Back to Top


CLJ Logo CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2014, Vol 09
28 February 2014

Print this page
Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Cases Of The Week

a) AZIZAH ABDUL MANAN & ORS v. DR NORLELAWATI AB LATIP & ORS

b) TENAGA NASIONAL BHD lwn. DOL CUBE ICE SDN BHD [2013] 2 SMC 293

2. Latest Cases

a) Legal Network Series

b) CLJ 2014 Volume 2 (Part 1)

3. Articles

a) Legal Network Series Article

4. Legislation Highlights

a) Principal Acts

b) Amending Acts

c) PU(A)

d) PU(B)


APPEAL UPDATE

PP v. GAN BOON AUN & ANOR [2014] 1 CLJ 1048 [CA]

[On 24 September 2013, the Federal Court in Criminal Appeal No. 05-123-06/2013 (W) allowed the appeal by the appellant, Khiudin bin Mohd, and set aside the order of the Court of Appeal dated 24 April 2013 in respect of the amendment to the Notice of Appeal and extension of time to file the said Notice of Appeal out of time. To view the sealed Order, click here

CASES OF THE WEEK

AZIZAH ABDUL MANAN & ORS v. DR NORLELAWATI AB LATIP & ORS
HIGH COURT MALAYA, JOHOR BAHRU
ABDUL RAHMAN SEBLI J
[CIVIL SUIT NO: 21NCVC-11-03-2012]
27 SEPTEMBER 2013

TORT: Negligence - Medical negligence - Ectopic pregnancy - Deceased complained of abdominal pain - Condition of deceased - Conservative management approach - Whether deceased suitable for such approach - Failure to immediately deal with deceased's life-threatening condition - Deceased suffered from upper respiratory throat infection - Operation carried out under emergency situation - Deceased died about seven months later due to sepsis secondary to pneumonia and sacral sore - Deceased's consent for operation - Whether defendants absolved from liability - Whether deceased's death could be traced back to risk created by defendants in managing ectopic pregnancy - Whether damages awarded

TORT: Negligence - Damages - Medical negligence - Ectopic pregnancy - Deceased suffered from upper respiratory throat infection - Operation carried out under emergency situation - Deceased died about seven months later due to sepsis secondary to pneumonia and sacral sore - Whether deceased's death could be traced back to risk created by defendants in managing ectopic pregnancy - Claim for funeral expenses, bereavement, loss of support, nursing care, pain and suffering and medical expenses - Whether damages awarded

TENAGA NASIONAL BHD lwn. DOL CUBE ICE SDN BHD [2013] 2 SMC 293
MAHKAMAH SESYEN, JOHOR BAHRU
ISHAK BAKRI HS
[SAMAN NO: 52-1523-2011]
31 MEI 2012

UTILITI-UTILITI: Pembekalan - Usikan meter - Tuntutan untuk bil kebelakang - Sama ada terdapat usikan pada pepasangan meter - Sama ada defendan bertanggungjawab terhadap usikan meter - Sama ada defendan bertanggungjawab membayar jumlah yang dituntut oleh plaintif - Sama ada pemeriksaan perlu dijalankan oleh seorang penyelia elektrik - Sama ada penyata bil kebelakang adalah keterangan prima facie berkenaan jumlah terhutang yang perlu dibayar - Sama ada tuntutan plaintif dibenarkan

To view a sample of the Sessions and Magistrates' Cases journal, click here. For product enquiries, contact priority@cljlaw.com.

LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2012] 1 LNS 752

NUMPANG SUNTAI & ORS v. QUALITY CONCRETE HOLDINGS BERHAD & ORS

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Res judicata - Similar proceedings - Whether plaintiffs could maintain present suit because part of their claim here was also the subject of adjudication in Suit No. 22-118-2007 - Whether some plaintiffs, who resided in a different area and had laid claim to a much larger NCR area, in the absence of any agreement, must be considered privies of the seven plaintiffs in earlier suit - Whether doctrine of res judicata could be applied to defeat plaintiffs' claim

