CLJ Logo CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2013, Vol 11
15 March 2013

Print this page
Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Case Of The Week

SIME HOK SDN BHD v. SOH POH SHENG

2. Latest Cases

a) Legal Network Series

b) CLJ 2013 Volume 2 (Part 4)

3. Articles

a) Legal Network Series Article

4. Legislation Highlights

a) Principal Acts

b) Amending Acts

c) PU(A)

d) PU(B)


CASE OF THE WEEK

SIME HOK SDN BHD v. SOH POH SHENG
FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA
RAUS SHARIF PCA, AHMAD MAAROP FCJ, ZAINUN ALI FCJ, SULONG MATJERAIE FCJ, JEFFREY TAN FCJ
[CIVIL APPEAL NO: 02-14-2012]
17 JANUARY 2013

CONTRACT: Breach - Performance of contract - Notice - Whether written notice fixing time for performance required to crystallize antecedent breach of party in default - Circumstances when such written notice required - Contracts Act 1950, s. 47

LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2010] 1 LNS 1812

SAPENA TOLAK v. ASNIN UJIP & ANOR

TORT: Negligence - Road accident - Contributory negligence - Whether deceased or 1st respondent wholly liable for accident - Whether 1st respondent contributed towards accident and deceased not solely to be blamed - Whether liability should be apportioned at 80% for appellant and 20% for respondents

TORT: Vicarious liability - Road accident - Whether 2nd respondent vicariously liable for acts of their servant and/or agent, 1st respondent

TORT: Negligence - Road accident - Finding that deceased wholly liable for accident - 1st respondent drove a heavy motor vehicle - Whether 1st respondent in breach of the Road Transport Rules 1959 - Whether 1st respondent negligent in emerging from slow lane to the fast lane to execute a U-turn without a proper lookout - Whether 1st respondent should have exercised extra care and caution

[2011] 1 LNS 1251

WELCO KITCHEN SDN BHD v. PE SETIA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD

CONTRACT: Sale and purchase of property - Breach - Specific performance - Full purchase price settled - Non delivery of vacant possession - Whether there was delay by defendant or it's solicitors in forwarding redemption statement and security documents - Whether plaintiff or it's solicitors delayed making payment of balance of purchase price to defendant - Whether defendant or it's solicitors entitled to charge late payment interest on balance of purchase price - Whether plaintiff entitled to interest for late delivery of vacant possession - Whether defendant could withhold delivery of vacant possession although full purchase price paid by plaintiff - Whether plaintiff entitled to an order of specific performance against defendant for delivery of vacant possession of property

[2011] 1 LNS 1358

ISHAK ISMAIL v. KENANGA INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD & ORS

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out - Writ and statement of claim - Application for - Whether plaintiff's claim against defendants unsustainable and unlikely to succeed - Whether claim frivolous and vexatious - Whether action against defendants should be struck out

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Res judicata - Issues, similarity of - Whether issues here were the same as those raised, litigated and adjudged until the Federal Court in Suit 1869 - Whether plaintiff's action caught by res judicata

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Judgments and orders - Judgment - Impeachment of - Whether there was intentional contrivance to keep plaintiff and the court ignorant of real facts and that judgment was obtained by "connivance" - Whether there was actual fraud on 1st defendant's part - Whether there was wilful concealment or suppression of evidence - Whether plaintiff showed he had a reasonable prospect of success and produced evidence of facts discovered since the judgment complained of - Whether judgment complained of was obtained by fraud or deceit - Whether there was abuse of process by 1st defendant in instituting Suit 1869

TORT: Conspiracy to injure - Bare allegation - No particulars of the purported conspiracy pleaded - Whether frivolous and vexatious

[2011] 1 LNS 1371

COMMERCE TECHNOLOGY VENTURES SDN BHD v. SIOW BOON WOO

COMPANY LAW: Accounts - Financial position of company - Insolvency - Quick assets test - Whether current liabilities of the company exceeded current assets - Overall assets and liabilities test - Whether total liabilities of the company exceeded the total assets of the company - Whether the company was insolvent when the demand was made

CONTRACT: Breach - Agreement - Put option agreement - Damages - Whether defendant's breach entitled plaintiff to substantial damages or nominal damages

[2011] 1 LNS 1372

JUBLILEE KARONOH v. AHMAD PATONG & ORS

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Case management - Directions made by trial judge during pre-trial case management - Failure to comply with direction on expert report - No witness statement by plaintiff given to defendants or the Court - Four trial dates vacated in the past - Whether plaintiff not serious about prosecution of case - Whether plaintiff's suit should be struck out for non compliance of Court's directions during case management

