Back to Top


  CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2014, Vol 40
03 October 2014



Print this page
Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Cases(s) Of The Week

a) MOHD AFANDI ABU BAKAR lwn. PP

2. Latest Cases

a) Legal Network Series

b) CLJ 2014 Volume 7 (Part 8)

3. Articles

a) Legal Network Series Article(s)

4. Legislation Highlights

a) Principal Acts

b) Amending Acts

c) PU(A)

d) PU(B)


CASES(S) OF THE WEEK

MOHD AFANDI ABU BAKAR lwn. PP
MAHKAMAH RAYUAN, PUTRAJAYA
AZAHAR MOHAMED HMR, ROHANA YUSUF HMR, ZAKARIA SAM HMR
[RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: D-05-342-2010]
20 JUN 2014

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH: Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - Seksyen 39B(1)(c) - Kesalahan persediaan bagi tujuan mengedar dadah - Sama ada hakim bicara terkhilaf apabila mensabitkan perayu dengan pertuduhan 'mengedar' - Sama ada hakim bicara gagal mengarahkan diri kepada intipati `persediaan' - Sama ada satu salah arahan serius - Sama ada selamat untuk mengesahkan sabitan dan hukuman - Sama ada terdapat `exceptional circumstances' untuk mewajarkan penggunaan proviso s. 60(1) Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 - Keterangan mencukupi untuk membuktikan perayu mempunyai milikan atas dadah - Sama ada pertuduhan dipinda kepada pertuduhan di bawah s. 12(2) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Rayuan - Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman - Kesalahan persediaan bagi tujuan mengedar dadah - Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952, s. 39B(1)(c) - Sama ada hakim bicara terkhilaf apabila mensabitkan perayu dengan pertuduhan `mengedar' - Sama ada hakim bicara gagal mengarahkan diri kepada intipati 'persediaan' - Sama ada satu salah arahan serius - Sama ada selamat untuk mengesahkan sabitan dan hukuman - Sama ada terdapat `exceptional circumstances' untuk mewajarkan penggunaan proviso s. 60(1) Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 - Keterangan mencukupi untuk membuktikan perayu mempunyai milikan atas dadah - Sama ada pertuduhan dipinda kepada pertuduhan di bawah s. 12(2) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952

LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2013] 1 LNS 439 BADRUL HISHAM SHAHRIN lwn. PR & KES YANG LAIN PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Bidang kuasa mahkamah - Ultra vires - Perintah untuk menyekat perhimpunan aman dibawah seksyen 98 Kanun Tatacara Jenayah 1999 - Sama ada perintah yang telah diputuskan bertentangan dengan Akta Perhimpunan Aman 2012 dan Perlembagaan Persekutuan - Sama ada perintah yang dikeluarkan berkenaan perhimpunan aman dibawah seksyen 98 Kanun Tatacara Jenayah 1999 sah
UNDANG-UNDANG PERLEMBAGAAN: Kebebasan asasi - Kebebasan berhimpun - Hak untuk mengadakan perhimpunan - Sama ada hak untuk mengadakan perhimpunan yang diberikan di bawah Akta Perhimpunan Awam 2012 bersifat mutlak - Sama ada hak untuk mengadakan perhimpunan tertakluk kepada had-had dan sekatan-sekatan di bawah Perlembagaan Persekutuan
[2013] 1 LNS 595 KAMALAN SELVATHAMBY lwn. VEJILETCHUMI ARUMUGAM & SATU LAGI UNDANG-UNDANG SYARIKAT: Mesyuarat - Pemanggilan mesyuarat - Kuasa mahkamah untuk memberi arahan untuk mengadakan mesyuarat - Campur tangan mahkamah - Sama ada tataurusan syarikat praktikal untuk dilaksanakan dalam keadaan biasa - Sama ada mahkamah wajar campur tangan dalam urusan pentadbiran syarikat dalam memanggil sesuatu mesyuarat diadakan - Akta Syarikat 1965, s. 150
PROSEDUR SIVIL: Kaedah pemulaan - Saman Pemula - Pembatalan - Sama ada proses pemulaan yang betul telah digunakan - Sama ada permohonan plaintif melalui saman pemula sesuai untuk memutuskan pertikaian pihak-pihak - Sama ada terdapat isu-isu untuk dibicarakan secara tindakan writ
[2013] 1 LNS 1046 PP v. ESWARAN SUSOP & OTHER CASE EVIDENCE: Exhibits - Break in chain of evidence - Doubt in the register of exhibits - Exhibits kept in 2 boxes and sealed - Whether any possibility of exhibits being accessed and tampered by anyone - Whether infirmity in the register resulted in the break in the chain of evidence of the exhibits and/or change in the identity and/or any tampering of exhibits
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Trial - Dangerous Drugs Acts 1952 - Chemist report - No evidence adduced as to weighing equipment used by Chemist and whether weighing equipment was properly calibrated before it was used - Whether accuracy of the weight of the drugs as testified by the Chemist in doubt - Whether benefit of the doubt must be resolved in favour of accused - Whether PP allowed to invoke the presumption under s. 37(da) (xvi) of the DDA 1952 on the weight of the drugs to prove the charge of trafficking - Whether charge of trafficking could be sustained
CRIMINAL LAW: Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - ss. 2, 39B - Trafficking in dangerous drugs - Transporting - Carrying - Whether must be shown to have been conducted from one place to another - Whether mere fact of carrying incriminating exhibit at that point of time or mere presence of the incriminating exhibits in a vehicle or aircraft or ship, could constitute trafficking - Direct evidence of trafficking by "carrying" from Johor Bahru to Kota Kinabalu - Whether weight of the drug necessary requirement as the presumption under s. 37(da) DDA was not invoked by the PP - Whether PP had proved a prima facie case against both accused under charge of trafficking of methamphetamine
[2013] 1 LNS 1116 KHAIRUL FAIZI KHALID ABBAS & ORS v. KHAIRUL EFFENDI KHAIRUL AMALI & ANOR TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES: Trusts - Existence of - Shares of company - Whether registered shares of the Administrators of the estate of the deceased in the Mining Lease were held in trust for plaintiffs - D2 was the special vehicle set up to apply for a renewal of the Mining Lease - Mining Lease issued to D2 some 14 years later - D1 took over the management of D2, being made a Director on the deceased's death - Whether D1 held the shares in D2 in trust for plaintiffs in accordance with the terms of the Trust evidenced in the Memorandum of Agreement - Whether the trust in the Mining Lease evaporated with its expiry in 1994 - Whether it re-emerged with the granting of the renewed Mining Lease
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Limitation of action - Trustee - Whether plaintiffs' action barred by limitation - Plaintiffs' action brought after 6 years from the date of the Memorandum of Agreement – Whether s. 6 of the Limitation Act 1953 was expressly subject to s. 22
[2014] 1 LNS 189 YEW FOO CHUN v. WONG NYE KEONG & ORS LAND LAW: Title - Original Issue Document of Title (IDT) with plaintiff and never surrendered for cancellation to Registrar of Land Titles - Computerised IDT issued in the right name but delivered to wrong person - Whether Computerized IDT was invalid for non-compliance with the 14th Schedule of the National Land Code 1965 - Whether D8 issuing the Computerized Printed IDT in the name of the correct registered owner was ultra vires - Whether Computerized Printed IDT invalid until the Manual IDT was surrendered, cancelled and destroyed - Whether D8 was negligent and D11 and D12 as well under the concept of vicarious liability
TORT: Negligence - Duty of care - Whether D8, D11 and D12 owed plaintiff a duty of care - Whether foreseeable that plaintiff's ownership, rights and interest in Land would be affected or defeated if the Computer Printed IDT was issued in contravention of the 14th Schedule National Land Code and without confirming if the Manual IDT had been surrendered for cancellation - Whether D8, D11 and D12 liable in negligence towards plaintiff as registered owner for all losses arising out of the breach of their duty of care and statutory duty toward her
LAND LAW: Indefeasibility of title and interests - Conclusiveness of register -Whether the indefeasibility of title under the Torrens system in ss. 89 and 340 of the National Land Code (NLC) trumped the provision of 14th Schedule of the NLC- Whether the provision under the 14th Schedule out ranked the security of title - Whether conclusiveness of the register document of title extended to the Manual IDT as well as the Computerized IDT - Whether the computerized IDT was a valid IDT even if some procedural requirements for its issuance had not been complied with
LAND LAW: Indefeasibility of title and interests - Fraud - Whether D1 and D2 were parties to the fraud and forgery of the instrument of transfer in the First Transfer from plaintiff to D1 and D2 - Whether plaintiff's signatures were forged with the intention to carry out the sale and purchase transactions - Whether D1 and D2's title was defeasible pursuant to s. 340(2)(a) and (b) of the NLC - Whether D5 and D6 were bona fide purchasers when they bought the Land from D1 and D2 - Whether the financier D13 was a bona fide chargee - Whether title of D5 and D6 was indefeasible under deferred indefeasibility in the proviso to s. 340(3) of the NLC - Whether D13's interest in the Charge was indefeasible
TORT: Conspiracy - Conspiracy to defraud - Sale of land - D4, a legal assistant with D10 attested signature of D1 and D2 in the sale and purchase and Form 14A in which signature of plaintiff had been forged - Whether D4 was liable in fraud or a conspiracy to defraud plaintiff - Whether D10 as solicitors for the purchasers D1 and D2 were liable for fraud or a conspiracy to defraud plaintiff of her Land

