Back to Top


CLJ Logo CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2013, Vol 40
4 October 2013

Print this page
Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Cases Of The Week

a) AZILAH HADRI & ANOR v. PP

b) PP lwn. VBJITHA SUBRAMANIAM [2012] 1 SMC 149

c) JUDICIAL QUOTES

2. Latest Cases

a) Legal Network Series

b) CLJ 2013 Volume 7 (Part 5)

3. Articles

a) Legal Network Series Article

4. Legislation Highlights

a) Principal Acts

b) Amending Acts

c) PU(A)

d) PU(B)


CASES OF THE WEEK

AZILAH HADRI & ANOR v. PP
COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
MOHAMED APANDI ALI JCA; LINTON ALBERT JCA; TENGKU MAIMUN JCA
[CRIMINAL APPEALS NO: B-06A-19-2009 & B-06A-19A-2009]
23 AUGUST 2013

CRIMINAL LAW: Penal Code - Section 302 - Murder - Common intention - Circumstantial evidence - Appellants alleged to have shot deceased and blown her to pieces by using explosives - Whether evidence did not conclusively and irresistibly point to appellants' guilt - Whether prearranged plan not proved or addressed by trial judge - Whether conviction unsafe - Penal Code, ss. 34 & 302

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Trial - Defence - Alibi - Whether to be adequately addressed by trial judge - Proof - Whether accused had no legal burden to prove defence of alibi - Trial judge imputing burden of proof to accused - Whether a serious misdirection

EVIDENCE: Adverse inference - Murder - Failure to call material police witnesses to testify - Whether a withholding of evidence - Whether presumption arose against prosecution - Evidence Act 1950, s. 114(g)

EVIDENCE: Documentary evidence - Computer printout - Admissibility - Failure by trial judge to determine person responsible for management and operation of computer from which exhibits were printed - Evidentiary requirement - Whether fulfilled - Whether exhibit wrongly admitted - Whether a misdirection - Evidence Act 1950, ss. 83 & 90A(2)

EVIDENCE: Information leading to fact discovered - Admissibility of statement - Murder - Information leading to discovery of crime scene and jewellery belonging to deceased - Whether police had prior knowledge of information - Contradictions in statement - Contradictions not addressed by trial judge - Whether a misdirection by way of non-direction - Evidence Act 1950, s. 27

PP lwn. VBJITHA SUBRAMANIAM [2012] 1 SMC 149
MAHKAMAH SESYEN, SEMENYIH
RAMESH GOPALAN HS
[KES NO: 62-2453-2009]
10 APRIL 2009

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Hukuman - Kesetimpalan - Akta Imigresen 1959/63 - Seksyen 15(1)(c) - Warganegara asing - Tinggal lebih masa - Tinggal di Malaysia selama 1 1/2 tahun selepas Pas Lawatan Sosial tamat - Hukuman wajar

JUDICIAL QUOTES

ABDUL GHAFFAR MD AMIN v. IBRAHIM YUSOFF & ANOR [2008] 5 CLJ 1

[1] Issue: Whether r. 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995 permitted an appeal from the Court of Appeal to the Federal Court in a matter that commenced in the Sessions Court:

“As I have stated in Cheng Bee Teik & Ors v. Peter Selvaraj & Anor [2005] 2 CLJ 839 and Noraini Omar & Anor v. Rohani Said & Another Appeal [2006] 1 CLJ 895 that, as far as fatal accident and personal injury claims arising from motor vehicle accidents are concerned, the Court of Appeal stands as the apex court, as such no further appeal shall lie to this court. (See s. 67(1) and s. 96(a) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964.) That is the intention of the legislature and it is incumbent upon this court to give effect to it. When the law states that the decision of the Court of Appeal is final, then the appeal process should stop at the Court of Appeal; it cannot be allowed to come to this court by way of a review process under r. 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995.” – per Arifin Zakaria FCJ in Abdul Ghaffar Md Amin v. Ibrahim Yusoff & Anor [2008] 5 CLJ 1.

For more Judicial Quotes, please login and view under "References" or subscribe to CLJLaw.

LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2011] 1 LNS 50

YEOH LIANG CHUAN v. PERMODALAN NASIONAL BERHAD

CONTRACT: Breach - Employment contract - Claim for salary revision and accompanying benefits - Whether appellant proved he was entitled to the salary revision - Whether appellant was entitled to a 40 % increase in the basic pay under the memo - Whether appellant proved his claim on a balance of probabilities

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appeal from Sessions Court - Appeal to High Court - Whether trial judge erred in her approach and in arriving at her decision - Whether trial judge gave due appreciation to the evidence favourable to appellant - Whether trial judge's findings on the computation of appellant's basic salary ran counter to the evidence adduced - Whether trial judge misdirected herself on the applicable law of no case to answer - Whether approach caused serious miscarriage of justice to appellant - Whether merited appellate intervention by this court

[2011] 1 LNS 816

GABUNGAN PERTIWI SDN BHD v. PEMBINAAN BLT SDN BHD

CONTRACT: Guarantee - Performance guarantee - Demand for payment - Whether Guarantees were 'on-demand' guarantees - If so, whether 'unconscionability' surrounding the demand or of the conduct of the beneficiary was a further exception for intervention by the Court, apart from the established exception of 'fraud' - Whether 'unconscionability' established to restrain defendant from demanding, receiving and/or dealing with proceeds as beneficiary of the Guarantee

[2011] 1 LNS 817

EON BANK BERHAD v. DATUK KERAMAT HOLDINGS BERHAD

COMPANY LAW: Winding up - Petition - Application to strike out winding up petition - Service of statutory demand - Service of petition - Dispute regarding service of both - Whether s. 218 Notice had been left at respondent's registered office - Whether that was the only requirement for presumption that respondent unable to pay its debts to be invoked to ground a petition - Whether petition was properly effected at respondent's registered office - Whether respondent was commercially insolvent as not able to meet its current liabilities

[2011] 1 LNS 818

WLP INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS (M) SDN BHD v. KL-KEPONG RUBBER PRODUCTS SDN BHD

TORT: Defamation - Libel - Libellous letters - Whether alleged defamatory statement was published to a third party - Whether alleged defamatory statements in P37 referred to plaintiff - Whether statements contained in letter were defamatory - Whether any defences available to defendant

TORT: Defamation - Libellous letters - Damages - Exemplary damages - Whether defendant's conduct was calculated to profit himself - Whether any basis for the award of exemplary damages - Aggravated damages - Whether a corporate plaintiff is entitled to aggravated damages - Whether publication of letter affected plaintiff's credibility and integrity in the business community thereby causing plaintiff mental distress

[2011] 1 LNS 840

SEE CHOO @ SEE GUAT KIOK v. JB SECURITIES SDN BHD

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Limitation - Defendant raising defence of time bar against plaintiff's claim - Whether period of limitation could be postponed to begin to run only when plaintiff discovered the fraud or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it - Amendments to the 1999 suit on 21 December 2000 - Whether plaintiff must have had full and complete knowledge of all matters raised in that suit as amended which was identical to the present suit - Whether alleged fraud had already been discovered on 21 December 2000 and time should begin to run from then - Whether writ filed well beyond 6 years after that date and had become time-barred

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Fraud - Whether allegation that defendant had acted wrongfully based on fraud in dealing with all the impugned transactions had been proved - Whether plaintiff discharged evidential burden of proving fraud against defendant beyond reasonable doubt

CLJ 2013 Volume 7 (Part 5)

COURT

FEDERAL COURT

Datuk M Kayveas & Anor v. Bar Council
Arifin Zakaria CJ, Hashim Yusoff, Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Jeffrey Tan FCJJ
(Legal Profession - Misconduct - Acting in a manner unbefitting of an advocate and solicitor) [2013] 7 CLJ 533 [FC]

COURT OF APPEAL

Azilah Hadri & Anor v. PP
Mohamed Apandi Ali, Linton Albert, Tengku Maimun JJCA
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure; Evidence - Murder - Common intention - Circumstantial evidence) [2013] 7 CLJ 577 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Jamal Nasir Zulkipli & Anor v. Ng Sze Tian & Anor
Ravinthran Paramaguru JC
(Tort; Damages - Personal injury or death - Damages - Assessment) [2013] 7 CLJ 625 [HC]

Kamarul Farkaruddin Mohamed lwn. PP
Kamardin Hashim H
(Prosedur Jenayah; Undang-undang Jenayah; Keterangan - Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - Seksyen 15(1)(a) – Kesalahan memasukkan dadah berbahaya ke dalam tubuh badan)[2013] 7 CLJ 636 [HC]

