 |
CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2013, Vol 21 24 May 2013 Print this page 
|
To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription
Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
New This Week
1. Cases Of The Week
a) WONG WEE KHEONG & ANOR v. DAYA BERSAMA SDN BHD & OTHER APPEALS
b) TENAGA NASIONAL BHD lwn. GEMENCHEH ENTERPRISE SDN BHD [2013] 2 SMC 148
2. Latest Cases
3. Articles
4. Legislation Highlights
c) PU(A)
d) PU(B)
WONG WEE KHEONG & ANOR v. DAYA BERSAMA SDN BHD & OTHER APPEALS
FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA
ZULKEFLI MAKINUDIN CJ (MALAYA); ABDULL HAMID EMBONG FCJ; SURIYADI HALIM OMAR FCJ;
AHMAD MAAROP FCJ; ZALEHA ZAHARI FCJ
[CIVIL APPEALS NO: 02(F)-64-10-2011(W), 02(F)-65-10-2011(W), 02(F)-66-10-2011(W) & 02(F)-67-10-2011(W)]
13 MARCH 2013
COMPANY LAW: Winding up - Disposition of property - Sale and purchase agreement - Failure to obtain consent of liquidator or order of court - Whether transaction valid - Purchasers acquired property in good faith for value without notice - Proof of - Allegation of fraud - Whether actual fraud proven - Whether records showed company wound up at time transaction took place - Whether purchasers' title indefeasible - Whether company relinquished its registered interest when sale of property concluded - Whether court has discretion to validate transfer - Companies Act 1965, s. 233 - National Land Code, s. 340(1)
TENAGA NASIONAL BHD lwn. GEMENCHEH ENTERPRISE SDN BHD [2013] 2 SMC 148 
MAHKAMAH SESYEN, JOHOR BAHRU
MOHD GHAZALI MOHAMAD TAIB HS
[SAMAN NO: 52-2136-2011]
6 JULAI 2012
UTILITI AWAM: Elektrik - Usikan meter - Pengiraan penggunaan caj elektrik - Sama ada defendan telah mengubahsuai meter sehingga penggunaan bekalan elektrik tidak dapat direkodkan - Sama ada plaintif gagal membuktikan perbezaan jumlah penggunaan elektrik - Sama ada fakta berkenaan ralat diplidkan - Sama ada penyata bil asal dikemukakan semasa perbicaraan - Sama ada pengiraan penggunaan caj elektrik terkurang dibuktikan - Akta Bekalan Elektrik 1990, s. 38(4)
JUDICIAL QUOTES
PP v. MARWAN ISMAIL [2008] 3 CLJ 164
[1] Issue: On the true purport of s. 41A Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ('DDA') - and what a Magistrate needs to do in a case where an accused person who is tentatively charged for drug trafficking under s. 39B(1) DDA is brought up before him for a mention:
"Section 41A DDA is a special provision under a special law which operates independently of any other provisions. It provides for a convenient procedure whereby one who is charged with a capital offence under the DDA which is triable only by the High Court may be produced before "the appropriate court" (note that it need not be a Magistrate's Court) in order to obtain an order for transmission. Once produced, that court is under a mandatory obligation to order a transmission of the case."
"If an accused person charged for an offence under s. 39B(1) DDA is produced before a Magistrate, the Magistrate must do the following:
(i) Have the charge read to him.
(ii) Explain to him the charge.
(iii) Not to record any plea by the accused, even if he chose to make one.
(iv) Transmit the case to the High Court.
(v) Cause the accused person to be brought before the High Court as soon as is practicable."
"It may be noted that the reference to the preliminary inquiry in the section is now superfluous since Chapter XVII of the Criminal Procedure Code has been repealed." - per Abdull Hamid Embong JCA in PP v. Marwan Ismail [2008] 3 CLJ 164.