CLJ 2014 Volume 7 (Part 8)

COURT

SC India

MAA Binda Express Carrier And Another v. North-East Frontier Railway And Others
TS Thakur, Vikramajit Sen JJ
(Contract - Government contracts/Tenders - Tender process - Scope of authority) [2014] 7 CLJ 997 [SC India]

COURT OF APPEAL

Bandar Nusajaya Development Sdn Bhd v. Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Alizatul Khair Osman, Rohana Yusuf, Tengku Maimun JJCA
(Civil Procedure - Judicial review - Certiorari) [2014] 7 CLJ 1006 [CA]

Mohd Afandi Abu Bakar lwn. PP
Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf Zakaria Sam HHMR
(Undang-undang Jenayah; Prosedur Jenayah - Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - Seksyen 39B(1)(c) - Kesalahan persediaan bagi tujuan mengedar dadah) [2014] 7 CLJ 1017 [CA]

Sayat Ahmad Nazir Ahmad v. PP
Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Trafficking - Negotiations between accused and agent provocateur for sale and purchase of drugs) [2014] 7 CLJ 1025 [CA]

Teoh Meng Kee v. PP
Mohamad Ariff Yusof, Mah Weng Kwai, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA
(Criminal Procedure; Evidence - Inquest - Coroner's inquiry of death) [2014] 7 CLJ 1034 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Malaysia Land Properties Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Simesilk Sdn Bhd
Nallini Pathmanathan J
(Contract; Civil Procedure - Service contract - Services rendered, claim for) [2014] 7 CLJ 1117 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Certiorari - Appeal against decision of High Court in granting certiorari - Respondent proposed to erect transmission towers and cables - Project involved entering into appellant's lands - Assessment by land administrator - Appellant aggrieved by assessment made on land by land administrator and appealed to State Authority - State Authority increased land administrator's assessment - Respondent appealed to Chief Minister against State Authority's decision in increasing assessment - Whether appeal to Chief Minister provided under law - Application by respondent to quash State Authority's decision in High Court - Whether State Authority's decision final - Electricity Supply Act 1990, s. 16(2)
Bandar Nusajaya Development Sdn Bhd v. Tenaga Nasional Berhad
(Alizatul Khair Osman, Rohana Yusuf, Tengku Maimun JJCA) [2014] 7 CLJ 1006 [CA]

