CLJ Bulletin, Vol 2006, Issue 43
15 December 2006
CLJ Law MALAYSIA
Print this page![]() |
Introduction:
To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription
Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
New This Week - | 1. CLJ December (Part 1) 2006 |
2. CLJ Supp December (Part 1) 2006 |
COURT
FEDERAL COURT
Kumaran Suppiah v. Dato' Noh Hj Omar & Anor
(Detention under s. 4(1) Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance
1969) [2006]
4 CLJ 675
Muhammad Jailani Kasim v. Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors
(Irregularities in making of detention order - Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive
Measures) Act 1985, ss. 5, 6(1)) [2006] 4 CLJ
687
Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors v. Ong Beng Chuan
(Detention order - Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) (Advisory Board
Procedure) Rules 1987, r. 3) [2006] 4 CLJ
703
COURT OF APPEAL
Tan Kah Khiam v. Liew Chin Chuan & Anor
(Trial - Procedure - Application by plaintiff to reopen case) [2006] 4 CLJ
715
HIGH COURT
CM Indah Sdn Bhd v. UB Ushabina Sdn Bhd
(Claim by plaintiff for sum due and owing by defendant for completion of subcontract
works) [2006]
4 CLJ 733
Gao Yi v. PP
(Appeal against sentence - Immigration Regulations 1963, reg. 39(b)) [2006] 4 CLJ
744
Ramu Kuppusamy lwn. Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Yang Lain
(Habeas corpus - Kaedah-kaedah Ketenteraman Awam dan Mencegah Jenayah (Acara) 1972, k.
6) [2006]
4 CLJ 752
SUBJECT INDEX
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Summary judgment - Contract - Lump sum contract - Claim by plaintiff for sum due and
owing by defendant for completion of subcontract works - Triable issues - Rules of the
High Court 1980, O. 14
CM Indah Sdn Bhd v. UB Ushabina Sdn Bhd
(Low Hop Bing J) [2006] 4 CLJ
733 [HC]
Trial - Procedure - Application by plaintiff to reopen case - Criteria to be satisfied
- Exercise of discretion by trial judge - Whether a reasonable tribunal would have
proceeded to deal with plaintiff's application before defendants began defence - Interests
of justice - Whether interference by appellate court warranted - Whether plaintiff
suffered procedural injustice
Tan Kah Khiam v. Liew Chin Chuan & Anor
(Gopal Sri Ram, Hashim Yusoff & Azmel Maamor JJCA) [2006] 4 CLJ
715 [CA]
CONTRACT
Building contract - Lump sum contract - Claim by plaintiff for sum due and owing by
defendant for completion of subcontract works - Summary judgment - Whether there were
triable issues - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 14
CM Indah Sdn Bhd v. UB Ushabina Sdn Bhd
(Low Hop Bing J) [2006] 4 CLJ
733 [HC]
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Habeas corpus - Preventive detention - Irregularities in making of detention order -
Whether any statutory pre-condition to making or leading to making of detention order
could not be inquired into - Whether non-compliance of such requirements constituted a
breach - Whether subject to judicial review - Whether detention order had not been validly
made - Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985, ss. 5, 6(1)
Muhammad Jailani Kasim v. Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors
(Ahmad Fairuz CJ, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff & Augustine Paul FCJJ) [2006] 4 CLJ
687 [FC]
Habeas corpus - Preventive detention - Reliance by detainee on r. 3 Dangerous Drugs
(Special Preventive Measures) (Advisory Board Procedure) Rules 1987 - Whether officer who
carried out duties under r. 3(2), (3) and (4) Officer in Charge as specified in said rules
- Whether officer lawfully exercising functions of that office - Whether there was breach
of requirements of r. 3(2), (3) and (4) - Whether breach invalidates act of detention -
Whether breach subject to judicial review
Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors v. Ong Beng Chuan
(Ahmad Fairuz CJ, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff & Augustine Paul FCJJ) [2006] 4 CLJ
703 [FC]
Habeas corpus - Preventive detention - Detention under Emergency (Public Order and
Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 - Whether detention order made under s. 4(1) Ordinance
could be made to take effect on a date subsequent to date on which it was made - Whether
amounted to a breach - Whether subject to judicial review - Validity of detention order
Kumaran Suppiah v. Dato' Noh Hj Omar & Anor
(Ahmad Fairuz CJ, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff & Augustine Paul FCJJ) [2006] 4 CLJ
675 [FC]
Sentence - Appeal against sentence - Appellant sentenced to three months' imprisonment
for an offence under reg. 39(b) Immigration Regulations 1963 - Plea of guilt - Whether
