CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2013, Vol 19 10 May 2013 Print this page |
METROBUS NATIONWIDE SDN BHD v. LEMBAGA PELESENAN KENDERAAN PERDAGANGAN SEMENANJUNG MALAYSIA & ANOR
HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
ALIZATUL KHAIR OSMAN J
[APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW NO: R2-25-224-07]
28 MARCH 2012
Administrative Law: Remedies - Mandamus - Conditions under s. 44(1) Specific Relief Act 1950 - Whether satisfied to qualify for grant of order of mandamus - Whether Licensing Board had statutory duty to enforce common fare rates on all stage buses - Whether Board acted ultra vires in allowing RapidKL to charge lower fare rates than that statutorily prescribed - Whether there were losses suffered as direct result of RapidKL's lower fares - Ingredients to establish case for unfair discrimination - Whether proved
IN RE INQUEST INTO THE DEATH OF TEOH BENG HOCK, DECEASED [2012] 1 SMC 19
MAGISTRATE'S COURT, SHAH ALAM
AZMIL MUNTAPHA ABAS MG
[CORONER'S INQUEST NO: 88-10-2009]
5 JANUARY 2011
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Sudden death - Inquest - Duty of Coroner - Standard of proof - Conflicting medical evidence - Medical evidence pointing to both suicide and homicide - Proper verdict - Whether warranting an open verdict - Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 329, 337, 338
EVIDENCE: Standard of proof - Sudden death - Inquest - Whether on a balance of probabilities - Whether beyond reasonable doubt - Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 329, 337, 338
JUDICIAL QUOTES
ISSUE NO. [3]: PP v. CHAI MEI LIAN [2010] 6 CLJ 24
[3] Issue: Whether upon a proper reading of s. 111 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 and the new s. 118 of the Customs Act 1967, the court of a Magistrate of the First Class in Sarawak, which heard a charge under s. 135 of the Customs Act 1967, had no jurisdiction to hear the case:
"In the light of numerous authorities on the cannon of statutory construction, we are of the view that on the plain and literal reading of s. 118 of the Customs Act 1967, the intention of Parliament is clear and unambiguous in that Magistrate of the First Class in Sarawak shall have the jurisdiction to try any offence under the Customs Act 1967. Such Magistrate shall also have the power to award the full punishment for any such offence. Such being the intention of Parliament, it is the sacred responsibility of the Court to give effect to it. Therefore we conclude that s. 111 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 does not affect the operation of the Customs Act 1967. Hence Magistrates of the First Class in Sarawak can try offences under the said Act. The learned First Class Magistrate who heard the custom offence under appeal was indeed empowered to hear it and to award the full punishment for it." - per Sulong Matjeraie JCA in PP v. Chai Mei Lian [2010] 6 CLJ 24
.
For more Judicial Quotes, please login and view under "References" or subscribe to CLJLaw. |
Legal Network Series
SYARIKAT BINA KUARI KEDAH SDN BHD v. CREST GEOSYSTEM SDN BHD
CONTRACT: Breach - Supply of goods - Whether product delivered was not what was ordered - Words "bituminous coating" did not appear in plaintiff's purchase order or defendant's quotation - Product brochure given to plaintiff - Whether any representation there that product would contain bituminous coating - Words "as per JKR specifications" in plaintiff's purchase order - Whether words actually meant including bituminous coating - Whether defendant knew of specifications - Whether defendant supplied a product ordered by plaintiff - Whether there was specification of bituminous coating
MOHD MOPTI YASSIN v. LEMBAGA KEMAJUAN PERUSAHAAN PETANIAN NEGERI PAHANG (LKPP) CORPORATION SDN BHD & ANOR
TORT: Detinue - Whether cows brought to Ladang Sri Merbau and reared there until floods caused them to flee - Whether plaintiff's cows ever allowed entry into the 2nd defendant's Ladang - If so, whether 2nd defendant liable for loss of cows - Whether 2nd defendant had taken responsibility for the safety of the cows - Whether the 200 cows rounded up in the 2nd defendant's Ladang belonged to plaintiff - Whether any of plaintiff's cows were wrongfully confined or sold by 2nd or 3rd defendants