Judicial review - Certiorari - Appeal against granting of certiorari - Respondent proposed to erect transmission towers and cables - Project involved entering into appellant's lands - Assessment by land administrator - Appellant aggrieved by assessment made on land by land administrator and appealed to State Authority - State Authority increased land administrator's assessment - Respondent appealed to Chief Minister against State Authority's decision in increasing assessment - Whether appeal to Chief Minister provided under law - Application by respondent to quash State Authority's decision in High Court - Whether State Authority's decision final - Electricity Supply Act 1990, s. 16(2)
Bandar Nusajaya Development Sdn Bhd v. Tenaga Nasional Berhad
(Alizatul Khair Osman, Rohana Yusuf, Tengku Maimun JJCA) [2014] 7 CLJ 1006 [CA]

Appeal - Memorandum of appeal - Whether owner of condominium unit's complaints expressly pleaded in memorandum of appeal - Whether developer and property management agent had opportunity to rebut allegations - Objection to admissibility of evidence by owner of condominium unit - Whether too late to object - Whether Sessions Court Judge erred in dismissing claim
Malaysia Land Properties Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Simesilk Sdn Bhd
(Nallini Pathmanathan J) [2014] 7 CLJ 1117 [HC]

CONTRACT

Government Contracts/Tenders - Auction/Bidding/Tender Process/Rejection of Bid/Tender - Tender process - Cancellation/discharge of tender process, after submission of bids/tenders, in response to deficiency in tender process - Scope of powers of Government/Competent authority - Scope of judicial review thereof - Held, submission of a bid/tender in response to a notice inviting tenders is only an offer which State or its agencies are under no obligation to accept - Bidders participating in the tender process cannot insist that their bids/tenders should be accepted simply because a bid is the highest or lowest - All that participating bidders are entitled to is a fair, equal and non discriminatory treatment in evaluation of their bids/tenders - Hence, decision to cancel the tender process was in no way discriminatory or mala fide nor violated any fundamental right of appellants so as to warrant any interference by Court - Hence, appeal dismissed with costs assessed at Rs 25,000 - Constitution of India, Arts. 14, 298, 299, 226 and 136
MAA Binda Express Carrier And Another v. North-East Frontier Railway And Others
(TS Thakur, Vikramajit Sen JJ) [2014] 7 CLJ 997 [SC India]

Government Contracts/Tenders - Auction/Bidding/Tender Process/ Rejection of Bid/Tender - Tender process - Rights of participating bidders - Contractual transactions of Government - Norms for - Held, in award of contracts Government and its agencies have to act reasonably and fairly at all points of time - To that extent the tenderer has an enforceable right in the court which is competent to examine whether the aggrieved party has been treated unfairly or discriminated against - Constitution of India, Arts. 14, 298, 299, 226 and 136
MAA Binda Express Carrier And Another v. North-East Frontier Railway And Others
(TS Thakur, Vikramajit Sen JJ) [2014] 7 CLJ 997 [SC India]

Service contract - Services rendered, claim for - Second appellant ('property management agent') provided services for service and maintenance of building pursuant to agreement by developer - Whether property management agent carried out works as property manager pursuant to s. 2 of Valuers, Appraisers Estate Agents Act 1981 ('VAEA') - Whether property management agent had to be registered under s. 21 VAEA prior to undertaking scope of work on behalf of developer - Whether Strata Titles Act 1981 afforded provision for developers to appoint property management agents to collect service charges on its behalf - Whether property management agent performed obligations as contracted - Whether billing should be based on 'unit basis' - Whether property management agent entitled for payments
Malaysia Land Properties Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Simesilk Sdn Bhd
(Nallini Pathmanathan J) [2014] 7 CLJ 1117 [HC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking - Evidence of negotiations between accused and agent provocateur for sale and purchase of drugs - Whether there was direct evidence of trafficking under s. 2 Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Whether act of trafficking clear and unrebutted - Trial judge's failure to state relevant provision of law when convicting appellant - Whether fatal and prejudicial to appellant - Whether there was misdirection by trial judge - Whether appellant failed to raise any reasonable doubt on prosecution's case
Sayat Ahmad Nazir Ahmad v. PP
(Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 7 CLJ 1025 [CA]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Trafficking - Evidence of negotiations between accused and agent provocateur for sale and purchase of drugs - Whether there was direct evidence of trafficking under s. 2 Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Whether act of trafficking clear and unrebutted - Trial judge's failure to state relevant provision of law when convicting appellant - Whether fatal and prejudicial to appellant - Whether there was misdirection by trial judge - Whether appellant failed to raise any reasonable doubt on the prosecution's case - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, s. 39B(1)(a)
Sayat Ahmad Nazir Ahmad v. PP
(Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 7 CLJ 1025 [CA]