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Declaration - Application for - Whether correct procedure in the circumstances - Whether declaration for NCR should be granted - Whether writ action instituted by plaintiffs was wrong mode of commencement - Whether plaintiffs should have proceeded by way of judicial review to protect their rights - Whether a declaratory order that plaintiffs possessed NCR should be granted

NATIVE LAW AND CUSTOM: Land dispute - Customary rights over land - Whether plaintiffs established native customary rights over land in question - Whether plaintiffs entitled to move the courts to defend their quiet enjoyment of it in accordance with their customary practices

TORT: Vicarious liability - Government liability - Failure to identify negligent government officers - Government officers in question not named, identified or personally joined as defendants - Whether claim for declaratory prayers based on tort of breach of fiduciary duty and negligence could be sustained

[2012] 1 LNS 756

NETWORK PET PRODUCTS (M) SDN BHD v. ROYAL CANIN SAS & ANOR

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Inter parte application - Whether an injunction should be granted to restrain defendant from distributing its own products which was in defendant's trademark name - Whether balance of convenience was in defendant's favour - Whether plaintiff had shown irreparable harm or damage would be caused to them and that such harm would place them in an irretrievable position incapable of remedy by way of damages

[2012] 1 LNS 759

DER NICHE SDN BHD v. KIARAVILLE JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Application for - To prevent defendant from interfering with plaintiff's catering business - LOA giving tenancy to run cafeteria at defendant's premises awarded to Der Niche and not plaintiff - Whether there was a bona fide serious question to be tried - Whether plaintiff's application should be dismissed on this ground alone - Where justice of the matter or balance of convenience lay - Whether balance of convenience lay in favour of defendant - Whether any justification for an injunction to be granted

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Application for - Erinford injunction - Oral application without Counsel taking prior instructions from plaintiff, unsupported by affidavit evidence and mainly relying on mere statements from the Bar - Whether oral application should be allowed - Whether any necessity to maintain status quo - Whether special circumstances shown to justify the Erinford injunction being granted - Whether there was a likelihood of a successful appeal being rendered nugatory - Whether damages were an adequate remedy

[2012] 1 LNS 766

TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v. API-API AQUACULTURE SDN BHD

CONTRACT: Breach - Agreement - Contract to provide supply of electricity - Defendant's appeal on assessment of quantum by deputy registrar - Whether there was any undercharging of electricity usage by defendant due to fault of the meter - Whether there was proof that offence under the Electricity Supply Act 1990, ss. 37(1), (3) and (14) had been committed - Whether consent terms negated any offence as envisaged by these sections - Whether plaintiff's reliance ons. 38(3) of the Electricity Supply Act 1990 to proceed with assessment could be sustained

[2012] 1 LNS 745

RAYMOND FAIZAL AMINUDDIN v. PP

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appeal against sentence - Gang robbery - Public interest - Appellant pleaded guilty to charge, was a first offender, was drunk at time of commission of offence and merely pointed knife at victim with no injuries caused - Whether sentence imposed by lower court was severe and excessive especially since no injury was caused - Whether sentence of whipping of 3 strokes should be removed and sentence of 8 years' imprisonment maintained

CLJ 2014 Volume 2 (Part 1)

COURT

FEDERAL COURT

Winstech Engineering Sdn Bhd v. ESPL (M) Sdn Bhd
Arifin Zakaria CJ, Richard Malanjum CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdull Hamid Embong, Hasan Lah FCJJ
(Company Law - Winding up - Companies Act 1965, ss. 226(3), 236(2)(a) & 236(3)) [2014] 2 CLJ 1 [FC]

COURT OF APPEAL

Kobra Taba Seidali v. PP
Mohtarudin Baki, Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA
(Criminal Law - Failure to rebut 'Alcontara Notice' - Whether opportunity of fair trial compromised by prosecution) [2014] 2 CLJ 12 [CA]

Kunalan Kandasamy lwn. PP
Abdul Malik Ishak, Azahar Mohamed, Mohd Zawawi Salleh HHMR
(Undang-undang Jenayah; Prosedur Jenayah - Seksyen 302 - - Kegagalan memanggil saksi penting - Sama ada memudaratkan kes dan memprejudiskan perayu) [2014] 2 CLJ 25 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Azizah Abdul Manan & Ors v. Dr Norlelawati AB Latip & Ors
Abdul Rahman Sebli J
(Tort - Negligence - Medical negligence - Deceased's consent for operation - Whether defendants absolved from liability) [2014] 2 CLJ 44 [HC]