For more Judicial Quotes, please login and view under "References" or subscribe to CLJLaw. |
Legal Network Series
KRISHNAN THANIMALAY v. VIMIX CONCRETE SDN BHD
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out - Action - Appeal against striking out of plaintiff's action - Issues raised concerning status of appellant - Whether an independent contractor or an employee - Appellant denied he claimed compensation from SOCSO, was an "insured person" under the Employee's Social Security Act 1969 and that his claim was barred by s. 31 - Whether there were issues which ought to be resolved in a trial - Whether appellant's claim was an abuse of process - Whether a plain and obvious case for striking out
WONG HONG MENG & ORS v. PRINCE GUNERATNAM & ORS
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Interlocutory injunction - Application for - To prohibit 1st and 2nd defendants from convening 2010 AGM and from excluding plaintiffs from exercising their rights and privileges of membership - Whether an injunction could be enforced against 2nd defendant and by extension, the 1st defendant, as its Chairman - Whether there were serious issues to be tried - Whether defendants shown to have intention to dispose of Church's assets or to amend Church Constitution - Whether unjust to deprive other Church members from exercising their rights as members to attend and to vote at AGM - Whether balance of convenience in plaintiffs' favour
PETROFIBRE NETWORK (M) SDN BHD v. MOHD ZULNAIDI MOHD RAZALI & ORS
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review - Certiorari - Application for - To quash award of Industrial Court - Remedy of reinstatement abandoned by respondents - Industrial Court's jurisdiction to hear respondents' claim - Whether Industrial Court committed an error of law in failing to consider issue of jurisdiction
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review - Certiorari - Application for - To quash award of Industrial Court - Evidence of COW-1 and COW-2 regarding CCTV recording rejected - Whether Industrial Court erred when it found that no explanation was given by applicant contrary to the evidence - Whether Industrial Court committed errors of law in failing to consider relevant matters - Whether award should be quashed
DAIRY FARM GIANT PROPERTIES SDN BHD v. YY NET LINK SDN BHD & ORS
TORT: Defamation - Libel - Words contained in three letters - Whether defendants published words complained of to a third party - Whether words complained of were published of the plaintiff - Whether words complained of in their natural and ordinary meaning were defamatory of plaintiff - Whether imputed to the plaintiff any dishonourable or discreditable conduct or motives or a lack of integrity on its part
TORT: Defamation - Libel - Defence - Justification - No fact pleaded and lacking in particulars - Whether defence of justification sustainable - Whether tantamounted to a bare denial and meaningless
AMALUDIN ISMAIL v. NOKIA (M) SDN BHD
COMPANY LAW: Winding up - Petition - Application to strike out winding-up petition - Whether petitioner had locus to present petition - Whether there was a debt owing to the petitioner by respondent - If so, whether there was an inability to pay such debt - Whether there was mismanagement or oppression by respondent - Whether cause of action was sustainable based upon the averments found in petition - Whether there was a reasonable cause of action
CLJ 2013 Volume 3 (Part 6)
COURT
COURT OF APPEAL
Kyros International Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
Linton Albert, Mohtarudin Baki JJCA, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer J
(Civil Procedure; Revenue Law - Appeal - Income tax - Special Commissioners - Decision of) [2013] 3 CLJ 813 [CA]Pengarah Hospital Selayang & Ors v. Ahmad Azizi Abdullah James & Ors
Abdul Malik Ishak, Mohamed Apandi Ali, Balia Yusof Wahi JJCA