CLJ 2013 Volume 2 (Part 4)

COURT

FEDERAL COURT

Pembinaan Perwira Harta Sdn Bhd v. Letrikon Jaya Bina Sdn Bhd
(Contract - Building sub-contract - Omission of sub-contract works) [2013] 2 CLJ 437 [FC]

Tong Soon Tiong & Ors v. FA Securities Sdn Bhd
(Bankruptcy; Evidence - Capacity of bankrupt - Competency to maintain an action) [2013] 2 CLJ 448 [FC]

COURT OF APPEAL

Baharum Jusoh & Ors v. PP
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Sentencing - Appeals - Common intention) [2013] 2 CLJ 462 [CA]

Mohd Fazli Ismail & Satu Lagi lwn. PP
(Undang-Undang Jenayah; Keterangan - Kecederaan si mati - Saksi - Kredibiliti - Kanun Keseksaan, s. 302) [2013] 2 CLJ 467 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Che Wan Lukman Che Wan Mansor v. Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors
(Administrative Law - Remedies - Habeas corpus - Procedural non-compliance) [2013] 2 CLJ 527 [HC]

Mahfuz Omar v. Inspektor Mohd Zaid Madzizat & Ors & Another Case
(Criminal Procedure; Tort - Arrest - Damages - False imprisonment - Federal Constitution, art. 5(1)) [2013] 2 CLJ 541 [HC]

RHB Investment Bank Bhd & Ors v. Plaza Rakyat Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Banking; Limitation - Loan agreement - Accrual of cause of action - Acknowledgement) [2013] 2 CLJ 556 [HC]

Tokio Marine Insurans (Malaysia) Bhd v. WTS Electrical & Engineering SB & Anor
(Insurance - Motor insurance - Loss or damage to car - Reasonable precautions) [2013] 2 CLJ 595 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Remedies - Habeas corpus - Procedural non-compliance - Whether applicant duly served with documents - Whether there was breach of r. 5(1) Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) (Advisory Board Procedure) Rules 1987 - Whether arrest and detention of applicant done in accordance with s. 3(2)(c) Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985 - Failure to cross out words "pagi/petang" - Whether gave rise to ambiguity as to time of service - Whether Inquiry Officer properly appointed - Whether applicant's continued detention rendered unlawful
Che Wan Lukman Che Wan Mansor v. Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors
(Amelia Tee Abdullah J) [2013] 2 CLJ 527 [HC]

BANKING

Banks and banking business - Loan agreement - Default in loan drawdown - Limitation period - Whether limitation period six years - Whether claim within limitation period - Limitation Act 1953, ss. 6(1)(a), 21(1), 26(2) & 27(1)
RHB Investment Bank Bhd & Ors v. Plaza Rakyat Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof J) [2013] 2 CLJ 556 [HC]

BANKRUPTCY

Capacity of bankrupt - Competency to maintain an action - Whether sanction of Director General of Insolvency mandatory - Whether failure to obtain sanction rendered claim dismissed - Whether action fell under exception of s. 38 Bankruptcy Act 1967
Tong Soon Tiong & Ors v. FA Securities Sdn Bhd
(Zulkefli Makinudin CJ (Malaya), Hashim Yusoff, Suriyadi Halim Omar, Ahmad Maarop, Sulong Matjeraie FCJJ) [2013] 2 CLJ 448 [FC]

CONTRACT

Building sub-contract - Omission of sub-contract works - Whether appellant entitled to omit works of respondent - Whether appellant could lawfully invoke cl. 19 of agreement to omit whole of sub-contract works resulting in termination of sub-contract - Whether cl. 19 a variation clause - Whether cl. 19 a separate and independent clause to reduce scope of sub-contract works
Pembinaan Perwira Harta Sdn Bhd v. Letrikon Jaya Bina Sdn Bhd
(Zulkefli Makinudin CJ (Malaya), Hashim Yusoff, Suriyadi Halim Omar, Ahmad Maarop, Sulong Matjeraie FCJJ) [2013] 2 CLJ 437 [FC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking in 18,054 grams cannabis - Common intention - Failure by trial judge to address issue of common intention - Whether constituted misdirection - Whether appellate intervention warranted - Penal Code, s. 34
Baharum Jusoh & Ors v. PP
(KN Segara, Balia Yusof Wahi, Lim Yee Lan JJCA) [2013] 2 CLJ 462 [CA]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Arrest - Unlawful detention - Plaintiffs were Members of Parliament - Plaintiffs arrested before reaching venue where press conference was being held - Whether plaintiffs' arrest lawful - Whether plaintiffs' actions unlawful - Whether plaintiffs entitled to claim damages - Criminal Procedure Code, s. 105
Mahfuz Omar v. Inspektor Mohd Zaid Madzizat & Ors & Another Case
(Prasad Sandosham Abraham J) [2013] 2 CLJ 541 [HC]

