CLJ
Bulletin, Vol 2004, Issue 23
11 May 2004
Print this page ![]() |
CLJ Law MALAYSIA |
Introduction:
To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription
Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
New This Week Current Law Journal April (Part 4) 2004
FEDERAL COURT
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd v. Ngan Ching Wen
(Limitation - Interest - Arrears - Whether claim barred by s. 6(3) Limitation Act 1953)
[2004] 2
CLJ 241
Palm Oil Research And Development Board Malaysia & Anor v. Premium Vegetable Oils
Sdn Bhd
(Revenue law - Customs duty - Palm oil - Cess) [2004] 2 CLJ
265
Tan Geok Lan v. La Kuan
(Civil procedure - Settlement - Agreement by parties to resolve issues of fact -
Whether agreement amounts to a contract - Whether binding on parties) [2004] 2 CLJ
301
COURT OF APPEAL
Austral Amalgamated Tin Bhd v. Abdul Wahab Kopon & Ors & Anor Appeal
(Constitutional law - Courts - Subordinate court - Labour office, whether a subordinate
or inferior court) [2004] 2 CLJ
316
Chai Yee Chong v. Lew Thai
(Damages - Special damages - Medical expenses - Expenses at private hospital) [2004] 2 CLJ
321
SUBJECT INDEX
BANKRUPTCY
Interest - Commencement date for interest - Whether claim barred by s. 6(3)
Limitation Act 1953 - Decision of Federal Court in United Malayan Banking Corp Bhd v.
Ernest Cheong Yong Yin
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd v. Ngan Ching Wen
(Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdul Malek Ahmad & Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ)
[2004] 2
CLJ 241
Petition - Abuse of process - Creditor accepting payments from debtor after
commencing bankruptcy proceedings - Whether payments constituted complete accord and
satisfaction of debt - Whether merely part-payment of judgment debt - Whether acceptance
of payments rendered bankruptcy proceedings an abuse of process
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd v. Ngan Ching Wen
(Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdul Malek Ahmad & Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ) [2004] 2 CLJ
241
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Appeal - Appeal to High Court - From decision of labour officer - Whether appeal
is as of right irrespective of amount in dispute or value of subject matter - Employment
Act 1955, s. 77(1) - Whether right of appeal subject to s. 28(1) Courts of Judicature Act
1964 - Whether labour office a subordinate or inferior court - Whether labour office a
court at all - Whether inquiry conducted by labour officer amounts to judicial proceedings
Austral Amalgamated Tin Bhd v. Abdul Wahab Kopon & Ors & Anor Appeal
(Mokhtar Sidin, Mohd Ghazali Yusoff & Nik Hashim JJCA) [2004] 2 CLJ
316
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Courts - Subordinate court - Labour office, whether a subordinate or inferior
court - Whether a court at all - Whether ‘labour court’ exists under
the law - Appeals from labour office to High Court, whether subject to s. 28(1) Courts of
Judicature Act 1964 - Subordinate Courts Act 1948, s. 3(2) - Courts of Judicature Act
1964, s. 3
Austral Amalgamated Tin Bhd v. Abdul Wahab Kopon & Ors & Anor Appeal
(Mokhtar Sidin, Mohd Ghazali Yusoff & Nik Hashim JJCA) [2004] 2 CLJ
316
Interest - Judgment debt - Commencement date for interest - Whether claim barred
by s. 6(3) Limitation Act 1953 - Decision of Federal Court in United Malayan Banking Corp
Bhd v. Ernest Cheong Yong Yin
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd v. Ngan Ching Wen
(Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdul Malek Ahmad & Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ)
[2004] 2
CLJ 241
Settlement - Agreement by parties to resolve issues of fact - Whether agreement
amounts to a contract - Whether binding on parties - Whether binding despite not being
recorded as consent order or judgment - Whether trial judge should have given effect to
