRACT: Sale and purchase of property - Sale and purchase agreement - Termination - Whether enforcement of agreement was conditional upon execution of the conditions precedent within the prescribed period - Whether failure to fulfill these conditions within 3 months rendered agreement unenforceable - Whether agreement lapsed due to effluxion of time - Whether it was terminated in accordance with clause in agreement

LAND LAW: Caveats - Removal of - Whether caveat should be removed - Whether defendant had any right over the property and locus to caveat the property - Whether delay of about 16 months in instituting proceedings after lodgment of the caveat without any reasonable explanation was inordinate - Whether caveat should be removed - Whether plaintiff should be further restrained from dealing with the property

[2013] 1 LNS 425

CHAN YOKE SIM v. CHOONG TECK FOOK & ORS

TORT: Defamation - Libel - Whether words or statements complained of as contained in the articles referred to plaintiff - Whether words or statements as contained in the articles were defamatory - Whether words or statements contained in the articles were published to a third party - Defence - Qualified privilege - Whether defendants were protected by defence of qualified privilege - Whether there was presence of malice to negate defence of qualified privilege

CLJ 2014 Volume 1 (Part 6)

COURT

COURT OF APPEAL

Ahmad Zubair Hj Murshid v. PP
Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA
(Civil Procedure; Constitutional Law - Courts - Jurisdiction - Inherent powers to set aside and quash charges) [2014] 1 CLJ 697 [CA]

Bandahala Undik v. PP
Ramly Ali, Mohtarudin Baki, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA
(Criminal Law; Evidence - Murder - Dying declaration – Admissibility) [2014] 1 CLJ 708 [CA]

Master Brisbane Itang v. Robinson Lee & Ors
Hishamudin Mohd Yunus, Abdul Wahab Patail, Balia Yusof Wahi JJCA
(Tort - Negligence - Duty of care - Vaccination against Japanese Encephalitis virus) [2014] 1 CLJ 726 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Majlis Bandaraya Melaka Bersejarah lwn. Eyo-Li Sdn Bhd
Zulkifli Bakar H
(Kerajaan Tempatan; Perkataan Dan Istilah - Cukai taksiran - Tuntutan) [2014] 1 CLJ 733 [HC]

Mohd Saufi Taib & Ors v. CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd
Lau Bee Lan J
(Contract; Tort - Breach - Defamation - Libel) [2014] 1 CLJ 774 [HC]

NBH Sdn Bhd v. Tanjung Balai Quarry Sdn Bhd
SM Komathy Suppiah JC
(Civil Procedure - Amendment - Order - Res judicata - Principles) [2014] 1 CLJ 793 [HC]

Seema Development Sdn Bhd v. Mah Kim Chye
Lee Swee Seng JC
(Civil Procedure; Limitation - Execution - Delay - Limitation of 12 years) [2014] 1 CLJ 804 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Amendment - Order - Application to amend order - Claim for judgment sum including post-judgment interest - Claim allowed but no provision nor mention on post-judgment interest made in grounds of judgment and order - Whether plaintiff entitled to post-judgment interest - Whether order could be amended to insert additional clause requiring defendant to pay post-judgment interest - `Slip rule' - Whether application within scope of slip rule - Whether accidental omission in judgment could be corrected under slip rule by judge who did not pronounce it - Rules of Court 2012, O. 20 r. 11
NBH Sdn Bhd v. Tanjung Balai Quarry Sdn Bhd
(SM Komathy Suppiah JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 793 [HC]

Execution - Delay - Limitation of 12 years - Application for leave to execute judgment after 12 years - Whether allowed - Whether defendant should have appealed against ex parte order for leave - Whether doctrine of estoppel applied to extend period of 12 years - Limitation Act 1953, s. 6(3)
Seema Development Sdn Bhd v. Mah Kim Chye
(Lee Swee Seng JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 804 [HC]

Res judicata - Principles - Claim for judgment sum including post-judgment interest - Claim allowed but no provision nor mention on post-judgment interest made in grounds of judgment and order - Defendant's refusal to pay post-judgment interest - Application to amend order to insert additional clause requiring defendant to pay post-judgment interest - Whether application barred by doctrine of res judicata
NBH Sdn Bhd v. Tanjung Balai Quarry Sdn Bhd
(SM Komathy Suppiah JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 793 [HC]

Striking out - Application for - Application to set aside and strike off charges against appellant - Charges - Whether flawed and defective - Whether specified direction of law or legal contract on discharge of trust - Whether fatal - Whether premature for court to decide on issues raised - Whether prosecution precluded from adducing relevant evidence - Whether proper case for court to exercise inherent powers to quash charges - Whether charges mala fide, oppressive and an abuse of court process - Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 51A, 156 & 173
Ahmad Zubair Hj Murshid v. PP
(Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 1 CLJ 697 [CA]

