Legal Network Series

[2014] 1 LNS 187	R R CHELLIAH BROTHERS lwn. KANAN@SINNATHAMBY VARATHAMUDALIAR; AMANAH RAYA BERHAD (PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS)	PROSEDUR SIVIL: Penggantungan pelaksanaan - Permohonan untuk menggantung pelaksanaan perintah garnismen - Alasan-alasan permohonan - Rayuan terhadap keputusan mahkamah - Rayuan oleh pemegang amanah awam - Sama ada rayuan terhadap keputusan mahkamah beroperasi sebagai menggantung pelaksanaan keputusan - Sama ada ketentuan perintah garnismen terhadap pihak yang digarnis wajar dimuktamadkan dengan keputusan mahkamah rayuan PROSEDUR SIVIL: Penggantungan pelaksanaan - Permohonan untuk menggantung pelaksanaan perintah garnismen - Alasan-alasan permohonan - Keadaan khas - Sama ada alasan jumlah yang telah dibayar sukar dituntut balik jika rayuan pihak yang digarnis berjaya merupakan keadaan khas - Sama ada terdapat keadaan khas untuk menjustifikasikan penggantungan pelaksanaan perintah sehingga rayuan dimuktamadkan UNDANG-UNDANG SYARIKAT: Penggulungan syarikat - Ketidakmampuan untuk membayar hutang - Pihak yang digarnis merupakan pemegang amanah awam - Sama ada pemegang amanah awam berkemampuan membayar wang yang telah diperintahkan
[2014] 1 LNS 254	BANK PERUSAHAAN KECIL & SEDERHANA MALAYSIA BERHAD lwn. PINGGIR MERPATI SDN BHD & YANG LAIN	PROSEDUR SIVIL: Res judicata - Isu-isu persamaan - Kewujudan tindakan guaman awal - Tindakan guaman awal mempunyai keterangan saksi-saksi dan dokumen yang sama - Sama ada tindakan plaintif terhalang di bawah doktrin res judicata - Sama ada isu-isu yang dibangkitkan adalah sama dengan keputusan dalam tindakan guaman awal KONTRAK: Penamatan - Notis penamatan - Penamatan perjanjian kemudahan - Sama ada notis penamatan telah mengikut terma dan syarat perjanjian - Sama ada notis tuntutan boleh menjadi notis penamatan sesuatu perjanjian kemudahan - Sama ada terdapat notis penamatan perjanjian kemudahan yang sah untuk menamatkan kemudahan pinjaman KETERANGAN: Beban pembuktian - Frod - Perlakuan frod bersifat jenayah - Pemalsuan dokumen - Sama ada beban pembuktian dalam dakwaan perlakuan frod yang bersifat jenayah adalah pada tahap tanpa keraguan yang munasabah - Sama ada plaintif boleh semata-mata bergantung kepada laporan siasatan dalaman odit untuk membuktikan dakwaan perlakuan frod bersifat jenayah KETERANGAN: Dengar cakap - Laporan siasatan dalaman odit - Sama ada laporan odit yang telah disediakan melalui maklumat yang didapati menerusi temubual dan pengesahan lisan adalah bersifat dengar cakap - Sama ada kandungan laporan odit telah dibuktikan secara keterangan asas seperti yang dikehendaki oleh ss. 62 dan 64 Akta Keterangan 1950 PERBANKAN: Liabiliti - Tanggungan bersifat 'indemnity' - Sama ada terdapat keperluan untuk membuktikan liabiliti peminjam terlebih dahulu sebelum mengambil tindakan terhadap pihak yang menanggung indemniti
[2014] 1 LNS 459	PP lwn. NIK MOHD AMIR NIK MUHAMMAD & SATU LAGI	UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH: Rasuah - Penerimaan wang suapan oleh pegawai badan awam - Wang komisen - Anggapan di bawah s. 42(1) Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997 - Sama ada anggapan di bawah s. 42(1) Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997 terpakai - Sama ada terdapat penerimaan wang untuk tujuan sebagai wang rasuah - Sama ada wang komisen terjumlah di bawah takrifan suapan - Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997, s. 2 PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Pendakwaan - Kes pendakwaan - Keraguan - Jenayah rasuah - Anggapan di bawah s. 42(1) Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997 - Sama ada tertuduh telah menimbulkan keraguan yang munasabah terhadap kes pendakwaan - Sama ada tertuduh dapat mematahkan anggapan di bawah s. 42(1) Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997