Mohd Khirudin Yaakub v. Superintendant Of Central Prison Kuching & Ors
Rhodzariah Bujang J
(Criminal Procedure; Damages; Tort - Warrant of commitment - False imprisonment) [2013] 7 CLJ 654 [HC]

South East Asia Special Asset Management Bhd v. Foo Shyy Fang & Anor
VT Singham J
(Civil Procedure; Land Law; Bankruptcy - Proof of debt - Filing of - Secured creditor) [2013] 7 CLJ 667 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

BANKRUPTCY

Proof of debt - Filing of - Secured creditor - Whether plaintiff as secured creditor surrendered security to Director General of Insolvency - Whether subject property becomes vested in Director General of Insolvency - Whether a distinction between drawn r. 10 and r. 11 of Sch. C of Bankruptcy Act 1967 - Whether plaintiff entitled to enforce its statutory rights - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 42
South East Asia Special Asset Management Bhd v. Foo Shyy Fang & Anor
(VT Singham J) [2013] 7 CLJ 667 [HC]

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Originating summons - Charge action - Foreclosure proceedings - Application to enforce statutory remedy to recover loan - Proof of debt - Filing of - Whether plaintiff as secured creditor surrendered security to Director General of Insolvency - Whether subject property becomes vested in Director General of Insolvency - Whether a distinction drawn between r. 10 and r. 11 of Sch. C of Bankruptcy Act 1967 - Whether plaintiff entitled to enforce its statutory rights - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 42
South East Asia Special Asset Management Bhd v. Foo Shyy Fang & Anor
(VT Singham J) [2013] 7 CLJ 667 [HC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Penal Code - Section 302 - Murder - Common intention - Circumstantial evidence - Appellants alleged to have shot deceased and blown her to pieces by using explosives - Whether evidence did not conclusively and irresistibly point to appellants' guilt - Whether prearranged plan not proved or addressed by trial judge - Whether conviction unsafe - Penal Code, ss. 34 & 302
Azilah Hadri & Anor v. PP
(Mohamed Apandi Ali, Linton Albert, Tengku Maimun JJCA) [2013] 7 CLJ 577 [CA]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Trial - Defence - Alibi - Whether to be adequately addressed by trial judge - Proof - Whether accused had no legal burden to prove defence of alibi - Trial judge imputing burden of proof to accused - Whether a serious misdirection
Azilah Hadri & Anor v. PP
(Mohamed Apandi Ali, Linton Albert, Tengku Maimun JJCA) [2013] 7 CLJ 577 [CA]

Warrant - Warrant of commitment - Plaintiff sentenced to one year imprisonment and fine of RM10,000 in default six months' imprisonment - Warrant of commitment stated failure to pay fine - Whether fine paid - Plaintiff committed to prison for default of payment - Whether prison warden informed about payment of fine - Whether prison officers justified in taking warrant of commitment at face value without verifying with court
Mohd Khirudin Yaakub v. Superintendant Of Central Prison Kuching & Ors
(Rhodzariah Bujang J) [2013] 7 CLJ 654 [HC]

DAMAGES

Assessment - False imprisonment - Plaintiff's imprisonment of one year extended to another six months - Allegation that extended incarceration caused mental illness - Claim for general, exemplary and aggravated damages - Whether mental illness caused by default sentence or extended incarceration - Whether damages claimable
Mohd Khirudin Yaakub v. Superintendant Of Central Prison Kuching & Ors
(Rhodzariah Bujang J) [2013] 7 CLJ 654 [HC]

Personal Injury or Death - Award - Decision of Sessions Court - Appeal against - General damages and special damages - Whether award of RM170,000 and RM180,000 for paraplegia sufficient - Whether separate award for bladder impairment and erectile dysfunction should be awarded - Nursing care - Whether assessment based on cost of engaging domestic help - Whether claim for renovation to facilitate use of wheelchair should be allowed
Jamal Nasir Zulkipli & Anor v. Ng Sze Tian & Anor
(Ravinthran Paramaguru JC) [2013] 7 CLJ 625 [HC]