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Courts - Jurisdiction - Inherent powers to set aside and quash charges - Whether court has general power to quash charge where an indictment has been preferred - Whether court could only exercise its inherent powers when there is miscarriage of justice - Whether charges mala fide, oppressive and an abuse of court process
Ahmad Zubair Hj Murshid v. PP
(Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 1 CLJ 697 [CA]

CONTRACT

Breach - Negligence - Failure to credit cheques - Whether unforeseeable technical problems in Cheque Truncation and Conversion System resulted in delay of crediting cheques - Whether there were sufficient funds in client's current account
Mohd Saufi Taib & Ors v. CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd
(Lau Bee Lan J) [2014] 1 CLJ 774 [HC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Murder - Penal Code, s. 302 - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Dying declaration - Identification of accused - Relevancy of statement - Cause of death - Whether breached hearsay rule - Whether concept of res gestae, dying declaration and provision under s. 32(1)(a) Evidence Act 1950 assisted prosecution to sustain charge - Failure to tender medical or post mortem report - Failure to call medical officer who ascertained cause of death to testify - Whether medical officer's report admitted under s. 32(1)(j) Evidence Act 1950 - Whether cause of death can be ascertained by direct evidence or patent injuries on body - Whether conviction and sentence affirmed
Bandahala Undik v. PP
(Ramly Ali, Mohtarudin Baki, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 1 CLJ 708 [CA]

EVIDENCE

Dying declaration - Admissibility - Evidence Act 1950, s. 32(1)(a) - Whether Evidence Act 1950 defines dying declaration - Whether statement must consists of cause of death or transaction which resulted in death - Whether assisted prosecution to sustain charge of murder - Legal maxim - Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire
Bandahala Undik v. PP
(Ramly Ali, Mohtarudin Baki, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 1 CLJ 708 [CA]

LIMITATION

Execution of judgment - Limitation of 12 years - Whether application for leave to execute judgment after 12 years ought to be set aside - Whether defendant should have appealed against ex parte order for leave - Whether doctrine of estoppel applied to extend period of 12 years - Limitation Act 1953, s. 6(3)
Seema Development Sdn Bhd v. Mah Kim Chye
(Lee Swee Seng JC) [2014] 1 CLJ 804 [HC]

TORT

Defamation - Libel - Publication of words on return cheque advice - Whether words "refer to drawer" amounted to libel - Whether defence of qualified privilege applicable
Mohd Saufi Taib & Ors v. CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd
(Lau Bee Lan J) [2014] 1 CLJ 774 [HC]

Negligence - Duty of care - Failure to vaccinate pupils of school against Japanese Encephalitis (JE) virus - Whether there is specific legislation imposing duty on Ministry of Health to immunise school pupils - Whether there had been recent outbreak of JE virus in areas nearby school - Implementation of vaccination program - Whether required cooperation of other governmental agencies - Shortages of vaccines and budget constraints - Factors considered - Whether fair and reasonable to impose common law duty of care on Ministry of Health to immunise plaintiff - Whether would open floodgate of litigation
Master Brisbane Itang v. Robinson Lee & Ors
(Hishamudin Mohd Yunus, Abdul Wahab Patail, Balia Yusof Wahi JJCA) [2014] 1 CLJ 726 [CA]

INDEKS PERKARA

KERAJAAN TEMPATAN

Cukai taksiran - Tuntutan - Pegangan - Parsel dalam kompleks membeli-belah - Harta tanpa hak milik strata - Pemilikan harta dibuktikan oleh perjanjian jual beli dan perjanjian penyerahanhak - Sama ada cukai taksiran perlu dibayar oleh pemilik harta atau pemilik berdaftar tanah kompleks membeli-belah - Akta Kerajaan Tempatan 1976
Majlis Bandaraya Melaka Bersejarah lwn. Eyo-Li Sdn Bhd
(Zulkifli Bakar H) [2014] 1 CLJ 733 [HC]

Perkataan dan ISTILAH

"any person liable to pay the same" - Makna - Tunggakan cukai - Sama ada merujuk kepada "current owners" - Akta Kerajaan Tempatan 1976, s. 156
Majlis Bandaraya Melaka Bersejarah lwn. Eyo-Li Sdn Bhd
(Zulkifli Bakar H) [2014] 1 CLJ 733 [HC]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article

1. PLEASE CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY* [Read excerpt]
    by: YBM TENGKU RAZALEIGH HAMZAH [2014] 1 LNS(A) v

2. DOCTRINE OF PROPORTIONALITY OF PUNISHMENT
    IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS PRACTICE
[Read excerpt]
    by: CHEAH CHOO KHENG* [2014] 1 LNS(A) vi