[2014] 1 LNS 713	QUINTRAZ SDN BHD v. RAMPAI GALAKSI SDN BHD	COMPANY LAW: Winding up - Liquidators - Whether appropriate for petitioner company's counsel to represent both the petitioner company and liquidator - Whether court-appointed liquidator being an officer of the court should be independent and perceived to be so - Whether actual and perceived independence of liquidator jeopardized LEGAL PROFESSION: Practice of law - Practice and etiquette - Whether petitioner company's counsel could represent liquidator - Whether possibility of embarrassment within meaning of r. 3(a) and (b)(i) of the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 - Whether difficult for her to maintain her professional independence - Whether incompatible with best interest of administration of justice COMPANY LAW: Winding up - Dissolution - Wound up respondent company had no assets - Only petitioner company filed proof of debt - Final meetings of respondent company's creditors and contributories held - Whether respondent company should be dissolved - Companies Act 1965, s. 239(d) - Whether liquidator should be released COMPANY LAW: Winding up - Liquidators - Order sought for respondent company's books to be destroyed - Liquidator did not take respondent company's books into custody - Whether of benefit to any party for the court to order destruction of respondent company's books - Whether detrimental to liquidator if prayer refused - Whether liquidator exposed to financial loss by keeping respondent company's books - Whether destruction order may prejudice lawful claims of other creditors
[2014] 1 LNS 866	GUINDARAJOO VEGADASON v. SATGUNASINGAM BALASINGAM	SUCCESSION: Administration - Inter vivos gift - Plaintiff applied to revoke letters of administration (LA) granted to defendant and claimed ownership of house given to him by deceased as a gift during her lifetime - Deceased was sole beneficiary to the estate of her deceased daughter, Ariasakthi - Whether deceased entitled to sell or give away as a gift, her entitlement of the estate before completion of the administration of the estate of Ariasakthi - Defendant later obtained order to transfer house to himself - Whether house was an inter vivos gift to plaintiff and not part of estate of deceased - Whether plaintiff had an equitable interest in the house based on proprietary estoppel SUCCESSION: Administration - Revocation of grant - Non-compliance by plaintiff with Rules of Court 2012, O. 72 r. 2(3) - Whether fatal - No objection by defendant for last 10 years - Whether any prejudice or damage suffered by defendant by such non-compliance - Whether defendant waived right to object - Plaintiff not a beneficiary under both estates of Ariasakthi and deceased - Whether he had requisite locus to apply for revocation of the letters of administration - Whether the two LA granted to defendant should be revoked