Revision - Coroner's inquiry - Application to revise Magistrate's ruling made at Coroner's inquest - Whether Magistrate erred in returning an open verdict - Whether verdict a lawful verdict - Standard of proof in inquiry of death - Whether civil standard of balance of probabilities - Custodial death - Evidence pointing to verdict of homicide - Whether proper verdict was death caused by person or persons unknown - Criminal Procedure Code, s. 328
Teoh Meng Kee v. PP
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof, Mah Weng Kwai, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 7 CLJ 1034 [CA]

EVIDENCE

Inquest - Coroner's inquiry of death - Standard of proof - Whether beyond reasonable doubt or on balance of probabilities - Briginshaw sliding principles - Whether to be applied
Teoh Meng Kee v. PP
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof, Mah Weng Kwai, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JJCA) [2014] 7 CLJ 1034 [CA]

INDEKS PERKARA

PROSEDUR JENAYAH

Rayuan - Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman - Kesalahan persediaan bagi tujuan mengedar dadah - Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952, s. 39B(1)(c) - Sama ada hakim bicara terkhilaf apabila mensabitkan perayu dengan pertuduhan 'mengedar' - Sama ada hakim bicara gagal mengarahkan diri kepada intipati 'persediaan' - Sama ada satu salah arahan serius - Sama ada selamat untuk mengesahkan sabitan dan hukuman - Sama ada terdapat 'exceptional circumstances' untuk mewajarkan penggunaan proviso s. 60(1) Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 - Keterangan mencukupi untuk membuktikan perayu mempunyai milikan atas dadah - Sama ada pertuduhan dipinda kepada pertuduhan di bawah s. 12(2) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952
Mohd Afandi Abu Bakar lwn. PP
(Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Zakaria Sam HHMR) [2014] 7 CLJ 1017 [CA]

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH

Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 - Seksyen 39B(1)(c) - Kesalahan persediaan bagi tujuan mengedar dadah - Sama ada hakim bicara terkhilaf apabila mensabitkan perayu dengan pertuduhan 'mengedar' - Sama ada hakim bicara gagal mengarahkan diri kepada intipati 'persediaan' - Sama ada satu salah arahan serius - Sama ada selamat untuk mengesahkan sabitan dan hukuman - Sama ada terdapat 'exceptional circumstances' untuk mewajarkan penggunaan proviso s. 60(1) Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 - Keterangan mencukupi untuk membuktikan perayu mempunyai milikan atas dadah - Sama ada pertuduhan dipinda kepada pertuduhan di bawah s. 12(2) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952
Mohd Afandi Abu Bakar lwn. PP
(Azahar Mohamed, Rohana Yusuf, Zakaria Sam HHMR) [2014] 7 CLJ 1017 [CA]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article(s)