PP v. Hassan Hj Ali Basri
Ravinthran Paramaguru J
(Criminal Law - Penal Code - Omission to give information in respect of s. 130C offence) [2014] 2 CLJ 72 [HC]

Stephane-Henri Maurice Jacques Gregoire v. Noraini Abdul Murat
Rosilah Yop JC
(Civil Procedure - Security for costs - Whether sum for security of costs reasonable - Rules of Court 2012, O. 23 r. 1) [2014] 2 CLJ 115 [HC]

Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Kerajaan Negeri Selangor; Kerajaan Malaysia (Third Party) (No 2)
Abu Bakar Jais JC
(Civil Procedure - Pleadings - Whether satisfied principles laid down in Yamaha Motor Co Ltd v. Yamaha Malaysia Sdn Bhd) [2014] 2 CLJ 125 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Amendment - Pleadings - Amendment to add co-plaintiff - Whether satisfied principles laid down in Yamaha Motor Co Ltd v. Yamaha Malaysia Sdn Bhd - Whether amendments sought bona fide - Whether prejudice caused could be compensated with costs - Whether character of suit would be changed to another and inconsistent character
Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd v. Kerajaan Negeri Selangor; Kerajaan Malaysia (Third Party) (No 2)
(Abu Bakar Jais JC) [2014] 2 CLJ 125 [HC]

Security for costs - Application for - Plaintiff claimed against defendant for slander - Claim for damages - Plaintiff a Belgian citizen with no permanent address nor assets within jurisdiction of court - Whether defendant had meritorious defence to plaintiff's claim - Whether there was reason to believe that plaintiff was unable to pay defendant's cost to defend action - Whether sum for security of costs reasonable - Rules of Court 2012, O. 23 r. 1
Stephane-Henri Maurice Jacques Gregoire v. Noraini Abdul Murat
(Rosilah Yop JC) [2014] 2 CLJ 115 [HC]

COMPANY LAW

Winding up - Leave to appeal - Application for - Application filed prior to obtaining sanction by official receiver - Whether sanction applied retrospectively - Grant of leave - Whether justified - Whether respondent prejudiced by application - Companies Act 1965, ss. 226(3), 236(2)(a) & 236(3)
Winstech Engineering Sdn Bhd v. ESPL (M) Sdn Bhd
(Arifin Zakaria CJ, Richard Malanjum CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdull Hamid Embong, Hasan Lah, Mohamed Apandi Ali FCJJ) [2014] 2 CLJ 1 [FC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking - Conviction and sentence - Appeal against - Prima facie case - Whether established - Failure of prosecution to call material witness or submit copy of witness statement - Criminal Procedure Code, s. 112 - Whether fatal - Failure to rebut 'Alcontara Notice' - Whether opportunity of fair trial compromised by prosecution - Failure of trial judge to consider defence case in right perspective - Whether decision to convict safe
Kobra Taba Seidali v. PP
(Mohtarudin Baki, Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 2 CLJ 12 [CA]

Penal Code - Section 130C - Omission to give information in respect of s. 130C offence - Whether ingredients of offence made out - Whether accused was in possession of information - Whether intercepted telephone conversation admissible to prove offence - Whether accused had reasons to believe that offence of 'terrorist act' would be committed - Whether accused legally bound to pass information to superiors - Whether motive proven
PP v. Hassan Hj Ali Basri
(Ravinthran Paramaguru J) [2014] 2 CLJ 72 [HC]

Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 - Section 6(1) - Whether only officer authorised by Public Prosecutor could intercept communications - Whether sufficient if interception carried out under direction and supervision of officer - Whether non-verbatim transcript of telephone conversation admissible
PP v. Hassan Hj Ali Basri
(Ravinthran Paramaguru J) [2014] 2 CLJ 72 [HC]

