CLJ Bulletin, Vol 2007, Issue 27
27 July 2007
CLJ Law MALAYSIA
Print this page![]() |
Introduction:
To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription
Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
New This Week - | 1. CLJ July (Part 4) 2007 |
2. CLJ Supp July (Part 2) 2007 |
COURT
FEDERAL COURT
PP v. Abdul Rahman Akif
(Trafficking in cannabis - Possession - Inference as to knowledge - Whether deducible
from totality of evidence) [2007] 4 CLJ
337
COURT OF APPEAL
Ahmad Abd Majeed lwn. Habibah Abdul Majid & Satu Lagi
(Pesaka kecil - Perintah Pembahagian - Fraud - Kesan-kesan) [2007] 4 CLJ
355
Boustead Estates Agency Sdn Bhd v. Pentadbir Tanah, Baling, Kedah
(Land acquisition - Compensation - Severance and injurious affection) [2007] 4 CLJ
375
HIGH COURT
Noorliyana Yasira Mohd Noor lwn. Menteri Pendidikan Malaysia & Yang Lain
(Certiorari dan mandamus - Membatalkan perkataan "GAGAL" dalam penyata
keputusan UPSR) [2007] 4 CLJ
382
PP lwn. Shahareeil Said
(Semakan - Majistret - Melupus kes di dalam kamar tanpa kehadiran orang kena saman)
[2007] 4
CLJ 405
SUBJECT INDEX
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Dangerous drugs - Trafficking in 4826.9 grammes of cannabis - Element of possession -
Drugs found in packages under seats of car driven by accused - Accused alone in car and in
possession of car for 7 months prior to arrest - Whether having physical control of drugs
and possessing requisite knowledge as to contents of packages - Inference as to knowledge
- Whether deducible from totality of evidence - Presumption of trafficking - Whether
applicable - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, ss. 6, 37(d), 37(da) 39B(1)(a), 39A(2)
PP v. Abdul Rahman Akif
(Ahmad Fairuz CJ (Malaysia), Richard Malanjum CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Arifin Zakaria
FCJ) [2007]
4 CLJ 337
LAND LAW
Acquisition of land - Compensation - Oil palm estate - Land severed into two upon
acquisition and construction of highway - Damage suffered by owner - Whether State
Government liable for severance and injurious affection - Land Acquisition Act 1960, s.
36(1) - Road Transport Act 1987, s. 85(1)
Boustead Estates Agency Sdn Bhd v. Pentadbir Tanah, Baling, Kedah
(Gopal Sri Ram, Zulkefli Makinudin & Zainun Ali JJCA) [2007] 4 CLJ
375 [CA]
INDEKS PERKARA
PEWARISAN
Pembahagian pesaka - Undang-Undang Islam - Wasiat - Tahap berwasiat - Sama ada terhad
kepada 1/3 bahagian pesaka - Wasiat atas keseluruhan pesaka - Sama ada tak sah - Akta
Harta Pesaka Kecil (Pembahagian) 1955
Ahmad Abd Majeed lwn. Habibah Abdul Majid & Satu Lagi
(Mokhtar Sidin, Hashim Yusoff & Zulkefli Makinudin HHMR) [2007] 4 CLJ
355 [CA]
Pesaka kecil - Perintah pembahagian - Fraud - Perintah pembahagian diberi berasaskan
penipuan oleh pemohon - Sama ada tak sah - Sama ada terbatal - Akta Harta Pesaka Kecil
(Pembahagian) 1955, s. 3(2)
Ahmad Abd Majeed lwn. Habibah Abdul Majid & Satu Lagi
(Mokhtar Sidin, Hashim Yusoff & Zulkefli Makinudin HHMR) [2007] 4 CLJ
355 [CA]
PIHAK BERKUASA AWAM
Remedi - Certiorari dan mandamus - Permohonan membatalkan catatan "Perkara Asas
Fardhu Ain - GAGAL" di dalam kenyataan keputusan UPSR dan mengeluarkan kenyataan baru
- Sama ada pihak sekolah patut menyediakan pemohon untuk peperiksaan subjek tersebut -
Sama ada pemohon dikecualikan mengambil peperiksaan subjek tersebut - Sama ada responden
bertindak di luar bidangkuasa - Akta Pendidikan 1996, ss. 3(2), 8, 18(2)
Noorliyana Yasira Mohd Noor lwn. Menteri Pendidikan Malaysia & Yang Lain
(VT Singham H) [2007] 4 CLJ
382 [HC]
PROSEDUR JENAYAH
Semakan - Majistret, kuasa-kuasa - Kuasa mendengar dan melupus kes - Saman trafik - Kes