TORT: Detinue - Cause of action - Whether plaintiff had arrangement with SP3 to keep cows at Ladang Sri Merbau, one of the many Ladangs belonging to 2nd defendant - Plaintiff claiming cows fled during flood and took cover in other Ladangs - Whether there was wrongful detention by Ladang Sri Merbau - Whether plaintiff had arrangements with other Ladangs concerning the safety of his cows - Whether issue of wrongful detention applicable - Whether plaintiff proved cause of action against defendants
KATTAYAT MOHANDAS CP NARAYANA MENON v. MANGALAM SINNIAH; HARVEEN KAUR BALBIR SINGH (CO-RESPONDENT/PARTY CITED)
FAMILY LAW: Divorce - Decree Nisi granted - Consent judgment made - Subsequent application filed to set aside and/or to vary Decree Nisi - Whether respondent wife had to elect whether to apply to set aside, or to vary Decree Nisi - Whether Consent Judgment a final order and could not be set aside in the same action - Whether court functus officio
FAMILY LAW: Divorce - Decree Nisi granted - Variation of - Whether Decree Nisi could be varied - Whether respondent wife under any misrepresentation or mistake of facts regarding Consent Order - Whether there was a material change in circumstances to justify a variation for maintenance - Respondent wife waived her right to maintenance so none ordered - Whether nothing for the Court to vary - Whether any justification for respondent wife to apply for variation of the division of matrimonial assets after divorce granted by the Court - Whether respondent wife's application was vexatious and scandalous and an abuse of the Court process
FAMILY LAW: Divorce - Decree Nisi granted - Consent judgment made - Whether respondent wife showed there was injustice or abuse of process, or fraud, misrepresentation, coercion or undue influence when Consent Order was entered into that vitiated her free consent - Whether terms of Decree Nisi settled all issues amongst the parties - Acceptance of benefits under several clauses of Consent Decree Nisi - Whether respondent wife bound by all the terms therein and should not be permitted to renege on Consent Order
LAU YUK HUA v. THE COMMISSION OF STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF SARAWAK
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Rights and liabilities of public servants - Dismissal - Mala fide - Unexplained delay of eleven years from the time of interdiction until eventual dismissal after court discharged applicant not amounting to acquittal - Whether there was mala fide on the part of respondent - Whether delay should be construed against respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Natural justice - Breach - Whether non-compliance with Rule 32(1) of the Public Service Commission Rules - Whether applicant was given opportunity to be heard prior to dismissal
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Natural justice - Breach - Whether non-compliance with Rule 35(1) and (2)(b) of Public Service Commission Rules - Whether mandatory for respondent in exercising disciplinary control over public officers to grant applicant a hearing before a Disciplinary Board - Whether respondent had the discretion to dispense with granting of hearing to applicant before a Disciplinary Board - Whether there was breach of natural justice
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Natural justice - Breach - Failure to give reasons for dismissal of applicant - Whether Public Service Commission Rules provided that the Commission had to provide grounds of dismissal - Whether rules of natural justice breached
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Rights and liabilities of public servants - Dismissal - Applicant opted to retire on 1 March 2008 - Whether 2nd charge laid after applicant's retirement was ultra vires, null and void and of no effect - Whether 2nd charge laid against applicant before his actual retirement - Whether applicant's service deemed extended - Whether applicant's dismissal ultra vires, null and void
NG LEE KIAU & ANOR v. MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD
BANKING: Banker and customer - Authorisation - Mandate - Mandate given to 1st plaintiff by Mr. E. Ramasamy since 20 November 1995 - Status of 2nd plaintiff changed from a sole proprietorship to a partnership - Mr. E. Ramasamy later became incapacitated - Whether mandate revoked - Whether mandate remained effective vis-a-vis defendant