EVIDENCE

Adverse inference - Murder - Failure to call material police witnesses to testify - Whether a withholding of evidence - Whether presumption arose against prosecution - Evidence Act 1950, s. 114(g)
Azilah Hadri & Anor v. PP
(Mohamed Apandi Ali, Linton Albert, Tengku Maimun JJCA) [2013] 7 CLJ 577 [CA]

Documentary evidence - Computer printout - Admissibility - Failure by trial judge to determine person responsible for management and operation of computer from which exhibits were printed - Evidentiary requirement - Whether fulfilled - Whether exhibit wrongly admitted - Whether a misdirection - Evidence Act 1950, ss. 83 & 90A(2)
Azilah Hadri & Anor v. PP
(Mohamed Apandi Ali, Linton Albert, Tengku Maimun JJCA) [2013] 7 CLJ 577 [CA]

Information leading to fact discovered - Admissibility of statement - Murder - Information leading to discovery of crime scene and jewellery belonging to deceased - Whether police had prior knowledge of information - Contradictions in statement - Contradictions not addressed by trial judge - Whether a misdirection by way of non-direction - Evidence Act 1950, s. 27
Azilah Hadri & Anor v. PP
(Mohamed Apandi Ali, Linton Albert, Tengku Maimun JJCA) [2013] 7 CLJ 577 [CA]

LAND LAW

Charge - Foreclosure proceedings - Application to enforce statutory remedy to recover loan - Proof of debt - Filing of - Whether plaintiff as secured creditor surrendered security to Director General of Insolvency - Whether subject property becomes vested in Director General of Insolvency - Whether a distinction drawn between r. 10 and r. 11 of Sch. C of Bankruptcy Act 1967 - Whether plaintiff entitled to enforce its statutory rights - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 42
South East Asia Special Asset Management Bhd v. Foo Shyy Fang & Anor
(VT Singham J) [2013] 7 CLJ 667 [HC]

LEGAL PROFESSION

Misconduct - Acting in a manner unbefitting of an advocate and solicitor - Conveyancing transaction - Breach of stakeholder obligation over stakeholder monies - Whether a breach of fiduciary duty - Part of stakeholder monies wrongfully released - Whether constituted a breach of trust - Whether apellants jointly complicit and at fault - Whether there was breach of rules of natural justice at disciplinary hearing - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 94(3)(o)
Datuk M Kayveas & Anor v. Bar Council
(Arifin Zakaria CJ, Hashim Yusoff, Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Jeffrey Tan FCJJ) [2013] 7 CLJ 533 [FC]

TORT

Damages - Assessment - Appellants sustained paraplegic injuries and wheelchair bound for life - Nursing care - Whether based on cost of engaging domestic help - Whether claim for renovation to facilitate use of wheelchair should be allowed
Jamal Nasir Zulkipli & Anor v. Ng Sze Tian & Anor
(Ravinthran Paramaguru JC) [2013] 7 CLJ 625 [HC]

False imprisonment - Unlawful imprisonment - Conviction under s. 11(a) Anti-Corruption Act 1997 - Sentence of one year imprisonment and fine of RM10,000 in default six months' imprisonment - Warrant of commitment stated failure to pay fine - Plaintiff paid fine but committed to prison for default of payment - Whether prison warden informed - Whether there was breach of reg. 24 Prison Regulations 2000 - Whether plaintiff falsely imprisoned - Prisons Act 1967, s. 29
Mohd Khirudin Yaakub v. Superintendant Of Central Prison Kuching & Ors
(Rhodzariah Bujang J) [2013]7 CLJ 654 [HC]

INDEKS PERKARA

KETERANGAN

Terima masuk - Laporan kimia - Laporan ujian pengesanan dadah dalam air kencing - Sama ada disediakan oleh seorang yang berkelayakan di bawah s. 31A Akta Dadah Berbahaya - Sama ada laporan boleh diterima - Kanun Tatacara Jenayah, s. 399
Kamarul Farkaruddin Mohamed lwn. PP
(Kamardin Hashim H) [2013] 7 CLJ 636 [HC]