dilupus dalam kamar tanpa kehadiran orang kena saman dan pegawai pendakwa - Sama ada
menjejaskan proses keadilan - Sama ada tak sah dan batal - Kanun Acara Jenayah, ss. 47(b),
137, 173(a), 323-327, 376, 377, 419, 422 - Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964, s. 31 - Akta
Mahkamah-Mahkamah Rendah 1948, s. 101(1) - Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987, s. 23(2) -
Perlembagaan Persekutuan, per. 145(3)
PP lwn. Shahareeil Said
(Zainal Adzam Ghani h) [2007] 4 CLJ
405 [HC]
PROSEDUR SIVIL
Rayuan - Keputusan Pentadbir Tanah - Pesaka kecil, perintah pembahagian - Tempoh rayuan
terluput tanpa disedari disebabkan perlakuan fraud - Remedi alternatif - Sama boleh
memohon deklarasi untuk membatalkan keputusan - Akta Harta Pesaka Kecil (Pembahagian)
1955, s. 29
Ahmad Abd Majeed lwn. Habibah Abdul Majid & Satu Lagi
(Mokhtar Sidin, Hashim Yusoff & Zulkefli Makinudin HHMR) [2007] 4 CLJ
355 [CA]
UNDANG-UNDANG PENTADBIRAN
Remedi - Certiorari dan mandamus - Permohonan membatalkan catatan "Perkara Asas
Fardhu Ain - GAGAL" di dalam kenyataan keputusan UPSR dan mengeluarkan kenyataan baru
- Sama ada pihak sekolah patut menyediakan pemohon untuk peperiksaan subjek tersebut -
Sama ada pemohon dikecualikan mengambil peperiksaan subjek tersebut - Sama ada responden
bertindak di luar bidangkuasa - Akta Pendidikan 1996, ss. 3(2), 8, 18(2)
Noorliyana Yasira Mohd Noor lwn. Menteri Pendidikan Malaysia & Yang Lain
(VT Singham H) [2007] 4 CLJ
382 [HC]
2. CLJ Supp July (Part 2) 2007
COURT
HIGH COURT
Asmth Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Johor Bahru & Anor
(Administrative Law - Judicial review - Application for - Reference of certain
questions to High Court under s. 36(2) Land Acquisition Act 1960) [2007] 8 CLJ
445
Exxonmobil Exploration And Production Malaysia Inc v. Petrokapal Sdn Bhd
(Civil Procedure - Judgments and orders - Enforcement of - Order for plaintiff to
submit documents for inspection) [2007] 8 CLJ
477
John Lo Thau Fah v. Face Resorts Bhd
(Summary judgment - Appeal against - Terms and conditions of agreement (letter)) [2007] 8 CLJ
484
L'Grande Development Sdn Bhd v. Bukit Cerakah Development Sdn Bhd
(Building contract - Construction - Agreement in writing) [2007] 8 CLJ
507
Osman Hassan lwn. Ketua Polis Negara & Satu Lagi
(Polis - Tindakan disiplin - Pembuangan - Pembuangan kerja seorang anggota polis) [2007] 8 CLJ
526
PP v. Wong Wei Choon
(Criminal Procedure - Sentence - Juvenile offender) [2007] 8 CLJ
536
SUBJECT INDEX
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Judicial review - Application for - Applicant sought order for certiorari to quash land
administrator's award and decision to refuse to refer certain issues to High Court -
Reference of certain questions to High Court under s. 36(2) Land Acquisition Act 1960 -
Issues for determination - Whether application barred under s. 68 of the Land Acquisition
Act 1960 - Whether reference to High Court under s. 36(2) of Land Acquisition Act 1960
precedes an award - Whether applicants provided bona fide reasons for filing application
while a land reference under s. 37 of Land Acquisition Act 1960 pending in different forum
- Whether application bad for duplicity - Whether land administrator acted correctly when
rejecting applicant's request to refer to High Court under s. 36(2) of Land Acquisition
Act 1960 - Whether acquisition proceedings invalidated by alleged early entry into
possession and demolition of buildings on subject lands prior to date of gazette
notification - Whether land administrator must refer questions of interpretation that
