CLJ Bulletin, Vol 2007, Issue 19
1 June 2007
CLJ Law MALAYSIA
Print this page![]() |
Introduction:
To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription
Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
New This Week - | 1. CLJ May (Part 4) 2007 |
2. CLJ Supp May (Part 2) 2007 |
COURT
FEDERAL COURT
Che Omar Mohd Akhir v. PP
(Murder - Defence of grave and sudden provocation - Applicable test) [2007] 3 CLJ
281
COURT OF APPEAL
Mobikom Sdn Bhd v. Inmiss Communications Sdn Bhd
(Winding up petition - Injunction against - "Fortuna injunction") [2007] 3 CLJ
295
Tan Geok Teck & Yang Lain lwn. Upaya Kelana (M) Sdn Bhd
(Kaveat - Perjanjian usahasama membangunkan tanah - Sama ada membangkitkan kepentingan
berkaveat) [2007] 3 CLJ
312
HIGH COURT
Parallel Media Golf (Asia) Ltd v. Asian PGA Bhd
(Judgment - Leave to enter final judgment - Order 27 r. 3 RHC) [2007] 3 CLJ
331
Re Yogananthy AS Thambaiya; ex p Idris Osman
(Judge - Application to disqualify - Apparent bias) [2007] 3 CLJ
335
Wong Kow lwn. Chay Ten Sang
(Injunksi - Injunksi interim ex parte - Pembubaran) [2007] 3 CLJ
349
SUBJECT INDEX
ARBITRATION
Award - Registration and execution - Award not registered or converted to order of
court - Whether not final and binding - Whether did not entitle successful party to levy
execution on assets of unsuccessful party - Arbitration Act 1952, s. 27 - Companies Act
1965, s. 218
Mobikom Sdn Bhd v. Inmiss Communications Sdn Bhd
(Gopal Sri Ram, Hashim Yusoff & Azmel Maamor JJCA) [2007] 3 CLJ
295 [CA]
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Injunction - "Fortuna injunction" - Execution of arbitrator's award by way of
winding up petition - Injunction to restrain petition - "Fortuna principles" -
Companies Act 1965, s. 218 - Arbitration Act 1952, s. 27
Mobikom Sdn Bhd v. Inmiss Communications Sdn Bhd
(Gopal Sri Ram, Hashim Yusoff & Azmel Maamor JJCA) [2007] 3 CLJ
295 [CA]
Judge - Application to disqualify judge - Allegation of apparent bias - Judge made
adverse findings of facts on plaintiff's conduct in earlier action - Whether findings
supported by evidence - Whether there was no real danger of bias - Whether no basis to
suspect that fair trial would not be possible
Re Yogananthy AS Thambaiya; ex p Idris Osman
(Syed Ahmad Helmy J) [2007] 3 CLJ
335 [HC]
Judgment - Claim for repayment of loan - Leave to enter final judgment - Fact of loan
and of defendant's liability reflected in defendant's accounts - Whether there was
admission of fact as to defendant's indebtedness - Whether plaintiff entitled to final
judgment - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 27 r. 3
Parallel Media Golf (Asia) Ltd v. Asian PGA Bhd
(Abdul Wahab Said Ahmad J) [2007] 3 CLJ
331 [HC]
COMPANY LAW
Winding up - Petition - Arbitrator's award - Execution of award by way of winding up
petition - Award not registered or converted to order of court - Whether only giving rise
to cause of action at common law - Whether presentation of petition premature - Companies
Act 1965, s. 218 - Arbitration Act 1952, s. 27
Mobikom Sdn Bhd v. Inmiss Communications Sdn Bhd
(Gopal Sri Ram, Hashim Yusoff & Azmel Maamor JJCA) [2007] 3 CLJ
295 [CA]
CRIMINAL LAW
Penal Code - Section 302 - Murder - Defence - Grave and sudden provocation - Gradual
and accumulated provocation - Whether could amount to grave and sudden provocation -
Applicable test - Whether that of a reasonable man - Penal Code, ss. 300 (Exception 1),
302
Che Omar Mohd Akhir v. PP
(Nik Hashim, Hashim Yusoff & Azmel Maamor FCJJ) [2007] 3 CLJ
281 [FC]
INDEKS PERKARA
PROSEDUR SIVIL
Injunksi - Injunksi interim ex parte - Pembubaran - Perjanjian pajakan tanah - Sama ada