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Repealing
ACT 761 Finance Act 2014 See s 3 for the Income Tax Act; s 33 for the Stamp Act; s 36 for the Petroleum (Income Tax) Act; s 44 for the Real Property Gains Tax Act and s 50 for the Labuan Business Activity Tax Act -Nil-
ACT 760 Fees (Department Of Museums Malaysia)
(Validation) Act 2014
1 January 1991 to 11 June 2012 -Nil-
ACT 759 Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 277/2013] - except para(s) 1 to 10 of Schedule 9 and para(s) 13 to 19 of Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 758 Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 276/2013] - except s 129 and Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 757 Strata Management Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-

Amending Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1458 Supply Act 2014 1 January 2014
ACT A1456 Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT 166
ACT A1455 Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2012 (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT A1444
ACT A1454 Supplementary Supply (2013) Act 2013 2 November 2013
ACT A1453 Supplementary Supply (2012) Act 2013 7 September 2013

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 40/2014 Factories And Machinery (Steam Boiler And Unfired Pressure Vessel) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 30 January 2014 4 February 2014 PU(A) 5/1970
PU(A) 39/2014 Employees' Social Security (Minimum Average Monthly Wage) Regulations 2014 30 January 2014 1 January 2012 ACT 4
PU(A) 38/2014 Customs (Values) (Palm Kernel) Order 2014 30 January 2014 1 February 2014 to 28 February 2014 ACT 235
PU(A) 37/2014 Water Services Industry (Water Services Deposits, Fees And Charges) Regulations 2014 30 January 2014 1 February 2014 ACT 655
PU(A) 36/2014 Water Services Industry (Water Reticulation And Plumbing) Rules 2014 30 January 2014 1 February 2014 ACT 655

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 43/2014 Determination Of Electoral Roll For The By-Election Of N. 25 Kajang 5 February 2014 6 February 2014 PU(A) 293/2002
PU(B) 42/2014 Notification Under Paragraph 3(1)(e) 5 February 2014 6 February 2014 PU(A) 185/2003
PU(B) 41/2014 Temporary Exercise Of Ministerial Functions 4 February 2014 Specified in column (1) of the Schedule ACT 388
PU(B) 40/2014 Notice To Third Parties 30 January 2014 31 January 2014 ACT 613
PU(B) 39/2014 Appointment Of Pesticides Licensing Officers 30 January 2014 1 February 2014 ACT 149
[2014] 1 LNS(A) v MALAYSIA

PLEASE CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY*

by

YBM TENGKU RAZALEIGH HAMZAH


I must say that I welcome this opportunity to participate at this book launch event. I like to thank the organisers, particularly Puan Sheila Ainon Yusoff, who, incidentally, is one of the compilers of this book' “ISLAMIC TRANSACTIONS AND FINANCE: Principles and Developments” who persistently persuaded me to attend this function. I was picked and given the honour to say a few words at this function probably because I was associated with the introduction of Islamic Finance and Banking and Takaful in Malaysia soon after I was elected Chairman of the Islamic Development Bank under the aegis of O.I.C. In 1977, I invited Prince Mohammed Al-Malek Feisal of Saudi Arabia, who is the ardent proponent of Syariah-Compliant Islamic Banking and Finance System and his team of experts to come to Malaysia to assist us in the setting up of Islamic banking in Malaysia in the early 80's. The book we are launching today is a collection of essays, based on research and practice of Islamic finance in the country and I am sure will be of great assistance to Islamic banking practitioners and students.

2. It is worth reiterating that the Islamic economic system is neither capitalistic nor socialistic in nature. It is a system that has been provided by the Quran and the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet Muhammad SAW. It is the ethical system that operates on the basis of shared risk and profit to the lender and the borrower.


. . .

* At The Book Launch Organised by The International Institute Of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS) / Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. on Thursday, 23 rd January 2014 at 3:30 P.M., at Conference Hall Of IAIS Malaysia, Jalan Ilmu Off, Jalan Universiti, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
[2014] 1 LNS(A) vi MALAYSIA

DOCTRINE OF PROPORTIONALITY OF PUNISHMENT IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS PRACTICE

by

CHEAH CHOO KHENG*


The Federal Court in Norizan Bakar v. Panzana Enterprise Sdn Bhd [2013] 9 CLJ 409 (“this instant case”) had confirmed that the Industrial Court could substitute its own view, in place of the employer’s view, as to what should be the appropriate penalty for an employee’s misconduct. The Industrial Court is empowered to replace the penalty of dismissal by the employer with a lesser penalty, not amounting to dismissal, even though the employer has specified dismissal as penalty for the particular misconduct in its disciplinary rules and regulations.

The Federal Court in this instant case had also made a distinction between the statutory provisions applicable for dismissal of the public sector employees and the private sector employees. It held that the dismissal process for the public sector employee is governed by Articles 135 and 132 of the Federal Constituion; whereas that of the private sector employee is governed by section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (“the IRA”).


. . .

* BSc Edu, LLB Hons, CLP, LLM. Advocate & Solicitor


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
x