(Civil Procedure; Tort - Parties - Government should not be primary defendant - Medical negligence - Duty of care) [2013] 3 CLJ 833 [CA]HIGH COURT
Chin Nyuk Min v. Mystique Bay Sdn Bhd
David Wong Dak Wah J
(Bankruptcy; Civil Procedure; Equity - Capacity of bankrupt - Charging of interest during period of bankruptcy) [2013] 3 CLJ 843 [HC]Laser Plus Sdn Bhd lwn. Bukit Tinggi Realty Sdn Bhd & Satu Lagi
Yaacob Md Sam H
(Kontrak; Tort - Penamatan kontrak - Permohonan pemulangan dokumen - Pencerobohan) [2013] 3 CLJ 863 [HC]Malayan Banking Bhd lwn. Lek Meng Pallet Industries Sdn Bhd & Yang Lain
Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid H
(Keterangan; Kontrak; Perbankan - Kemungkiran - Perjanjian pinjaman bank) [2013] 3 CLJ 886 [HC]P Mahandran Perumal lwn. P Puvanasvaran A Perumal & Yang Lain
Abdul Karim Jalil PK
(Prosedur Sivil - Pembatalan - Penghakiman dan perintah - Res judicata) [2013] 3 CLJ 906 [HC]PP lwn. Lai Weng Keat
Ahmad Nasfy Yasin PK
(Keterangan; Prosedur Jenayah; Undang-Undang Jenayah - Anggapan - Perbicaraan - Kes separuh didengar) [2013] 3 CLJ 923 [HC]SS Legend Nautilus (M) Sdn Bhd v. Hamzah Mohd Ghauth & Ors
Suraya Othman J
(Customs And Excise; Evidence - Seizure of goods - Whether smuggled) [2013] 3 CLJ 947 [HC]SUBJECT INDEX
BANKRUPTCY
Capacity of bankrupt - Sale of property by undischarged bankrupt - Whether interest could be charged on bankrupt's housing loan during bankruptcy period - Whether bankrupt estopped from disputing redemption amount - Whether estoppel could prevail against statute - Whether bankrupt entitled to refund of alleged overpayment of redemption sum - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 8(2A)
Chin Nyuk Min v. Mystique Bay Sdn Bhd
(David Wong Dak Wah J) [2013] 3 CLJ 843 [HC]CIVIL PROCEDURE
Appeal - Case stated, by way of - Appeal against decision of Special Commissioners of Income Tax (`Special Commissioners') - Appeal to High Court - Whether High Court interfered with Special Commissioners' finding of facts - Whether Special Commissioners' decision was based on misconception of law - Whether appellate court recognises special position of Special Commissioners - Whether Special Commissioners specialised in adjudication process - Whether finding of facts by Special Commissioners warranted appellate interference - Chua Lip Kong v. Director-General of Inland Revenue
Kyros International Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
(Linton Albert, Mohtarudin Baki JJCA, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer J) [2013] 3 CLJ 813 [CA]Declaration - Application for - Sale of property by undischarged bankrupt - Recovery of redemption amount - Whether redemption sum paid invalid - Whether redemption amount levied without basis - Whether bankrupt estopped from disputing redemption amount - Whether estoppel could prevail against statute - Whether bankrupt entitled to refund of alleged overpayment of redemption sum - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 8(2A)
Chin Nyuk Min v. Mystique Bay Sdn Bhd
(David Wong Dak Wah J) [2013] 3 CLJ 843 [HC]Parties - Government, action against - Government should not be primary defendant - Whether tortfeasors correctly named - Whether vicarious liability established - Government Proceedings Act 1956, ss. 5 & 6
Pengarah Hospital Selayang & Ors v. Ahmad Azizi Abdullah James & Ors
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Mohamed Apandi Ali, Balia Yusof Wahi JJCA) [2013] 3 CLJ 833 [CA]Striking out - Writ and statement of claim - Application for - Whether delay of more than two years excessive - Whether limitation set in - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 18 r. 19
Pengarah Hospital Selayang & Ors v. Ahmad Azizi Abdullah James & Ors
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Mohamed Apandi Ali, Balia Yusof Wahi JJCA) [2013] 3 CLJ 833 [CA]CUSTOMS AND EXCISE