arose in the course of enquiry to court for determination - Whether court grants an order
of certiorari and mandamus
Asmth Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Johor Bahru & Anor
(Syed Ahmad Helmy J) [2007] 8 CLJ
445 [HC]
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Judgments and orders - Enforcement of - Order for plaintiff to submit documents for
inspection - Whether documents for purposes of the trial' - Whether defendant should
be able to examine documents - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 45
Exxonmobil Exploration And Production Malaysia Inc v. Petrokapal Sdn Bhd
(Kang Hwee Gee J) [2007] 8 CLJ
477 [HC]
Summary judgment - Appeal against - Terms and conditions of agreement (letter) -
Whether there was an agreement enforceable at law - Contracts Act 1950, s. 10 - Whether
satisfied - Whether letter needed further judicial scrutiny - Whether plaintiff's claim
for a million Singapore Dollars a genuine contractual pre estimate damage - Whether could
be basis for summary judgment - Whether purported agreement contained uncertain terms -
Contracts Act 1950, s. 30 - Specific Relief Act 1950, s. 20(1)(c) - Whether plaintiff
could succeed in claim for summary judgment - Whether defendant raised triable issues
John Lo Thau Fah v. Face Resorts Bhd
(Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC) [2007] 8 CLJ
484 [HC]
CONTRACT
Agreement - Terms and conditions - Whether enforceable at law - Contracts Act 1950, s.
10 - Whether satisfied - Whether needed further judicial scrutiny - Whether plaintiff's
claim for a million Singapore dollars a genuine contractual pre-estimate damage - Whether
could be basis for summary judgment - Whether purported agreement contained uncertain
terms - Contracts Act 1950, s. 30 - Specific Relief Act 1950, s. 20(1)(c) - Summary
judgment - Whether plaintiff could succeed in claim for summary judgment - Whether triable
issues raised
John Lo Thau Fah v. Face Resorts Bhd
(Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC) [2007] 8 CLJ
484 [HC]
Building contract - Construction - Agreement in writing - Defendant's failure to settle
interim certificates in full thereby incurring outstanding sum yet to be paid to plaintiff
- Whether constituted a breach of an essential term of contract - Whether defendant could
plead as defence that it was not liable to pay because it had claim of a much larger sum
against plaintiff yet to be decided in another civil suit - Whether defendant could make
interim certificate the basis of its cross claim - Whether defendant could use its larger
counterclaim to set off plaintiff's claim in this suit - Whether plaintiff entitled to
judgment
L'Grande Development Sdn Bhd v. Bukit Cerakah Development Sdn Bhd
(Kang Hwee Gee J) [2007] 8 CLJ
507 [HC]
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Sentence - Juvenile offender - Penal Code, s. 304 - Adequacy - Mitigating factors -
Whether there were extenuating circumstances - Public interest - Whether best served if
offender given custodial sentence
PP v. Wong Wei Choon
(Lau Bee Lan J) [2007] 8 CLJ
536 [HC]
INDEKS PERKARA
PENGKHIDMAT AWAM
Pembuangan - Pembuangan seorang anggota polis - Plaintif mengaku salah ke atas
kedua-dua pertuduhan melakukan kesalahan tatatertib di bawah Jadual 2(7)
Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan
Konstabel) 1970 - Pencabaran keesahan dan kewajaran hukuman tatatertib dikenakan - Sama
ada pertuduhan pertama cacat kerana tidak menepati kehendak peraturan 3(1)
Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan
Konstabel) 1970 - Sama ada pertuduhan kedua tidak berasas dan tidak sah - Sama ada hukuman