CONTRACT: Breach - Breach of duty - Cheques dishonoured when defendant froze 2nd plaintiff's clients' accounts - Monthly account statements of 2nd plaintiff's clients' accounts sent to K.K. Lim and Associates - Whether defendant breached its contractual obligations to plaintiffs - Whether defendant breached its fiduciary duty towards plaintiffs - Whether plaintiffs entitled to damages
TORT: Defamation - Dishonour of cheques - 2nd plaintiff's clients' accounts frozen by defendant - Whether defendant wrong in law and had defamed plaintiffs - 3 cheques issued by 1st plaintiff rejected with remarks "Drawer Confirmation Required/Pending" - Whether defendant's actions defamed and dishonoured plaintiffs, their professional integrity, credibility and reputation - Whether defendant's actions constituted publication to staff of HSBC Bank Malaysia Bhd. of the plaintiffs' affairs and credibility - Whether defendant breached its duty of care to plaintiffs - Whether plaintiffs entitled to damages
CLJ 2013 Volume 3 (Part 4)
COURT
COURT OF APPEAL
Malayan Banking Bhd v. Sparrows & Arrows Sdn Bhd & Anor
Hishamudin Mohd Yunus, Alizatul Khair Osman, Lim Yee Lan JJCA
(Banking - Loan agreement - Default in repayment) [2013] 3 CLJ 481 [CA]HIGH COURT
Awtar Singh Puran Singh v. Majlis Peguam Malaysia
Teo Say Eng JC
(Legal Profession - Reinstatement - Restoration to the roll - Character of applicant) [2013] 3 CLJ 494 [HC]Persatuan Peniaga & Kebajikan Pasar Minggu Kg Baru, Kuala Lumpur & Yang Lain lwn. Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur
Siti Khadijah Hassan Badjenid PK
(Undang-Undang Tanah - Pengambilan tanah - Pihak berkuasa - Locus standi - Pampasan) [2013] 3 CLJ 503 [HC]PP lwn. Khoo Yuen Lee
Samsudin Hassan PK
(Undang-Undang Jenayah - Pengedaran - Jagaan dan kawalan - Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952, ss. 12(2) & 39B(1)(a)) [2013] 3 CLJ 510 [HC]Sarban Singh v. Gindo Ajaib Singh & Ors
Stephen Chung J
(Civil Procedure; Limitation - Action - Striking out - Whether claim time barred - Public Authorities Protection Act 1948, s. 2) [2013] 3 CLJ 534 [HC]The Ayer Molek Rubber Company Bhd v. Bintang-Bintang Sdn Bhd & Ors
Vernon Ong J
(Land Law; Company Law - Sale of land - Indefeasibility of title - Companies Act 1965, s. 223) [2013] 3 CLJ 543 [HC]Wee Kok Bin v. Aseambankers Malaysia Bhd
Mohamad Ariff Yusof J
(Civil Procedure - Pleadings - General allegation of fraud) [2013] 3 CLJ 595 [HC]Wong Kee Chong (An Infirm Suing Through His Wife And Next Friend, Chau Nyok Yen) v. Wong Kow & Ors
Nik Hasmat Nik Mohamad JC
(Contract; Civil Procedure; Evidence - Void contract - Mental incompetency) [2013] 3 CLJ 622 [HC]SUBJECT INDEX
BANKING
Banks and banking business - Loan agreement - Default in repayment - Proposal for settlement agreement - Whether proposal accepted - Whether existence of contract between bank and borrower proven - Doctrine of estoppel - Whether applicable
Malayan Banking Bhd v. Sparrows & Arrows Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Hishamudin Mohd Yunus, Alizatul Khair Osman, Lim Yee Lan JJCA) [2013] 3 CLJ 481 [CA]CIVIL PROCEDURE
Action - Striking out - Whether claim time barred - Whether suit filed outside limitation period of two years - Limitation Ordinance of Sarawak, item 19 - Whether action maintainable under s. 2 Public Authorities Protection Act 1948
Sarban Singh v. Gindo Ajaib Singh & Ors
(Stephen Chung J) [2013] 3 CLJ 534 [HC]Parties - Action instituted by plaintiff's wife as plaintiff's next friend - Whether plaintiff's wife was proper party to institute present action on behalf of plaintiff - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 76 r. 3(2)
Wong Kee Chong (An Infirm Suing Through His Wife And Next Friend, Chau Nyok Yen) v. Wong Kow & Ors
(Nik Hasmat Nik Mohamad JC) [2013] 3 CLJ 622 [HC]Pleadings - Fraud - General allegation of fraud - Whether insufficient - Whether fraud specifically pleaded with particulars - Whether plaintiff failed to prove defendant conspired to depress share price or breached any securities laws - Whether plaintiff's suspension and subsequent termination as remisier properly effected - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 18 r. 8(1) & (2)