TORT

Negligence - Damages - Medical negligence - Ectopic pregnancy - Deceased suffered from upper respiratory throat infection - Operation carried out under emergency situation - Deceased died about seven months later due to sepsis secondary to pneumonia and sacral sore - Whether deceased's death could be traced back to risk created by defendants in managing ectopic pregnancy - Claim for funeral expenses, bereavement, loss of support, nursing care, pain and suffering and medical expenses - Whether damages awarded
Azizah Abdul Manan & Ors v. Dr Norlelawati AB Latip & Ors
(Abdul Rahman Sebli J) [2014] 2 CLJ 44 [HC]

Negligence - Medical negligence - Ectopic pregnancy - Deceased complained of abdominal pain - Condition of deceased - Conservative management approach - Whether deceased suitable for such approach - Failure to immediately deal with deceased's life-threatening condition - Deceased suffered from upper respiratory throat infection - Operation carried out under emergency situation - Deceased died about seven months later due to sepsis secondary to pneumonia and sacral sore - Deceased's consent for operation - Whether defendants absolved from liability - Whether deceased's death could be traced back to risk created by defendants in managing ectopic pregnancy - Whether damages awarded
Azizah Abdul Manan & Ors v. Dr Norlelawati AB Latip & Ors
(Abdul Rahman Sebli J) [2014] 2 CLJ 44 [HC]

INDEKS PERKARA

PROSEDUR JENAYAH

Perbicaraan - Bunuh - Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman - Sama ada perayu telah mendapat perbicaraan yang adil - Kegagalan memanggil saksi penting - Sama ada memudaratkan kes dan memprejudiskan perayu - Akta Keterangan 1950, s. 114(g) - Sama ada sepatutnya digunakan terhadap pihak pendakwaan - Sama ada tidak selamat untuk mengekalkan sabitan dan hukuman
Kunalan Kandasamy lwn. PP
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Azahar Mohamed, Mohd Zawawi Salleh HHMR) [2014] 2 CLJ 25 [CA]

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH

Kanun Keseksaan - Seksyen 302 - Bunuh - Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman - Sama ada perayu telah mendapat perbicaraan yang adil - Kegagalan memanggil saksi penting - Sama ada memudaratkan kes dan memprejudiskan perayu - Akta Keterangan 1950, s. 114(g) - Sama ada sepatutnya digunakan terhadap pihak pendakwaan - Sama ada tidak selamat untuk mengekalkan sabitan dan hukuman
Kunalan Kandasamy lwn. PP
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Azahar Mohamed, Mohd Zawawi Salleh HHMR) [2014] 2 CLJ 25 [CA]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article

1. CAN THE HUDUD BE GIVEN A FRESH INTERPRETATION?* [Read excerpt]
    by: MOHAMMAD HASHIM KAMALI** [2014] 1 LNS(A) xi

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Repealing
ACT 761 Finance Act 2014 See s 3 for the Income Tax Act; s 33 for the Stamp Act; s 36 for the Petroleum (Income Tax) Act; s 44 for the Real Property Gains Tax Act and s 50 for the Labuan Business Activity Tax Act -Nil-
ACT 760 Fees (Department Of Museums Malaysia)
(Validation) Act 2014
1 January 1991 to 11 June 2012 -Nil-
ACT 759 Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 277/2013] - except para(s) 1 to 10 of Schedule 9 and para(s) 13 to 19 of Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 758 Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 276/2013] - except s 129 and Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 757 Strata Management Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-

Amending Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1458 Supply Act 2014 1 January 2014
ACT A1457 Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2014 15 February 2014 ACT 234
ACT A1456 Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT 166
ACT A1455 Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2012 (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT A1444
ACT A1454 Supplementary Supply (2013) Act 2013 2 November 2013