CLJ 2015 Volume 4 (Part 4)

COURT

COURT OF APPEAL

EON Bank Bhd v. Raja Halinuddin Raja Halid
(Civil Procedure - Striking out - Whether there was waiver by defendant in conduct of proceeding which negated striking out) [2015] 4 CLJ 425 [CA]

Francis Joseph Puthucheary v. Eng Securities Sdn Bhd
(Civil Procedure - Striking out - Notice of assessment of damages - Case management proceedings) [2015] 4 CLJ 433 [CA]

Mohammed Rafi v. PP & Other Appeals
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971 - Whether there were fatal gaps in prosecution's cases) [2015] 4 CLJ 446 [CA]

Nik Rahimi Wan Hassan & Anor v. Nik Rahmat Wan Hassan
(Trusts - Validity - Whether instruments in creation of trust and power attorney valid) [2015] 4 CLJ 462 [CA]

Norazleen Mohammed Mustaffa v. Dr Omar Md Isa & Anor
(Tort - Medical negligence - Whether surgeon negligent in carrying out surgery) [2015] 4 CLJ 474 [CA]

PP v. Cho Sing Koo & Anor
(Criminal Law; Evidence; Criminal Procedure - Criminal breach of trust - Whether directors had power and control over company's funds) [2015] 4 CLJ 491 [CA]

Salak Land Development Sdn Bhd v. Pentadbir Tanah Kuala Langat & Ors
Administrative Law; Public Utilities; Land Law - Exercise of administrative powers - Judicial review - State Authority's decision on award of compensation) [2015] 4 CLJ 506 [CA]

Yeoh Siew Kean v. Tay & Helen Wong
(Tort; Legal Profession - Professional negligence - Advice to client to terminate sale and purchase agreement - Whether solicitor liable for giving negligent advice) [2015] 4 CLJ 517 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Maybank Islamic Bhd v. M-10 Builders Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Banking; Limitation - Islamic Banking - Murabahah overdraft facility - Whether facility null and void) [2015] 4 CLJ 526 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Exercise of administrative powers - Judicial review - Certiorari and mandamus - Application for - State Authority's decision on award of compensation - Examination of - Whether there was illegality, procedural impropriety or irrationality - Whether appellant had right to resort to supervisory jurisdiction of court to examine decision - Whether there was error affecting merits - Whether State Authority took into consideration relevant factors - Electricity Supply Act 1990, ss. 11 & 16 - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 53 r. 3(2)
Salak Land Development Sdn Bhd v. Pentadbir Tanah Kuala Langat & Ors
(Abdul Wahab Patail, Aziah Ali, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 506 [CA]

BANKING

Banks and banking business - Islamic banking - Murabahah concept of financing - Whether camouflaged in form of al-Bainah - Whether rendered contract null, void and unenforceable - Whether conventional transaction
Maybank Islamic Bhd v. M-10 Builders Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Asmabi Mohamad J) [2015] 4 CLJ 526 [HC]

Banks and banking business - Islamic banking - Murabahah overdraft facility - Charge of ta'widh - Requirements - Whether element of default or neglect proven - Whether claim for ta'widh justified
Maybank Islamic Bhd v. M-10 Builders Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Asmabi Mohamad J) [2015] 4 CLJ 526 [HC]

Banks and banking business - Islamic Banking - Murabahah overdraft facility ('MOD facility') - Purchase and resale of same assets - Whether agreement complied with murabahah concept of financing - Whether purchase and resale of same assets prohibited under shariah principal of financing - Whether unilateral revision of MOD facility - Whether facility null and void
Maybank Islamic Bhd v. M-10 Builders Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Asmabi Mohamad J) [2015] 4 CLJ 526 [HC]

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Striking out - Application for - Whether trial judge considered relevant matters - Whether there was waiver by defendant in conduct of proceeding which negated striking out - Whether failure to assert objection to subsequent proceedings amounted to waiver
EON Bank Bhd v. Raja Halinuddin Raja Halid
(KN Segara, Alizatul Khair Osman, Mohtarudin Baki JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 425 [CA]

Striking out - Notice of assessment of damages - Appeal against - Case management proceedings - Appellant successfully obtained judgment to establish liability against respondent - Assessment of damages to be addressed - Whether appellant had not complied with and defied directions of Deputy Registrar - Whether appellant demonstrated consistent effort to obtain required documents - Whether there was abuse of court process - Whether appellant deprived of resultant benefit of successful conclusion of claim - Whether judge erred in apprehending material facts - Whether appellate intervention warranted
Francis Joseph Puthucheary v. Eng Securities Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Idrus Harun, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 433 [CA]

Striking out - Notice of assessment of damages - Appeal against - Res judicata - Applicability - Whether res judicata permitted to bar claim from being relitigated in subsequent action - Determination of facts of each case - Whether application of doctrine of res judicata would lead to unjust result
Francis Joseph Puthucheary v. Eng Securities Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Idrus Harun, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 433 [CA]