Sentencing - Appeals - Appeal against conviction and sentence for drug trafficking - Common intention - Failure by trial judge to address issue of common intention - Whether constituted misdirection - Whether appellate intervention warranted - Penal Code, s. 34
Baharum Jusoh & Ors v. PP
(KN Segara, Balia Yusof Wahi, Lim Yee Lan JJCA) [2013] 2 CLJ 462 [CA]

EVIDENCE

Witness - Competency - Witness a bankrupt - Whether interested witness - Whether testimony required corroboration - Whether status as bankrupt rendered evidence inadmissible - Evidence Act 1950, s. 118
Tong Soon Tiong & Ors v. FA Securities Sdn Bhd
(Zulkefli Makinudin CJ (Malaya), Hashim Yusoff, Suriyadi Halim Omar, Ahmad Maarop, Sulong Matjeraie FCJJ) [2013] 2 CLJ 448 [FC]

INSURANCE

Motor insurance - Loss or damage to car - Whether respondents took reasonable precautions to prevent loss of vehicles - Factors to consider - Whether evidence adduced to show that respondents' compound subject to theft - Whether respondents had been reckless
Tokio Marine Insurans (Malaysia) Bhd v. WTS Electrical & Engineering SB & Anor
(David Wong Dak Wah J) [2013] 2 CLJ 595 [HC]

LIMITATION

Accrual of cause of action - Acknowledgement - Loan agreement - Default in loan drawdown - Limitation period - Whether limitation period six years - Whether claim within limitation period - Limitation Act 1953, ss. 6(1)(a), 21(1), 26(2) & 27(1)
RHB Investment Bank Bhd & Ors v. Plaza Rakyat Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof J) [2013] 2 CLJ 556 [HC]

TORT

Damages - False imprisonment - Plaintiffs were Members of Parliament - Plaintiffs arrested before reaching venue where press conference was being held - Whether plaintiffs' arrest under s. 105 Criminal Procedure Code lawful - Whether plaintiffs' actions unlawful - Whether plaintiffs' constitutional rights violated - Whether plaintiffs entitled to claim damages - Federal Constitution, art. 5(1)
Mahfuz Omar v. Inspektor Mohd Zaid Madzizat & Ors & Another Case
(Prasad Sandosham Abraham J) [2013] 2 CLJ 541 [HC]

INDEKS PERKARA

KETERANGAN

Saksi - Kredibiliti - Tuduhan bunuh - Ujian bagi menerima keterangan seseorang saksi - Sama ada keterangan saksi utama pendakwaan tidak boleh dipercayai kerana terdapat percanggahan - Sama ada saksi seorang saksi berkepentingan
Mohd Fazli Ismail & Satu Lagi lwn. PP
(Hasan Lah, Ahmad Maarop, Sulaiman Daud HHMR) [2013] 2 CLJ 467 [CA]

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH

Kanun Keseksaan - Seksyen 302 - Bunuh - Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman - Sama ada saksi pendakwaan tidak boleh dipercayai kerana terdapat percanggahan - Sama ada saksi pendakwaan saksi berkepentingan - Kecederaan si mati - Sama ada dilakukan dengan niat untuk membunuh - Sama ada ketiadaan kesan cap jari tertuduh menimbulkan keraguan munasabah - Sama ada keterangan mengenai pengakuan tertuduh boleh diterima
Mohd Fazli Ismail & Satu Lagi lwn. PP
(Hasan Lah, Ahmad Maarop, Sulaiman Daud HHMR) [2013] 2 CLJ 467 [CA]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article

1. THE LAW OF DEFAMATION AND THE DEFENCE OF QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE [Read excerpt]
by: SOO SIEW MEI [2013] 1 LNS(A) xiii

2. IS YOUR BUSINESS COMPETITION LAW COMPLIANT? [Read excerpt]
by: RACHEL BURGESS* [2013] 1 LNS(A) xiv

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Repealing
ACT 753 Minimum Retirement Age Act 2012 1 July 2013
[PU(B) 422/2012]
-Nil-
ACT 754 International Transfer Of Prisoners Act 2012 21 February 2013
[PU(B) 59/2013]
-Nil-
ACT 755 Finance Act 2013 11 January 2013 -Nil-
ACT 756 Traditional And Complementary Medicine Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-
ACT 757 Strata Management Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-