Seizure - Seizure of goods - Beers - Seizure based on suspected liquor smuggling activities - Whether there was reasonable suspicion that goods smuggled - Whether seizure lawful and legal - Whether further detention of consignment was in accordance to s. 128(3) of Customs Act 1967 - Whether legal ownership or possessory title to consignment proven
SS Legend Nautilus (M) Sdn Bhd v. Hamzah Mohd Ghauth & Ors
(Suraya Othman J) [2013] 3 CLJ 947 [HC]EQUITY
Estoppel - Equitable estoppel - Sale of property by undischarged bankrupt - Charging of interest during period of bankruptcy - Whether bankrupt estopped from disputing redemption amount - Whether estoppel could prevail against statute - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 8(2A)
Chin Nyuk Min v. Mystique Bay Sdn Bhd(David Wong Dak Wah J) [2013] 3 CLJ 843 [HC]EVIDENCE
Adverse inference - Failure to call material witness - Whether adverse inference invoked - Evidence Act 1950, s. 114(g)
SS Legend Nautilus (M) Sdn Bhd v. Hamzah Mohd Ghauth & Ors
(Suraya Othman J) [2013] 3 CLJ 947 [HC]REVENUE LAW
Income tax - Special Commissioners - Decision of - Appeal to High Court - Whether High Court interfered with Special Commissioners' finding of facts - Whether Special Commissioners' decision was based on misconception of law - Whether appellate court recognises special position of Special Commissioners - Whether Special Commissioners specialised in adjudication process - Whether finding of facts by Special Commissioners warranted appellate interference - Chua Lip Kong v. Director-General of Inland Revenue - Income Tax Act 1967, s. 98
Kyros International Sdn Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
(Linton Albert, Mohtarudin Baki JJCA, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer J) [2013] 3 CLJ 813 [CA]TORT
Negligence - Medical negligence - Duty of care - Whether negligence confined to wrongful treatment - Whether negligent system of medical care and attention - Whether director of hospital owed duty of care on behalf of hospital - Whether breach of duty by surgeon, doctor or nurse working in hospital vicariously imputed to director of hospital - Whether director of hospital correct party to be cited
Pengarah Hospital Selayang & Ors v. Ahmad Azizi Abdullah James & Ors
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Mohamed Apandi Ali, Balia Yusof Wahi JJCA) [2013] 3 CLJ 833 [CA]INDEKS PERKARA
KETERANGAN
Anggapan - Akta Keterangan 1950, s. 114(a) - Pertuduhan membunuh - Sama ada inferens berbangkit bahawa semasa melakukan rompakan tertuduh melakukan pembunuhan - Sama ada rompakan dan pembunuhan berlaku dalam satu transaksi sama
PP lwn. Lai Weng Keat
(Ahmad Nasfy Yasin PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 923 [HC]Inferens bertentangan - Kegagalan memanggil saksi - Kemungkiran pinjaman bank - Bank gagal memanggil dua orang bekas pengurus - Sama ada saksi penting kepada kes - Sama ada anggapan bertentangan berbangkit
Malayan Banking Bhd lwn. Lek Meng Pallet Industries Sdn Bhd & Yang Lain
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid H) [2013] 3 CLJ 886 [HC]Kerelevanan - Fakta untuk menyokong fakta relevan - Tuduhan membunuh - Sama ada motif rompakan tertuduh relevan - Sama ada fakta bahawa tertuduh bergelut semasa ditangkap relevan - Sama ada fakta bahawa tertuduh enggan memberikan spesimen tandatangan relevan - Akta Keterangan 1950, s. 9
PP lwn. Lai Weng Keat
(Ahmad Nasfy Yasin PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 923 [HC]KONTRAK
Kemungkiran - Perjanjian pinjaman bank - Penamatan kemudahan pinjaman - Kemungkiran pembayaran balik - Sama ada bank berhak menarik balik pinjaman - Sama ada bank berhak melikuidasikan simpanan-simpanan tetap yang dicagar - Sama ada jumlah simpanan tetap yang dilikuidasi dipertikaikan - Sama ada peminjam membuktikan "manifest error" atau fraud pada Certificate of Amount Owing - Sama ada peminjam boleh menuntut balas terhadap bank bagi kemungkiran kontrak dan fitnah kerana peminjam disenaraihitamkan