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Repealing
ACT 763 Yayasan Guru Tun Hussein Onn Act 2014 Not Yet In Force -Nil-
AKTA 762 Akta Cukai Barang Dan Perkhidmatan 2014 1 Julai 2014 - Bahagian I, II, IV, VI dan XVI, ss 10, 11, 17, 18, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 44, 50, 56, 59, 61, 64, 65, 69, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 160, 163, 183, 184 dan 197, Jadual Pertama dan Jadual Kedua Akta mula berkuat kuasa; 1 April 2015 - Bahagian IX, XIII, XVII and XVIII, ss 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51, 52, 53, 57, 58, 60, 62, 63, 66, 67, 68, 70, 84, 88, 89, 90, 91, 94, 98, 106, 108, 109, 110, 122, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 161, 162, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195 dan 196, Jadual Ketiga dan Jadual Keempat Akta mula berkuat kuasa [PU(B) 319/2014] -Nil-
ACT 761 Finance Act 2014 See s 3 for the Income Tax Act; s 33 for the Stamp Act; s 36 for the Petroleum (Income Tax) Act; s 44 for the Real Property Gains Tax Act and s 50 for the Labuan Business Activity Tax Act -Nil-
ACT 760 Fees (Department Of Museums Malaysia) (Validation) Act 2014 1 January 1991 to 11 June 2012 -Nil-
ACT 759 Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 30 June 2013 [PU(B) 277/2013] - except para(s) 1 to 10 of Schedule 9 and para(s) 13 to 19 of Schedule 9 -Nil-

Amending Acts

Number Title Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1468 Promotion Of Investments (Amendment) Act 2014 See section 1(1) to 1(33) of the Act ACT 327
ACT A1467 Anti-Money Laundering And Anti-Terrorism Financing (Amendment) Act 2014 8 August 2014 - s 78 only; 1 September 2014 except ss 22 and 26 - 1 October 2014 [PU(B) 400/2014] ACT 613
ACT A1466 Supplementary Supply (2014) Act 2014 25 July 2014 -Nil-
ACT A1465 Private Higher Educational Institutions (Amendment) Act 2014 25 July 2014 ACT 555
ACT A1464 Price Control And Anti-Profiteering (Amendment) Act 2014 1 September 2014 [PU(B) 399/2014] ACT 723

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 266/2014 Customs Duties (Goods Under Agreement On Comprehensive Economic Partnership Among Member States Of The Asean And Japan) (Amendment) Order 2014 1 October 2014 1 October 2014 PU(A) 476/2008
PU(A) 265/2014 Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing And Proceeds Of Unlawful Activities (Cash And Bearer Negotiable Instruments Declaration) Order 2014 30 September 2014 1 October 2014 ACT 613
PU(A) 264/2014 Customs (Prohibition Of Imports) (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2014 26 September 2014 30 September 2014 PU(A) 490/2012
PU(A) 263/2014 Constitution Of The High Courts (Judicial Commissioner) (No. 5) Order 2014 25 September 2014 6 August 2014 ACT 000
PU(A) 262/2014 Federal Roads (West Malaysia) (Amendment) (No. 8) Order 2014 22 September 2014 23 September 2014 PU(A) 401/1989

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication Date coming into force Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 433/2014 Notification Of Values Of Crude Petroleum Oil Under Section 12 2 October 2014 2 October 2014 to 15 October 2014 ACT 235; PU(A) 275/2012
PU(B) 432/2014 Appointment Of Director General Of The Board 1 October 2014 1 June 2014 ACT 105
PU(B) 431/2014 Notification Of Values Of Crude Palm Oil Under Section 12 1 October 2014 1 October 2014 to 31 October 2014 ACT 235; PU(A) 275/2012
PU(B) 430/2014 Notification Of Values Of Palm Kernel Under Section 12 1 October 2014 1 October 2014 to 31 October 2014 ACT 235; PU(A) 275/2012
PU(B) 429/2014 Results Of Contested Election And Statement Of The Poll After The Official Addition Of Votes For The By-Election Of N. 01 Pengkalan Kubor 30 September 2014 25 September 2014 PU(A) 386/1981
[2014] 1 LNS(A) ci AUSTRALIA

RISK MANAGEMENT: A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE*

by

PETER DRIESSEN**


Sometimes the facts of a matter can put the practitioner in a difficult position. Care is required to ensure that the client's rights are protected and any compensation action is brought within the limitation period.