PROSEDUR JENAYAH

Ekshibit - Pemeriksaan oleh pakar - Laporan ujian pengesanan dadah dalam air kencing - Keputusan menunjukkan kandungan amphetamine dan methamphetamine - Kegagalan menyatakan amphetamine dan methamphetamine adalah dadah berbahaya yang tersenarai dalam Bahagian III dan IV Jadual Pertama Akta Dadah Berbahaya - Sama ada menimbulkan keraguan terhadap kes pendakwaan
Kamarul Farkaruddin Mohamed lwn. PP
(Kamardin Hashim H) [2013] 7 CLJ 636 [HC]

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH

Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - Seksyen 15(1)(a) - Kesalahan memasukkan dadah berbahaya ke dalam tubuh badan - Ujian saringan air kencing didapati positif dadah - Sama ada peruntukan s. 31A(1A) dipatuhi - Sama ada tertuduh ditangkap sebelum memberikan sampel air kencing - Sama ada pegawai sains yang membuat pemeriksaan dan ujian pengesanan dadah berkelayakan - Sama ada kegagalan mematuhi s. 31A(1A) memudaratkan kes pendakwaan - Kanun Tatacara Jenayah, s. 399
Kamarul Farkaruddin Mohamed lwn. PP
(Kamardin Hashim H) [2013] 7 CLJ 636 [HC]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article

1. OBLIGATION OF COMPANIES TO PAY ZAKAT:
    ISSUES ARISING FROM EFFECTS OF SEPARATE LEGAL ENTITY*
[Read excerpt]
    by: TUN ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD** [2013] 1 LNS(A) lxiv

2. ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN THE BRAVE NEW WORLD [Read excerpt]
    by: LORD JUSTICE JACKSON* [2013] 1 LNS(A) lxv

3. AUTOMATION OF CONVEYANCING [Read excerpt]
    by: ELLIOT SIM*

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Repealing
ACT 759 Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 277/2013] - except para(s) 1 to 10 of Schedule 9 and para(s) 13 to 19 of Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 758 Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 276/2013] - except s 129 and Schedule 9 -Nil-
ACT 757 Strata Management Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-
ACT 756 Traditional And Complementary Medicine Act 2013 Not Yet In Force -Nil-
ACT 755 Finance Act 2013 See s 3 for the Income Tax Act; s 41 for the Stamp Act; s 47 for the Petroleum (Income Tax) Act and s 55 for the Real Property Gains Tax Act -Nil-

Amending Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1452 Animals (Amendment) Act 2013 20 August 2013 ACT 647
ACT A1451 Perbadanan Kemajuan Filem Nasional Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 1 April 2013 [PU(B) 89/2013] ACT 244
ACT A1450 Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2013 Not Yet In Force ACT 318
ACT A1449 Industrial Designs (Amendment) Act 2013 1 July 2013 [PU(B) 86/2013] ACT 552
ACT A1448 Central Bank Of Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2013 8 February 2013 [PU(B) 44/2013] ACT 701

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 305/2013 Income Tax (Deduction For Expenditure On Issuance Of Agro Sukuk) Rules 2013 2 October 2013 Year of assessment 2013 until the year of assessment 2015 ACT 53
PU(A) 304/2013 Federal Roads (South Klang Valley Expressway) Order 2013 1 October 2013 1 October 2013 ACT 376
PU(A) 303/2013 Customs (Values) (Palm Kernel) (No. 10) Order 2013 1 October 2013 1 October 2013 to 31 October 2013 ACT 235
PU(A) 302/2013 Customs (Values) (Palm Oil) (No. 10) Order 2013 1 October 2013 1 October 2013 to 31 October 2013 ACT 235
PU(A) 301/2013 Income Tax (Tax Agents Application Fee) Order 2013 30 September 2013 1 October 2013 ACT 53

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 388/2013 Appointment Of The Board Of Visitors For The Jerantut Narcotics Addiction Rehabilitation Centre, Pahang 2 October 2013 1 December 2011 for a period of two years ACT 283
PU(B) 387/2013 Appointment Of The Board Of Visitors For The Jelebu Narcotics Addiction Rehabilitation Centre, Negeri Sembilan 2 October 2013 1 December 2011 for a period of two years ACT 283
PU(B) 386/2013 Appointment Of The Board Of Visitors For The Sungai Ruan Narcotics Addiction Rehabilitation Centre, Pahang) 2 October 2013 1 December 2011 for a period of two years ACT 283
PU(B) 385/2013 Appointment Of The Board Of Visitors For The Butterworth Narcotics Addiction Rehabilitation Centre, Penang 2 October 2013 1 December 2011 for a period of two years ACT 283
PU(B) 384/2013 Appointment Of The Board Of Visitors For The Bukit Mertajam Narcotics Addiction Rehabilitation Centre, Penang 2 October 2013 1 December 2011 for a period of two years ACT 283
[2013] 1 LNS(A) lxiv MALAYSIA