Malayan Banking Bhd lwn. Lek Meng Pallet Industries Sdn Bhd & Yang Lain
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid H) [2013] 3 CLJ 886 [HC]Penamatan kontrak - Permohonan pemulangan dokumen-dokumen berkaitan projek - Sama ada dokumen-dokumen dibuktikan berada dalam milikan defendan-defendan - Sama ada penamatan perjanjian adalah sah - Sama ada defendan-defendan mempunyai justifikasi atau lien untuk terus menyimpan dokumen-dokumen
Laser Plus Sdn Bhd lwn. Bukit Tinggi Realty Sdn Bhd & Satu Lagi
(Yaacob Md Sam H) [2013] 3 CLJ 863 [HC]PERBANKAN
Bank dan perniagaan perbankan - Perjanjian pinjaman - Kemungkiran pembayaran balik - Sama ada bank berhak menarik balik pinjaman - Sama ada bank berhak melikuidasikan simpanan-simpanan tetap yang dicagar - Sama ada jumlah simpanan tetap yang dilikuidasi dipertikaikan - Sama ada peminjam membuktikan "manifest error" atau fraud pada "Certificate of Amount Owing" - Sama ada peminjam boleh menuntut balas terhadap bank bagi kemungkiran kontrak dan fitnah kerana peminjam disenaraihitamkan
Malayan Banking Bhd lwn. Lek Meng Pallet Industries Sdn Bhd & Yang Lain
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid H) [2013] 3 CLJ 886 [HC]TORT
Pencerobohan - Penyimpanan dokumen secara salah - Kegagalan memulangkan dokumen berkaitan projek selepas penamatan perjanjian - Sama ada dokumen-dokumen dibuktikan berada dalam milikan defendan-defendan - Sama ada defendan-defendan mempunyai justifikasi atau lien untuk terus menyimpan dokumen-dokumen
Laser Plus Sdn Bhd lwn. Bukit Tinggi Realty Sdn Bhd & Satu Lagi
(Yaacob Md Sam H) [2013] 3 CLJ 863 [HC]PROSEDUR JENAYAH
Perbicaraan - Kes separuh didengar - Hakim meletak jawatan - Tuduhan membunuh - 17 orang saksi pendakwaan telah memberi keterangan - Sama ada hakim baru betul dalam meneruskan perbicaraan tanpa mendengar de novo - Pembelaan menolak tawaran mahkamah untuk memanggil semula saksi - Hakim terdahulu tidak membuat penemuan mengenai "demeanour" - Kanun Tatacara Jenayah, s. 261
PP lwn. Lai Weng Keat
(Ahmad Nasfy Yasin PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 923 [HC]PROSEDUR SIVIL
Pembatalan - Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi 1980, A. 18 k. 19(1) - Gagal menyatakan perkataan "atau" antara cabang-cabang (a), (b), (c) dan (d) Aturan - Sama ada permohonan boleh dibuat secara kumulatif - Sama ada keterangan afidavit boleh digunakan di bawah A. 18 k. 19(1)(a)
P Mahandran Perumal lwn. P Puvanasvaran A Perumal & Yang Lain
(Abdul Karim Jalil PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 906 [HC]Perintah dan penghakiman - Penghakiman persetujuan - Pengenepian - Sama ada wujud fraud atau ketaksahan - Sama ada penghakiman sah sehingga diketepikan
P Mahandran Perumal lwn. P Puvanasvaran A Perumal & Yang Lain
(Abdul Karim Jalil PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 906 [HC]Perintah dan penghakiman - Penghakiman persetujuan - Res judicata - Pihak-pihak mencapai kompromi dan memasuki penghakiman persetujuan - Plaintif memfailkan semula tindakan yang serupa - Efek penghakiman persetujuan - Sama ada tindakan kedua res judicata - Sama ada tindakan kedua satu penyalahgunaan proses mahkamah - Sama ada tindakan kedua patut dibatalkan
P Mahandran Perumal lwn. P Puvanasvaran A Perumal & Yang Lain
(Abdul Karim Jalil PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 906 [HC]Res judicata - Ketakadilan dan penyalahgunaan proses mahkamah - Pihak-pihak mencapai kompromi dan memasuki penghakiman persetujuan - Plaintif memfailkan semula tindakan yang serupa - Efek penghakiman persetujuan - Sama ada tindakan kedua res judicata - Sama ada tindakan kedua satu penyalahgunaan proses mahkamah - Sama ada tindakan kedua patut dibatalkan - Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi 1980, A. 18 k. 19(1)
P Mahandran Perumal lwn. P Puvanasvaran A Perumal & Yang Lain