Amending Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1447 Pensions Adjustment (Amendment) Act 2013 1 January 2013 ACT 238
ACT A1448 Central Bank Of Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 8 February 2013
[PU(B) 44/2013]
ACT 701
ACT A1449 Industrial Designs (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT 552
ACT A1450 Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT 318
ACT A1451 Perbadanan Kemajuan Filem Nasional Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT 244

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 83/2013 Co-Operative Societies (Assumption Of Control) (Replacement) Order 2013 5 March 2013 6 March 2013 ACT 502
PU(A) 84/2013 Co-Operative Societies (Assumption Of Control) (Replacement) (No. 2) Order 2013 5 March 2013 6 March 2013 ACT 502
PU(A) 85/2013 Customs (Values) (Crude Petroleum Oil) (No. 5) Order 2013 7 March 2013 7 March 2013
to
20 March 2013
ACT 235
PU(A) 86/2013 Workmen's Compensation (Foreign Workers' Compensation Scheme) (Insurance) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2013 7 March 2013 8 March 2013 ACT 273
PU(A) 87/2013 Factories And Machinery (Exemption To PETRONAS Chemicals Methanol Sdn Bhd, Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan) Order 2013 8 March 2013 9 March 2013 ACT 139

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 68/2013 Exemption Under Subsection 2A(2) 7 March 2013 7 January 2013 ACT 400
PU(B) 69/2013 Notice Of Amendments To The List Of Licensees 8 March 2013 9 March 2013 ACT 731
PU(B) 70/2013 Notification Of The Date And Duration Of Sales At Cheap Sale Price For The Calendar Year 2013 12 March 2013 13 March 2013 ACT 730
PU(B) 71/2013 Revocation Of Appointment Of Notary Public 12 March 2013 27 February 2013 ACT 115
PU(B) 75/2013 Appointment Of Date Of Coming Into Operation 14 March 2013 15 March 2013 ACT 727
[2013] 1 LNS(A) xiii MALAYSIA

THE LAW OF DEFAMATION AND THE DEFENCE OF QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE

by

SOO SIEW MEI*


IN THIS ARTICLE, SOO SIEW MEI DISCUSSES THE STANDARD OF RESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DEFENCE OF QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE.

A person who makes a statement of fact which is defamatory and untrue may incur liability for defamation. The defence of qualified privilege affords protection to the maker of such a statement that may have been made on protected occasions. To establish the defence of qualified privilege, the defendant must show that there is a legal, social or moral duty to make or publish the defamatory statement and the recipient has a corresponding interest to receive the statement.

Historically, in England, the defence of qualified privilege only applies to publication to persons who had proper interest or duty in the matter with which it was concerned. The public as a whole was not regarded as having a relevant interest or duty. It was therefore difficult for the news media to seek protection of the defence of qualified privilege, even if the statements published appeared to be of legitimate public interest.

. . .

* Published with kind permission of M/s Shearn Delamore & Co. (Disclaimer: This article is presented for information purpose only and covers legal issues in a general way. The contents are not intended to constitute advice on any specific matter and should not be relied upon as a substitute for detailed legal advice. © 2012 Shearn Delamore & Co. All rights reserved.)

Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.

Copyright ® 1997 - 2013 CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone: (603)-4270-5400

[2013] 1 LNS(A) xiv MALAYSIA

IS YOUR BUSINESS COMPETITION LAW COMPLIANT?

by

RACHEL BURGESS*


The Malaysian Competition Commission (MyCC) has made it clear that the beginning of 2013 will see the end of its 'soft touch' approach to enforcement of Malaysia's Competition Act 2010 (CA 2010), which came into force on 1 January 2012. Now is the time to ensure your business is competition compliant.

The best way to ensure compliance is to put in place a "competition law compliance programme". This article sets out the steps involved in establishing a compliance programme and includes some practical tips.

WHERE TO BEGIN?

As a preliminary step, you should ensure that the CA 2010 applies to your business. The CA 2010 applies to "any commercial activity". This is a broad concept so it is likely that the activities of most businesses in Malaysia - big and small - will be caught by the Act.

. . .

* LLB (Hons) (Qld), Director, Amicitia Sdn Bhd.

Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.

Copyright ® 1997 - 2013 CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone: (603)-4270-5400

Content for Link 3
Content for Link 3
x