Wee Kok Bin v. Aseambankers Malaysia Bhd
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof J) [2013] 3 CLJ 595 [HC]Pleadings - Writ and statement of claim - Striking out - Application for - Whether claim time barred - Whether suit filed outside limitation period of two years - Limitation Ordinance of Sarawak, item 19 - Whether action maintainable under s. 2 Public Authorities Protection Act 1948
Sarban Singh v. Gindo Ajaib Singh & Ors
(Stephen Chung J) [2013] 3 CLJ 534 [HC]COMPANY LAW
Winding up - Stay order, permanent - Effect of - Transfer of land effected after presentation of winding up petition - Whether impugned events that took place after presentation of winding up petition illegal, null and void - Companies Act 1965, s. 223
The Ayer Molek Rubber Company Bhd v. Bintang-Bintang Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Vernon Ong J) [2013] 3 CLJ 543 [HC]CONTRACT
Void contract - Capacity - Execution of memorandum of transfer of share in two properties - Plaintiff suffering from chronic mental illness preceding execution of transfer - Agreement executed by person of unsound mind - Whether void - Whether plaintiff lacked mental capacity to understand consequences of execution of transfer forms - Fraud - Whether defendants committed fraud against plaintiff in execution of plaintiff's transfer - Undue influence - Whether first defendant in advantageous position to influence and dominate plaintiff
Wong Kee Chong (An Infirm Suing Through His Wife And Next Friend, Chau Nyok Yen) v. Wong Kow & Ors
(Nik Hasmat Nik Mohamad JC) [2013] 3 CLJ 622 [HC]EVIDENCE
Expert evidence - Mental incompetency - Plaintiff's mental incompetency to execute transfer of properties was primarily premised on testimony of medical expert - Whether plaintiff's expert evidence confirmed plaintiff's mental incompetency - Whether defendants' expert evidence casted doubt on plaintiff's case
Wong Kee Chong (An Infirm Suing Through His Wife And Next Friend, Chau Nyok Yen) v. Wong Kow & Ors
(Nik Hasmat Nik Mohamad JC) [2013] 3 CLJ 622 [HC]LAND LAW
Sale of land - Indefeasibility of title - Sale of land by plaintiff after presentation of winding up petition - Whether sale effected by fraud, dishonesty and conspiracy - Whether existence of conspiracy proven - Whether fraud proven beyond reasonable doubt - Whether sale price of land undervalued - Whether first defendant acted in good faith for valuable consideration - Whether shareholders' resolution required for sale of land - Royal British Bank v. Turquand
The Ayer Molek Rubber Company Bhd v. Bintang-Bintang Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Vernon Ong J) [2013] 3 CLJ 543 [HC]LEGAL PROFESSION
Professional discipline - Reinstatement - Restoration to the roll - Whether applicant fit and proper person to be reinstated - Whether being struck off from rolls for more than five years created an automatic right for reinstatement - Character of applicant - Whether character reference sufficient to show change of character - Whether restitution enough to support reinstatement
Awtar Singh Puran Singh v. Majlis Peguam Malaysia
(Teo Say Eng JC) [2013] 3 CLJ 494 [HC]Roll of advocates and solicitors - Restoration - Application for - Whether applicant fit and proper person to be reinstated - Whether being struck off from rolls for more than five years created an automatic right for reinstatement - Character of applicant - Whether character reference sufficient to show change of character - Whether restitution enough to support reinstatement
Awtar Singh Puran Singh v. Majlis Peguam Malaysia
(Teo Say Eng JC) [2013] 3 CLJ 494 [HC]LIMITATION
Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 - Section 2 - Whether claim time barred - Whether suit filed outside limitation period of two years - Limitation Ordinance of Sarawak, item 19 - Whether action maintainable
Sarban Singh v. Gindo Ajaib Singh & Ors
(Stephen Chung J) [2013] 3 CLJ 534 [HC]INDEKS PERKARA
UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH
Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - Seksyen 39B(1)(a) - Pengedaran - Sama ada peruntukan anggapan di bawah s. 37(da) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 boleh digunapakai untuk membuktikan elemen pengedaran dadah jenis Ketamine - Sama ada "concealing" dadah dapat menimbulkan kesalahan pengedaran - Sama ada dadah telah dipindahkan daripada satu tempat ke satu tempat yang lain bagi tujuan "promote distribution" kepada pihak ketiga - Sama ada tertuduh mempunyai jagaan dan kawalan - Kes prima facie - Sama ada terbukti - Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952, ss. 12(2) & 39B(1)(a)
PP lwn. Khoo Yuen Lee
(Samsudin Hassan PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 510 [HC]UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH
Pengambilan tanah - Pengambilan tanah oleh pihak berkuasa - Plaintif-plaintif terdiri daripada persatuan dan peniaga-peniaga - Pihak berkuasa memberikan notis agar penduduk tanah berpindah - Sama ada pihak berkuasa pemilik berdaftar tanah - Sama ada penduduk-penduduk merupakan penghuni setinggan - Sama ada plaintif-plaintif mempunyai locus standi untuk memfailkan tuntutan - Sama ada pemilikan bertentangan membentuk hak kepada penduduk-penduduk
Persatuan Peniaga & Kebajikan Pasar Minggu Kg Baru, Kuala Lumpur & Yang Lain lwn. Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur
(Siti Khadijah Hassan Badjenid PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 503 [HC]
Legal Network Series Article
1. SHAREHOLDERS' MEETINGS IN CYBERSPACE* [Read excerpt]
by: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DR AISHAH BIDIN** [2013] 1 LNS(A) xxvii2. RIGHT TO LIFE AS A HUMAN RIGHT AND PUNISHMENT FOR HOMICIDE IN ISLAM [Read excerpt]
by: M. ERSHADUL BARI* [2013] 1 LNS(A) xxviii
Principal Acts
Number | Title | Date coming into force | Repealing |
ACT 755 | Finance Act 2013 | 11 January 2013 | -Nil- |
ACT 756 | Traditional And Complementary Medicine Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
ACT 757 | Strata Management Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
ACT 758 | Financial Services Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
ACT 759 | Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
Amending Acts
Number | Title | Date coming into force | Principal/Amending Act No |
ACT A1448 | Central Bank Of Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 | 8 February 2013 [PU(B) 44/2013] | ACT 701 |
ACT A1449 | Industrial Designs (Amendment) Act 2013 | 1 July 2013 [PU(B) 86/2013] | ACT 552 |
ACT A1450 | Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | ACT 318 |
ACT A1451 | Perbadanan Kemajuan Filem Nasional Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 | 1 April 2013 [PU(B) 89/2013] | ACT 244 |
ACT A1452 | Animals (Amendment) Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | ACT 647 |
PU(A)
Number | Title | Date of Publication | Date coming into force | Principal/Amending Act No |
PU(A) 148/2013 | Customs (Values) (Palm Kernel) (No. 5) Order 2013 | 30 April 2013 | 1 May 2013 to 31 May 2013 | ACT 235 |
PU(A) 149/2013 | Medical (Amendment Of Second Schedule) (No. 2) Order 2013 | 30 April 2013 | 1 May 2013 | ACT 50 |
PU(A) 150/2013 | Customs (Values) (Crude Petroleum Oil) (No. 9) Order 2013 | 2 May 2013 | 2 May 2013 to 15 May 2013 | ACT 235 |
PU(A) 151/2013 | Electricity (Amendment) Regulations 2013 | 3 May 2013 | 3 May 2013 | ACT 447 |
PU(A) 152/2013 | Ministers Of The Federal Government Order 2013 | 7 May 2013 | 6 May 2013 | ACT 2 |
PU(B)
Number | Title | Date of Publication | Date coming into force | Principal/Amending Act No |
PU(B) 161/2013 | Polling Districts, Polling Centres And Polling Hours (Amendment) (No. 8) | 25 April 2013 | 26 April 2013 | ACT 19 |
PU(B) 162/2013 | Polling Districts, Polling Centres And Polling Hours (Amendment) (No. 9) | 25 April 2013 | 26 April 2013 | ACT 19 |
PU(B) 163/2013 | Polling Districts, Polling Centres And Polling Hours (Amendment) (No. 10) | 25 April 2013 | 26 April 2013 | ACT 19 |
PU(B) 164/2013 | Polling Districts, Polling Centres And Polling Hours (Amendment) (No. 11) | 26 April 2013 | 27 April 2013 | ACT 19 |
PU(B) 165/2013 | Polling Districts, Polling Centres And Polling Hours (Amendment) (No. 12) | 26 April 2013 | 27 April 2013 | ACT 19 |
To view previous issues of the CLJ Bulletin, Click here
If you no longer wish to receive this email in the future, you may unsubscribe.
CLJ Bulletin: Copyright © 1997 - 2013 CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone: 03-42705421(DL) 03-42705400(GL) Fax No: 03-42705402