agreement - Whether parties should have been allowed to resile from agreement - Whether
decision to disregard agreement and proceed with trial injudicious - Urgent need for
expeditious disposal of cases in civil litigation - Whether agreement an attempt by
parties to dictate the terms and procedure of the trial
Tan Geok Lan v. La Kuan
(Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdul Hamid Mohamad & Mohd Noor Ahmad FCJJ) [2004] 2 CLJ
301
Trial - Conduct of proceedings - Control of - Whether in hands of judge or of
litigant - Agreement by parties to resolve or determine issues of fact - Whether
tantamount to dictating how trial court should conduct its proceedings - Whether such
agreements should always be upheld by the courts - Overriding need for expedient and
inexpensive disposal of cases in contentious litigation
Tan Geok Lan v. La Kuan
(Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdul Hamid Mohamad & Mohd Noor Ahmad FCJJ) [2004] 2 CLJ
301
DAMAGES
Special damages - Medical expenses - Expenses at private hospital - Principles
of recoverability
Chai Yee Chong v. Lew Thai
(Abdul Hamid Mohamad, Mohd Noor Ahmad FCJJ & Abdul Aziz Mohamad JCA) [2004] 2 CLJ
321
LABOUR LAW
Labour office - Appeal - Appeal from decision of labour officer to High Court -
Whether appeal is as of right irrespective of amount in dispute or value of subject matter
- Employment Act 1955, s. 77(1) - Whether right of appeal subject to
s. 28(1) Courts of Judicature Act 1964 - Whether labour office a subordinate or inferior
court - Whether labour office a court at all - Whether inquiry conducted by labour officer
amounts to judicial proceedings
Austral Amalgamated Tin Bhd v. Abdul Wahab Kopon & Ors & Anor Appeal
(Mokhtar Sidin, Mohd Ghazali Yusoff & Nik Hashim JJCA) [2004] 2 CLJ
316
LIMITATION
Interest - Arrears - Whether claim barred by s. 6(3) Limitation Act 1953 -
Decision of Federal Court in United Malayan Banking Corp Bhd v. Ernest Cheong Yong Yin
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd v. Ngan Ching Wen
(Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Abdul Malek Ahmad & Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ)
[2004] 2
CLJ 241
REVENUE LAW
Customs duty - Palm oil - Cess - Cess imposed on crude oil extracted from oil
palm fruits and seeds - Whether also includes crude oil extracted from oil palm kernel -
Whether reference to be made specifically to kernel if cess is to be imposed - Palm Oil
Research and Development Act 1979, s. 14(1) - Palm Oil (Research Cess) Order 1979, paras.
1-6
Palm Oil Research And Development Board Malaysia & Anor v. Premium Vegetable Oils
Sdn Bhd
(Haidar Mohd Noor CJ (Malaya), Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak) & Gopal Sri Ram
JCA) [2004]
2 CLJ 265
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
Construction of statutes - Taxing statutes - Approach to be taken by courts -
Whether purposive in view of s. 17A Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967 - Whether Palm Oil
Research and Development Act 1979 a taxing statute - Cess imposed on crude oil extracted
from oil palm fruits and seeds - Whether includes crude oil extracted from oil palm kernel
- Palm Oil Research and Development Act 1979, s. 14(1) - Palm Oil (Research Cess) Order
1979, paras. 1-6
Palm Oil Research And Development Board Malaysia & Anor v. Premium Vegetable Oils
Sdn Bhd
(Haidar Mohd Noor CJ (Malaya), Steve Shim CJ (Sabah & Sarawak) & Gopal Sri Ram
JCA) [2004]
2 CLJ 265
TORT
Negligence - Duty of care - Duty of one employee owed to another - Whether
special relationship in existence
Chai Yee Chong v. Lew Thai
(Abdul Hamid Mohamad, Mohd Noor Ahmad FCJJ & Abdul Aziz Mohamad JCA) [2004] 2 CLJ
321
CLJ Bulletin
To Subscribe/Unsubscribe go to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 CLJ Legal Network Sdn
Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone:
60-3-4270-5400 Fax No : 60-3-4270 5401 & 60-3-4270 5402