buang kerja tidak setimpal dengan kesalahan yang telah dilakukan - Sama ada tindakan
defendan ke atas plaintif berlawanan dengan keadilan asasi - Sama ada kesalahan plaintif
serius dalam perkhidmatan polis - Sama ada mahkamah mempunyai sebab untuk campur tangan
dalam hukuman buang kerja - Sama ada pegawai yang menjalankan kuasa tatatertib jelas
menunjukkan kehendak peraturan dipatuhi - Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan
Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan Konstabel) 1970, s. 6(2)
Osman Hassan lwn. Ketua Polis Negara & Satu Lagi
(Sulaiman Daud H) [2007] 8 CLJ
526 [HC]
POLIS
Tindakan disiplin - Pembuangan - Pembuangan kerja seorang anggota polis - Plaintif
mengaku salah ke atas kedua-dua pertuduhan melakukan kesalahan tatatertib di bawah Jadual
2(7) Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan
Konstabel) 1970 - Pencabaran keesahan dan kewajaran hukuman tatatertib dikenakan - Sama
ada pertuduhan pertama cacat kerana tidak menepati kehendak peraturan 3(1)
Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan
Konstabel) 1970 - Sama ada pertuduhan kedua tidak berasas dan tidak sah - Sama ada hukuman
buang kerja tidak setimpal dengan kesalahan yang telah dilakukan - Sama ada tindakan
defendan ke atas plaintif berlawanan dengan keadilan asasi - Sama ada kesalahan plaintif
serius dalam perkhidmatan polis - Sama ada mahkamah mempunyai sebab untuk campur tangan
dalam hukuman buang kerja - Sama ada pegawai yang menjalankan kuasa tatatertib jelas
menunjukkan kehendak peraturan dipatuhi - Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan
Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan Konstabel) 1970, s. 6(2)
Osman Hassan lwn. Ketua Polis Negara & Satu Lagi
(Sulaiman Daud H) [2007] 8 CLJ
526 [HC]
UNDANG-UNDANG PENTADBIRAN
Pengkhidmat awam - Pembuangan seorang anggota polis - Plaintif mengaku salah ke atas
kedua-dua pertuduhan melakukan kesalahan tatatertib di bawah Jadual 2(7)
Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan
Konstabel) 1970 - Pencabaran keesahan dan kewajaran hukuman tatatertib dikenakan - Sama
ada pertuduhan pertama cacat kerana tidak menepati kehendak peraturan 3(1)
Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan
Konstabel) 1970 - Sama ada pertuduhan kedua tidak berasas dan tidak sah - Sama ada hukuman
buang kerja tidak setimpal dengan kesalahan yang telah dilakukan - Sama ada tindakan
defendan ke atas plaintif berlawanan dengan keadilan asasi - Sama ada kesalahan plaintif
serius dalam perkhidmatan polis - Sama ada mahkamah mempunyai sebab untuk campur tangan
dalam hukuman buang kerja Sama ada pegawai yang menjalankan kuasa tatatertib jelas
menunjukkan kehendak peraturan dipatuhi - Peraturan-Peraturan Polis (Kelakuan dan
Tatatertib) (Pegawai-Pegawai Rendah Polis dan Konstabel) 1970, s. 6(2)
Osman Hassan lwn. Ketua Polis Negara & Satu Lagi
(Sulaiman Daud H) [2007] 8 CLJ
526 [HC]
CASE OF THE WEEK
AU MENG NAM & ANOR v. UNG YAK CHEW & ORS
LAND LAW: Indefeasibility of title and interests - Forged transfer - Whether purchaser acquired indefeasible title - Whether words "to whom it may subsequently be transferred" in s. 340(3)(a) NLC referred to immediate purchaser or subsequent purchaser - Whether Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd v. Boonsom Boonyanit decided per incuriam - Whether binding precedent - Whether distinguished - National Land Code, s. 340(2), (3)CLJ Bulletin
To Subscribe/Unsubscribe go to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 CLJ Legal Network Sdn
Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone:
603-4270-5400 Fax No : 603-4270 5401 & 603-4270 5402