CRIMINAL LAW

Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971 - Sections 3 & 3A - Discharging gunshots from pistol during scheduled offence - Whether first and second appellants accomplices in discharge of firearms - Element of knowledge - Whether proved - Whether first and second appellants had knowledge that third appellant carried firearms - Identity of deceased - Whether proved - Admissibility of post mortem report concluding death caused by firearm injury - Whether produced in accordance with s. 32 Evidence Act 1950 - Whether fourth person could have fired shots that killed deceased - Identification parade - Whether properly held - Whether court identification of third appellant of value or significance - Prosecution's failure to call important witnesses - Whether there were fatal gaps in prosecution's cases - Whether there were infirmities in prosecution's case - Whether conviction of appellants safe
Mohammed Rafi v. PP & Other Appeals
(Balia Yusof Wahi, Mohtarudin Baki, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 446 [CA]

Penal Code - Section 409 - Criminal breach of trust - Directors of company gave oral instruction to prepare payment vouchers to unauthorised individuals - Whether directors had power and control over company's funds - Whether directors held dominant position - Whether directors could give oral instructions to issue payment vouchers due to company's stringent procedure - Whether presumption under s. 409B(1)(b)(ii) Penal Code rebutted - Whether prima facie case established
PP v. Cho Sing Koo & Anor
(Mohtarudin Baki, Ahmadi Asnawi, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 491 [CA]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Conviction and sentence - Appeal against - Appellants charged under ss. 3 & 3A of the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971 - Discharging gunshots from pistol during scheduled offence - Whether first and second appellants accomplices in discharge of firearms - Element of knowledge - Whether proved - Whether first and second appellants had knowledge that third appellant carried firearms - Identity of deceased - Whether proved - Admissibility of post mortem report concluding death caused by firearm injury - Whether produced in accordance with s. 32 Evidence Act 1950 - Whether fourth person could have fired shots that killed deceased - Identification parade - Whether properly held - Whether court identification of third appellant of little value or significance - Prosecution's failure to call important witnesses - Whether there were fatal gaps in prosecution's cases - Whether there were infirmities in prosecution's case - Whether conviction of appellants safe
Mohammed Rafi v. PP & Other Appeals
(Balia Yusof Wahi, Mohtarudin Baki, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 446 [CA]

Appeal - Witness's credibility - Whether matter to be decided by trial court - Whether appellate court interfered with trial court's findings of fact since it was perverse and could not be supported
PP v. Cho Sing Koo & Anor
(Mohtarudin Baki, Ahmadi Asnawi, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 491 [CA]

EVIDENCE

Witness - Credibility of - Whether truthful witness - Whether evidence corroborated - Whether interested witness - Whether discrepancies arose in witness's evidence - Whether related to trivial matters - Whether testimony of witness passed test of probability
PP v. Cho Sing Koo & Anor
(Mohtarudin Baki, Ahmadi Asnawi, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 491 [CA]

LAND LAW

Right of way - Compensation - Electricity Supply Act 1990, ss. 11 & 16 - Application for judicial review on State Authority's decision on award of compensation - Examination of - Whether there was illegality, procedural impropriety or irrationality - Whether appellant had right to resort to supervisory jurisdiction of court to examine decision - Whether there was error affecting merits - Whether State Authority took into consideration relevant factors - Electricity Supply Act 1990, ss. 11 & 16 - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 53 r. 3(2)
Salak Land Development Sdn Bhd v. Pentadbir Tanah Kuala Langat & Ors
(Abdul Wahab Patail, Aziah Ali, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 506 [CA]

LIMITATION

Accrual of cause of action - Whether action filed out of time - Whether plaintiff slept on its rights to claim ta'widh - Whether conduct equivalent to waiver - Whether doctrine of laches or acquiescence applied - Limitation Act 1953, s. 6
Maybank Islamic Bhd v. M-10 Builders Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Asmabi Mohamad J) [2015] 4 CLJ 526 [CA]