berlaku pelanggaran terma - Sama ada wujud isu serius yang harus dibicarakan - Sama ada
boleh dipampas dengan secukupnya - Imbangan kemudahan
Wong Kow lwn. Chay Ten Sang
(Abd Halim Aman PK) [2007] 3 CLJ
349 [HC]
UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH
Kaveat - Kaveat persendirian - Kepentingan berkaveat - Perjanjian usahasama untuk
membangun dan memajukan tanah - Sama ada tidak membangkitkan hak berkaveat - Sama ada
kaveat patut dibatalkan - Kanun Tanah Negara, s. 323
Tan Geok Teck & Yang Lain lwn. Upaya Kelana (M) Sdn Bhd
(Mokhtar Sidin, Mohd Ghazali Yusoff & Zulkefli Makinudin HHMR) [2007] 3 CLJ
312 [CA]
COURT
HIGH COURT
Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd v. Hambira (M) Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Civil procedure - Discovery - Inspection of documents - Production of notice of
demand) [2007]
8 CLJ 61
Ismail Shamsudin v. Abdul Aziz Abdan
(Tort - Defamation - Libel and slander - Allegation of - Whether words uttered and
published disparaging to plaintiff) [2007] 8 CLJ
65
Lee Tak Suan & Anor v. Tunku Dato' Seri Shahabudin Tunku Besar Burhanuddin &
Ors
(Unincorporated associations - Societies - Disputes - Derivative action) [2007] 8 CLJ
75
Muthamah Kaliappen v. PP
(Criminal procedure - Bail - Cancellation and withdrawal - Application for) [2007] 8 CLJ
84
Petronas Dagangan Bhd lwn. STLR Sendirian Berhad & Satu Lagi
(Undang-undang tanah - Milikan kosong - Penyerahan - Tuntutan untuk penyerahan) [2007] 8 CLJ
94
Re Siow Ah Moi; ex p United Orient Leasing Company Bhd
(Bankruptcy - Discharge - Application for - Procedural objections raised by
respondent/creditor) [2007] 8 CLJ
104
Syarikat Upayapadu (M) Sdn Bhd lwn. Dato' Hj Mokhtar Mat Isa & Yang Lain
(Prosedur Sivil - Injunksi - Injunksi interlokutori - Permohonan menahan defendan
ketiga daripada meneruskan latihan tender kawasan pembalakan) [2007] 8 CLJ
125
SUBJECT INDEX
BANKRUPTCY
Discharge - Application for - Appeal against decision of registrar's refusal to allow
appellant's application for discharge as bankrupt - Procedural objections raised by
respondent/creditor - Whether dismissed - Whether there was non compliance of r. 194 of
Bankruptcy Rules 1969 - Whether court could exercise discretion to make order of discharge
on facts of case - Whether appeal should be allowed - Bankruptcy Rules 1969, r. 274 -
Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 4
Re Siow Ah Moi; ex p United Orient Leasing Company Bhd
(Hamid Sultan JC) [2007] 8 CLJ
104 [HC]
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Discovery - Inspection of documents - Appeal against - Production of notice of demand -
Whether relevant to plaintiff's claim - Whether pleaded by plaintiff - Whether second
defendant entitled to demand notice for production and inspection - Whether material -
Whether plaintiff could not refuse to produce notice of demand - Rules of the High Court
1980, O. 24 r. 10
Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd v. Hambira (M) Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Abdul Wahab Patail J) [2007] 8 CLJ
61 [HC]
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Bail - Cancellation and withdrawal - Application for - RM25,000 forfeited by Sessions
Court for non-attendance of bailor and accused - Whether should be returned to appellant -
Duties of a bailor - Whether bailor duty bound to ensure accused attend court on fixed
dates - Failure to inform Sessions Court of accused's situation - Whether a serious
dereliction of duty as bailor - Notice of Bailor not served on appellant - Whether due to
bailor's own mistake in giving old address - Whether there was sufficient cause why bail