A retired couple travelling from interstate met with misfortune on Canberra's roads. As they approached a "T" intersection, another vehicle came out of the dark to their left, travelling at high speed and without lights, and collided with them. It immediately left the scene. The couple were taken by ambulance to Canberra Hospital having suffered extensive injuries.

The police believed they identified the other vehicle but were unable to physically inspect it. A police report was prepared.

The solicitor instructed by the couple obtained only a redacted report from the police, made under an FOI request, but was able to identify the registration of the vehicle. An investigation indicated that the likely driver on the evening of the accident was a disqualified driver - someone who managed both to avoid police detection for some time after the accident, and who had disposed of the vehicle before it could be located and inspected. An anonymous witness testified to seeing the vehicle in question being towed just after the accident date. Nevertheless, the police investigation did not and could not provide conclusive evidence of the vehicle and the driver.


. . .

* Published with kind permission of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory. See Ethos No. 232 June 2014.

** General Counsel, Lawcover


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
[2014] 1 LNS(A) xcvi UNITED STATES

EARLY MARRIAGE AS A VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT IN NON-WESTERN COMMUNITIES*

by

JUDY HALE REED**


Although most countries have instituted minimum age laws for marriage, so that legal marriage can only occur after an age set by law, early marriage is still practiced for tradition, control, security, and other reasons. In other words, the phenomenon of early marriage is not unusual, but has become more of an issue in the modern era. In the first place, this article sets out to assess the harms of early marriage by using legal anthropology and critical feminist intersectional theory as its theoretical lenses. Moreover, in light of international law, early marriage is a clear violation of universal human rights norms. There is an urgent need to develop a viable approach to reconciling the tensions between the preservation of the right of communities to social and cultural autonomy on the one hand, and the protection of individual human rights on the other. By using the incidence of early marriage in Romanian Roma, or "Gypsy," communities as a case study, this article proposes respectful, culturally competent ways to reduce early marriage by engaging communities.

Note. The author lived and worked in the Republic of Moldova for a total of six years between 1999-2009, including two years as the Anti-Trafficking and Gender Adviser for the OSCE Mission to Moldova. This article grew out of a paper for Professor Susan Hascall's Emerging Legal Systems course at Duquesne University, and has benefitted from Professor Hascall's comments.


. . .

* Published with kind permission of The Institute for Migrant Rights, Indonesia

** Duquesne University School of Law, E-mail: judy.hale.reed@gmail.com


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
[2014] 1 LNS(A) lix INDONESIA

HOW SERIOUS IS TAX EVASION?: AN EMPIRICAL LEGAL ANSWER*

by

ROBERT W MCGEE**, WENDY GELMAN***, THOMAS J. TARANGELO****


Tax evasion has persistently carried severe penalties, although its intended deterrence effect is highly doubtful. We can safely say that it is based on the widely shared assumption among government officials that tax evasion is among the more serious crimes. In other words, the rationale of the current approach is that the punishment should fit the crime. By taking this into account, this empirical work sets out to expand on previous studies by examining the relative seriousness of 75 crimes and analyzing some demographic variables, including gender, age, marital status, religion and others, to determine whether tax evasion is as serious a crime as some policy makers believe it to be, and to determine whether opinions differ based on demographics. The study finding shows that tax evasion is deemed to be less serious than the average crime. The article concludes that since tax evasion was deemed to be less serious than most other offenses, one might reasonably conclude that the punishment for tax evasion should be less than the punishment for most other offenses.

Keywords: Empirical Legal Studies, Tax Laws, Law and Morality, Crime and Punishments, Criminal Legal Theories, Jurisprudence, Legal Theories.


. . .

* Published with kind permission of The Institute for Migrant Rights, Indonesia.

** Fayetteville State University

*** Florida International University School of Accounting

**** Florida International University School of Accounting


Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
x