LEGAL PROFESSION

Duty of care - Negligence - Action by client against solicitor - Advice to client to terminate sale and purchase agreement - Whether solicitor liable for giving negligent advice - Whether negligent advice caused client to be precluded from claiming specific performance and/or damages in lieu of - Whether client established entitlement to damages if solicitor had rendered proper advice - Whether client must be compensated on restitutio in integrum basis
Yeoh Siew Kean v. Tay & Helen Wong
(Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim, Mah Weng Kwai JJCA, Prasad Sandosham Abraham J) [2015] 4 CLJ 517 [CA]

PUBLIC UTILITIES

Electricity - Local authority - Compensation - Application for judicial review on State Authority's decision on award of compensation - Examination of - Whether there was illegality, procedural impropriety or irrationality - Whether appellant had right to resort to supervisory jurisdiction of court to examine decision - Whether there was error affecting merits - Whether State Authority took into consideration relevant factors - Electricity Supply Act 1990, ss. 11 & 16 - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 53 r. 3(2)
Salak Land Development Sdn Bhd v. Pentadbir Tanah Kuala Langat & Ors
(Abdul Wahab Patail, Aziah Ali, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 506 [CA]

TORT

Medical negligence - Consent - Surgery on spinal cord - Risk of paralysis - Whether surgeon informed patient and/or parents on risk of paralysis prior to surgery - Whether risk of paralysis should have been specifically mentioned prior to surgery
Norazleen Mohammed Mustaffa v. Dr Omar Md Isa & Anor
(Mohd Hishamudin Yunus, Balia Yusof Wahi, Mohd Zawawi Salleh JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 474 [CA]

Medical negligence - Duty of Care - Breach of - Standard of care expected of surgeon - Whether surgeon negligent in carrying out surgery - Whether surgeon caused pedicle screws to impinge on to appellant's spinal cord - Whether appellant's paralysis was caused by pedicle screws impinged into spinal cord - Whether non-usage of `Somatosensory Evoked Potential' monitoring machine amounted to negligence - Whether surgeon took all necessary precaution to avoid injuring appellant during surgery
Norazleen Mohammed Mustaffa v. Dr Omar Md Isa & Anor
(Mohd Hishamudin Yunus, Balia Yusof Wahi, Mohd Zawawi Salleh JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 474 [CA]

Negligence - Duty of care - Professional negligence - Action by client against solicitor - Advice to client to terminate sale and purchase agreement - Whether solicitor liable for giving negligent advice - Whether negligent advice caused client to be precluded from claiming specific performance and/or damages in lieu - Whether client established entitlement to damages if solicitor had rendered proper advice - Whether client must be compensated on restitutio in integrum basis
Yeoh Siew Kean v. Tay & Helen Wong
(Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim, Mah Weng Kwai JJCA, Prasad Sandosham Abraham J) [2015] 4 CLJ 517 [CA]

TRUSTS

Void trust - Validity - Allegation that deceased had created trust over property for granddaughter - Plaintiff appointed as trustee and attorney - Plaintiff claimed for property in capacities as trustee and attorney in High Court - Claim challenged by defendants - Whether instruments in creation of trust and power attorney valid - Whether contents of documents consistent - Whether property ought to be distributed by way of faraid
Nik Rahimi Wan Hassan & Anor v. Nik Rahmat Wan Hassan
(Mohd Hishamudin Yunus, Aziah Ali, Mohtarudin Baki JJCA) [2015] 4 CLJ 462 [CA]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article(s)

1. THE TRANSMILE DECISION: THE PARI PASSU PRINCIPLE
    IN RELATION TO SUBORDINATION AGREEMENTS* ^{[Read excerpt]}
    by: LUKAS LIM XIA WEI [2015] 1 LNS(A) xli

2. PELAKSANAAN PERINTAH NAFKAH IDDAH SELEPAS PENCERAIAN
    (TALAK RAJ'I): KAJIAN DI MAHKAMAH RENDAH SYARIAH PUTRAJAYA ^{[Read excerpt]}
    oleh: ABDUL HALIM ZULKIFLI*, NIK NOR AFIPAH MOHAMAD** [2015] 1 LNS(A) xliii