OBLIGATION OF COMPANIES TO PAY ZAKAT:

ISSUES ARISING FROM EFFECTS OF SEPARATE LEGAL ENTITY*

by

TUN ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD**


(Former Chief Justice of Malaysia)

First, let me make it very clear that I am not challenging the ruling of the National Fatwa Committee and the Selangor Fatwa Committee. (For brevity I am using the word “ruling” to cover both the “decision” of the National Fatwa Committee and the “fatwa” of the Selangor Fatwa Committee.) I am merely trying to understand the basis or the rational of the ruling because it involves applying one out of many religious obligations of Muslim human beings to a non-human “separate legal entity” created by law for specific non-religious purpose, which entity is neither and could never be, a “believer” (Muslim) nor a “non-believer” (non-Muslim) in the Islamic sense.

There is no issue that a free, adult, sane Muslim human being is obliged to pay zakat provided the conditions therewith are fulfilled. That has been settled since the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. But, when you extend a religious obligation to a legal entity created by law for specific non-religious purposes, inevitably you will be faced with new issues. I am aware that “Muslim jurists have often said that a legal personality or entity is recognised for such entities as bayt al-mal, the waqf and mosque.”[1] Even if that is so, the question remains, is the effect of such recognition the same as under the prevailing law? Did those scholars treat the bayt al-mal, waqf and mosques as a Muslim human being subject to all the religious obligations of a Muslim human being? How do you harmonize it with the principle of separate legal entity under the prevailing law?


. . .

* Special Address at The Malaysian Legal and Corporate Conference 2013 (MLCC), 3rd -4th July 2013.

** tunabdulhamid@gmail.com , http://www.tunabdulhamid.my


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
[2013] 1 LNS(A) lxv UNITED KINGDOM

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN THE BRAVE NEW WORLD

by

LORD JUSTICE JACKSON*


1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 The text of this lecture is being distributed at the start of tonight’s meeting. The paragraphs of the lecture are numbered for ease of reference during the “Open Forum” later this evening.

1.2 Civil Litigation Costs Review Final Report. The Civil Litigation Costs Review Final Report[1] (“FR”) was published in January 2010. The FR recommendations have been endorsed by the Judicial Executive Board and broadly accepted by the Government.

1.3 Implementation programme. Some FR recommendations require primary legislation. The necessary Bill is now before Parliament. If approved by Parliament, it may come into force in this year or perhaps somewhat later. Other recommendations in the FR require rule changes, rather than primary legislation. It is intended that these rule changes will come into force on the same date as the Act. The rule amendments are currently being drafted, then presented to the Rule Committee for approval and then held in escrow until the “big bang” date. A Judicial Steering Group (“JSG”) chaired by the Master of the Rolls is overseeing implementation on behalf of the judiciary.


. . .

* Speech Eighth Lecture by Lord Justice Jackson In The Implementation Programme, KPMG Forensic’s Leeds Law Lecture 2012. Published with kind permission of the Judicial Communications Office, Judiciary of England and Wales (http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/lcj-speechvulnerable- witnesses-in-admin-of-criminal-justice-29092011.pdf ).


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
NEW ZEALAND

AUTOMATION OF CONVEYANCING

by

ELLIOT SIM*


A veteran player in the automation of conveyancing says that e-dealing would realise its true potential if there was a merger between niche markets.

Richard Galbraith of Fencible Law launched KeyTrack 10 years ago. He introduced it to the market as a tool which would “add value to a conveyancing transaction”.

His cloud-based system communicates with real estate agents, clients and associated parties in real time online and via automated messaging, with details kept in a secure data centre.

Mr Galbraith says each conveyancing product on the market should merge to create a more efficient e-dealing system.

“The market, in terms of the automation of conveyancing, has become incredibly complex, actually, because there [are] quite a few players all with their niche package.”


. . .

* Published with kind permission of Law Talk, Law Society of New Zealand.


x