should not be forfeited - Whether there were extenuating circumstances in favour of
appellant - Whether there were grounds to interfere with Sessions Court's decision to
forfeit
Muthamah Kaliappen v. PP
(Zainal Adzam J) [2007] 8 CLJ
84 [HC]
Bail bond - Forfeiture of - Appeal by bailor against order of Sessions Court judge -
RM25,000 forfeited by Sessions Court for non-attendance of bailor and accused - Whether
should be returned to appellant - Duties of a bailor - Whether bailor duty bound to ensure
accused attend court on fixed dates - Failure to inform Sessions Court of accused's
situation - Whether a serious dereliction of duty as bailor - Notice of Bailor not served
on appellant - Whether due to bailor's own mistake in giving old address - Whether there
was sufficient cause why bail should not be forfeited - Whether there were extenuating
circumstances in favour of appellant - Whether there were grounds to interfere with
Sessions Court's decision to forfeit
Muthamah Kaliappen v. PP
(Zainal Adzam J) [2007] 8 CLJ
84 [HC]
TORT
Damages - Award of damages - Claim for aggravated and exemplary damages - Assessment of
Ismail Shamsudin v. Abdul Aziz Abdan
(Low Hop Bing J) [2007] 8 CLJ
65 [HC]
Defamation - Libel and slander - Allegation of - Whether words uttered and published
disparaging to plaintiff - Whether constituted slander - Defamation Act 1957, s. 5 -
Defence of justification - Whether proved - Whether defendants liable for libel and
slander - Whether plaintiff suffered damages
Ismail Shamsudin v. Abdul Aziz Abdan
(Low Hop Bing J) [2007] 8 CLJ
65 [HC]
UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
Societies - Disputes - Derivative action - Whether plaintiffs have legal right to
commence derivative action against club - Pre-conditions or elements for derivative action
- Whether satisfied - Abdul Rahim Aki v. Krubong Industrial Park - Whether club could be
sued - Societies Act 1966, s. 9(c)
Lee Tak Suan & Anor v. Tunku Dato' Seri Shahabudin Tunku Besar Burhanuddin &
Ors
(Mohd Hishamudin Yunus J) [2007] 8 CLJ
75 [HC]
INDEKS PERKARA
PROSEDUR SIVIL
Injunksi - Injunksi interlokutori - Permohonan menahan defendan ketiga daripada
meneruskan latihan tender kawasan pembalakan - Isu-isu dibangkitkan - Sama ada persoalan
serius - Prinsip kes American Cyanamid - Sama ada dipenuhi oleh plaintif - Harapan sah
(legitimate expectation) - Pertimbangan - Sama ada permohonan dibenarkan
Syarikat Upayapadu (M) Sdn Bhd lwn. Dato' Hj Mokhtar Mat Isa & Yang Lain
(Abd Halim Aman PK) [2007] 8 CLJ
125 [HC]
UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH
Milikan kosong - Penyerahan - Tuntutan untuk penyerahan - Sama ada defendan kedua gagal
menyerahkan milikan kosong - Sama ada keterangan wujud untuk menyokong hujahan defendan
kedua bahawa beliau telah memberi milikan kosong - Kegagalan memanggil saksi tertentu -
Sama ada 'fatal' - Sama ada tuntutan balas defendan dibenarkan
Petronas Dagangan Bhd lwn. STLR Sendirian Berhad & Satu Lagi
(Mohtarudin Baki H) [2007] 8 CLJ
94 [HC]
CASE OF THE WEEK
GAN HWA KIAN & ANOR v. SHENCOURT SDN BHD
CONTRACT: Sale and purchase of property - Delay in completion - Rescission - Time of essence - Whether plaintiffs entitled to rescind contract - Whether plaintiffs entitled to refund of monies paid for purchase - Whether plaintiffs entitlement to liquidated damages took away right to rescind - Whether plaintiffs could recover insurance premium paid - Contracts Act 1950, ss. 56(1), 76
CLJ Bulletin
To Subscribe/Unsubscribe go to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 CLJ Legal Network Sdn
Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone:
603-4270-5400 Fax No : 603-4270 5401 & 603-4270 5402