(Abdul Karim Jalil PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 906 [HC]UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH
Kanun Keseksaan - Seksyen 302 - Bunuh - Elemen-elemen yang perlu dibuktikan di bawah s. 300(c) Kanun Keseksaan - Pendakwaan bergantung kepada keterangan ikut keadaan - Tiada saksi yang melihat pembunuhan - Beban yang ditanggung oleh pendakwaan - Sama ada motif rompakan tertuduh relevan - Sama ada inferens di bawah s. 114(a) Akta Keterangan 1950 berbangkit - Sama ada sampel darah tertuduh yang diperolehi tanpa izin tertuduh boleh diterima - Tertuduh bergelut semasa ditangkap - Tertuduh enggan memberikan specimen tandatangan - Sama ada kes pendakwaan dibuktikan tanpa keraguan munasabah
PP lwn. Lai Weng Keat
(Ahmad Nasfy Yasin PK) [2013] 3 CLJ 923 [HC]
Legal Network Series Article
1. WHERE THERE’S A WILL, THERE’S NOT ALWAYS A WAY...* [Read excerpt]
by: SHELLEY MULHERIN** [2013] 1 LNS(A) xxxi2. THE USE OF SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE (SMS):
A NATIONAL AND GLOBAL CONCERN OR A PRIVILEGE* [Read excerpt]
by: NORMAN ZAKIYY & CHOW JEN-T'CHIANG** [2013] 1 LNS(A) xxxii
Principal Acts
| Number | Title | Date coming into force | Repealing |
| ACT 755 | Finance Act 2013 | 11 January 2013 | -Nil- |
| ACT 756 | Traditional And Complementary Medicine Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
| ACT 757 | Strata Management Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
| ACT 758 | Financial Services Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
| ACT 759 | Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | -Nil- |
Amending Acts
| Number | Title | Date coming into force | Principal/Amending Act No |
| ACT A1448 | Central Bank Of Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 | 8 February 2013 [PU(B) 44/2013] | ACT 701 |
| ACT A1449 | Industrial Designs (Amendment) Act 2013 | 1 July 2013 [PU(B) 86/2013] | ACT 552 |
| ACT A1450 | Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | ACT 318 |
| ACT A1451 | Perbadanan Kemajuan Filem Nasional Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 | 1 April 2013 [PU(B) 89/2013] | ACT 244 |
| ACT A1452 | Animals (Amendment) Act 2013 | Not Yet In Force | ACT 647 |
PU(A)
| Number | Title | Date of Publication | Date coming into force | Principal/Amending Act No |
| PU(A) 155/2013 | Factories And Machinery (Exemption To Petronas Gas Berhad, Gas Processing Plant-6, Paka, Terengganu) Order 2013 | 14 May 2013 | 15 May 2013 | ACT 139 |
| PU(A) 156/2013 | Dental (Amendment Of Second Schedule) (No. 2) Order 2013 | 15 May 2013 | 16 May 2013 | ACT 51 |
| PU(A) 157/2013 | Factories And Machinery (Exemption To Optimistic Organic Sdn Bhd, Teluk Kalong, Terengganu) Order 2013 | 15 May 2013 | 16 May 2013 | ACT 139 |
| PU(A) 158/2013 | Factories And Machinery (Exemption To Petronas Penapisan (Melaka) Sdn Bhd, Sungai Udang, Melaka) Order 2013 | 15 May 2013 | 16 May 2013 | ACT 139 |
| PU(A) 159/2013 | Customs (Values) (Crude Petroleum Oil) (No. 10) Order 2013 | 16 May 2013 | 16 May 2013 to 29 May 2013 | ACT 235 |
PU(B)
| Number | Title | Date of Publication | Date coming into force | Principal/Amending Act No |
| PU(B) 205/2013 | Appointment Under Paragraph 45(5)(a) - Corrigendum | 2 May 2013 | 3 May 2013 | ACT 267 |
| PU(B) 206/2013 | Appointment Under Subsection 3(1) | 2 May 2013 | See schedule of PU(B) 206/2013 | ACT 115 |
| PU(B) 207/2013 | Notice To Third Parties | 3 May 2013 | 4 May 2013 | ACT 613 |
| PU(B) 208/2013 | Notice To Third Parties | 3 May 2013 | 4 May 2013 | ACT 613 |
| PU(B) 209/2013 | Appointment Of Members Of The Commission | 7 May 2013 | 8 May 2013 | ACT 695 |
To view previous issues of the CLJ Bulletin, Click here
If you no longer wish to receive this email in the future, you may unsubscribe.
CLJ Bulletin: Copyright © 1997 - 2013 CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone: 03-42705421(DL) 03-42705400(GL) Fax No: 03-42705402