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number	Title	Date coming into force	Repealing
ACT 766	Netting Of Financial Agreements Act 2015	30 March 2015 [PU(B) 131/2015]	-Nil-
ACT 765	Malaysian Airline System Berhad (Administration) Act 2015	20 February 2015 [PU(B) 37/2015]	-Nil-
ACT 764	Finance (No. 2) Act 2014	The Income Tax Act 1967 [Act 53] see s 3; The Petroleum (Income Tax) Act 1967 [Act 543] see s 24; The Real Property Gains Tax Act 1976 [Act 169] see s 27	-Nil-
ACT 763	Yayasan Guru Tun Hussein Onn Act 2014	Not Yet In Force	-Nil-
ACT 762	Goods And Services Tax Act 2014	1 July 2014 - Parts I, II, IV, VI and XVI, ss 10, 11, 17, 18, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 44, 50, 56, 59, 61, 64, 65, 69, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 160, 163, 183, 184 and 197, the First Schedule and Second Schedule to the Act; 1 April 2015 - Parts IX, XIII, XVII and XVIII, ss 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51, 52, 53, 57, 58, 60, 62, 63, 66, 67, 68, 70, 84, 88, 89, 90, 91, 94, 98, 106, 108, 109, 110, 122, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 161, 162, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195 and 196, the Third Schedule and Fourth Schedule to the Act [PU(B) 319/2014]	-Nil-

Amending Acts

Number	Title	Date coming into force	Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1481	Quantity Surveyors (Amendment) Act 2015	Not Yet In Force	ACT 487
ACT A1480	Architects (Amendment) Act 2015	Not Yet In Force except for paragraphs 3(d) and (p) and section 23 come into operation on 1 June 2015	ACT 117
ACT A1479	Registration Of Engineers (Amendment) Act 2015	Not Yet In Force	ACT 138
ACT A1478	Companies Commission Of Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2015	20 February 2015 [PU(B) 45/2015] except sections 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15	ACT 614
ACT A1477	Limited Liability Partnership (Amendment) Act 2015	Not Yet In Force	ACT 743

PU(A)

Number	Title	Date of Publication	Date coming into force	Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 102/2015	Lembaga Pembangunan Industri Pembinaan Malaysia (Service Of Notice) Regulations 2015	29 May 2015	1 June 2015	ACT 520
PU(A) 101/2015	Lembaga Industri Pembinaan Malaysia (Compounding Of Offences) Regulations 2015	29 May 2015	1 June 2015	ACT 520
PU(A) 100/2015	Road Transport (Prohibition Of Use Of Road) (City Of Kuala Lumpur) Order 2015	29 May 2015	1 June 2015	ACT 333
PU(A) 99/2015	National Land Code (Survey Fees) (Amendment) Order 2015	29 May 2015	1 June 2015	LN 486/1965
PU(A) 98/2015	Customs Duties (Exemption) (Amendment) Order 2015	28 May 2015	29 May 2015	PU(A) 371/2013

PU(B)

Number	Title	Date of Publication	Date coming into force	Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 239/2015	Appointment Of Date Of Coming Into Operation	29 May 2015	30 May 2015	ACT A1450
PU(B) 238/2015	Appointment Of Date Of Coming Into Operation	29 May 2015	30 May 2015	ACT A1450
PU(B) 237/2015	Appointment Of Date Of Coming Into Operation	29 May 2015	30 May 2015	ACT 757
PU(B) 236/2015	Appointment Of Henry Gurney School	29 May 2015	30 May 2015	ACT 611
PU(B) 235/2015	Notification Of Values Of Crude Palm Oil Under Section 12	29 May 2015	1 June 2015 to 30 June 2015	ACT 235

To view previous issues of the CLJ Bulletin, Click here
If you no longer wish to receive this email in the future, you may unsubscribe.

CLJ Bulletin: Copyright © 1997 - 2015 CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone: 03-42705421(DL) 03-42705400(GL) Fax No: 03-42705402