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 50/2014 Loans Guarantee (Bodies Corporate) (Remission Of Tax And Stamp Duty) Order 2014 25 February 2014 26 February 2014 ACT 96
PU(A) 49/2014 Anti-Money Laundering And Anti-Terrorism Financing (Security Council Resolutions) (Al-Qaida And Taliban) Order 2011 - Corrigendum 25 February 2014 26 February 2014 PU(A) 402/2011
PU(A) 48/2014 Dental (Amendment Of Second Schedule) Order 2014 20 February 2014 21 February 2014 ACT 51
PU(A) 47/2014 Customs (Values) (Crude Petroleum Oil) (No. 5) Order 2014 20 February 2014 20 February 2014 to 5 March 2014 ACT 235
PU(A) 46/2014 Factories And Machinery (Exemption To Petronas Gas Berhad, Gas Processing Plant 1, Kerteh, Terengganu) Order 2014 19 February 2014 20 February 2014 ACT 139

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 63/2014 Appointment Of Document Examiner 25 February 2014 25 February 2014 ACT 593
PU(B) 62/2014 Notification Of Approved Officers Under Section 39 25 February 2014 26 February 2014 ACT 532
PU(B) 61/2014 Appointment Under Section 3 24 February 2014 15 February 2014 ACT 19
PU(B) 60/2014 Appointment Under Section 3 24 February 2014 15 February 2014 ACT 19
PU(B) 59/2014 List Of Medical Assistants 21 February 2014 22 February 2014 ACT 180
[2014] 1 LNS(A) xi MALAYSIA

CAN THE HUDUD BE GIVEN A FRESH INTERPRETATION?*

by

MOHAMMAD HASHIM KAMALI**


The issue I raise below is over the scriptural, as opposed to the juristic, understanding of the hudud, and what I am proposing is a revision of the whole concept from a Quranic perspective that reflect on the following four points.

Terminology

Let me say first that hudud (pl. of hadd – limits) in the sense strictly of penal sanctions do not occur in the Quran. ‘Hudud’ are mentioned 14 times in the Holy Book, all in the sense, however, of limits of proper behavior that must be observed in a variety of contexts. Six of the 14 instances of hudud in the Quran occur in just one passage (2:229-30) in the context of marital relations and limits that the spouses must observe in the events of estrangement, separation and divorce. The punitive connotation of hudud can admittedly be subsumed under the concept of limits, as penalties are also markers and limits that separate acceptable behaviour from crime. But to reserve the hudud entirely for certain types of punishments is a juristic convention that does not originate in the Quran.

Number of Hudud offences

Hadd is defined as an offence for which a specified punishment is stipulated in the Quran or authentic hadith. The Quran stipulates such punishments for four offences, namely adultery, theft, slanderous accusation and highway robbery. Yet the fiqh (Islamic law) blueprint raises this number to six, thus adding wine drinking and apostasy (and according to some seven - adding mutiny). The text condemns these as heinous behaviour which must be avoided but provides no punishment for them. This is yet another point of divergence between the fiqh tradition and the more restrictive approach the Quran takes to punishments. Modern criminal law and jurisprudence also advise a restrictive approach to punishments.


. . .

* Published with kind permission of the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS) Malaysia.

** Mohammad Hashim Kamali is Founding Chairman and CEO of the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies Malaysia.


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
[2014] 1 LNS(A) xii MALAYSIA

THE REVISED GUIDELINES ON PRIVATE DEBT SECURITIES AND GUIDELINES ON SUKUK*

by

HONG JAYEEN


IN THIS ARTICLE, HONG JAYEEN LOOKS AT THE REVISED GUIDELINES ON PRIVATE DEBT SECURITIES AND GUIDELINES ON SUKUK.

In tandem with the coming into force of the Capital Markets and Services (Amendment) Act 2012 ("CMSAA 2012"), the Securities Commission ("SC") issued the revised Guidelines on Private Debt Securities ("PDS") and Guidelines on Sukuk (collectively, "the Guidelines") on 28 December 2012 to incorporate and reflect the amendments effected by CMSAA 2012, and also to provide a framework for the newly introduced retail PDS and Sukuk.

The revised Guidelines overhaul and replace the previous PDS Guidelines and the Islamic Securities Guidelines respectively, both of which were issued on 12 July 2011. The revised Guidelines are now re-organised into the following four parts to enhance the clarity of the Guidelines:[1]


. . .

* Published with kind permission of M/s Shearn Delamore & Co.


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
x