trial judge erred in imposing an imprisonment sentence instead of a fine - Whether
custodial sentence imposed manifestly harsh and excessive - Whether trial judge failed to
consider appellant's plea of mitigation - Public interest - First offender
Gao Yi v. PP
(Lau Bee Lan J) [2006] 4 CLJ
744 [HC]
PREVENTIVE DETENTION
Detention order - Application for habeas corpus - Irregularities in making of detention
order - Whether any statutory pre-condition to making or leading to making of detention
order could not be inquired into - Whether non-compliance of such requirements constituted
a breach - Whether subject to judicial review - Whether detention order had not been
validly made - Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985, ss. 5, 6(1)
Muhammad Jailani Kasim v. Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors
(Ahmad Fairuz CJ, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff & Augustine Paul FCJJ) [2006] 4 CLJ
687 [FC]
Detention order - Application for habeas corpus - Reliance by detainee on r. 3
Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) (Advisory Board Procedure) Rules 1987 -
Whether officer who carried out duties under r. 3(2), (3) and (4) Officer in Charge as
specified in said rules - Whether officer lawfully exercising functions of that office -
Whether there was breach of requirements of r. 3(2), (3) and (4) - Whether breach
invalidates act of detention - Whether breach subject to judicial review
Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Ors v. Ong Beng Chuan
(Ahmad Fairuz CJ, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff & Augustine Paul FCJJ) [2006] 4 CLJ
703 [FC]
Detention order - Detention under Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime)
Ordinance 1969 - Application for habeas corpus - Whether detention order made under s.
4(1) Ordinance could be made to take effect on a date subsequent to date on which it was
made - Whether amounted to a breach - Whether subject to judicial review - Validity of
detention order
Kumaran Suppiah v. Dato' Noh Hj Omar & Anor
(Ahmad Fairuz CJ, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff & Augustine Paul FCJJ) [2006] 4 CLJ
675 [FC]
TORT
Defamation - Libel - Claim by plaintiff for damages - Whether words "tea
money" in article published in Chinese language capable of bearing a defamatory
meaning - Whether there was sufficient proof that those words had been attributed to
plaintiff
Tan Kah Khiam v. Liew Chin Chuan & Anor
(Gopal Sri Ram, Hashim Yusoff & Azmel Maamor JJCA) [2006] 4 CLJ
715 [CA]
INDEKS PERKARA
TAHANAN PENCEGAHAN
Tahanan - Permohonan untuk habeas corpus - Sama ada tahanan pemohon tidak sah dan
terbatal - Ketidakpatuhan atau pelanggaran k. 6 Kaedah-kaedah Ketenteraman Awam dan
Mencegah Jenayah (Acara) 1972 - Sama ada k. 6 merupakan peruntukan statut yang mandatory -
Keterangan afidavit - Sama ada pemohon telah dinafikan haknya untuk diwakili oleh seorang
peguam - Sama ada writ habeas corpus patut dikeluarkan terhadap pemohon
Ramu Kuppusamy lwn. Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Malaysia & Yang Lain
(Azahar Mohamed PK) [2006] 4 CLJ
752 [HC]
2. CLJ Supp December (Part 1) 2006
COURT
HIGH COURT
Loy Teck Chye v. Antah Sedgwick Chartered Insurance Brokers Sdn Bhd
(Contract - Agreement - Construction of terms) [2006] 7 CLJ
485
Mary Pushpam Savarimuthu v. Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial
(Administrative law - Exercise of judicial functions) [2006] 7 CLJ
511
Meiden Electric Engineering Sdn Bhd lwn. Mtrans Holdings Sdn Bhd
(Prosedur sivil - Penghakiman terus - Rayuan terhadap permohonan) [2006] 7 CLJ
519
Ong Lian Chee v. Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja
(Employees provident fund - Withdrawal - Withdrawal of contributions) [2006] 7 CLJ
530
Technointan Holding Sdn Bhd v. Tetuan Tan Kim Siong & Teh Hong Jet
(Civil procedure - Striking out - Application for) [2006] 7 CLJ
541
The Co-operative Central Bank Ltd v. Dr S Balakrishnan Shanmugam & Anor;
Ledchumanan Nagappan Alias Athmanantha Swami (Third Parties)
(Civil procedure - Parties - Third party proceedings) [2006] 7 CLJ
549
SUBJECT INDEX
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Exercise of judicial functions - Jurisdiction - Social Security Appellate Board -
Whether lacked jurisdiction to determine invalidity question - Whether decision made by
medical board and appellate medical board - Ketua Pengarah, Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial
v. Rahim Darus - Employees' Social Security Act 1969, ss. 33(2), 84
Mary Pushpam Savarimuthu v. Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial
(Raus Sharif J) [2006] 7 CLJ
511 [HC]
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Parties - Third party proceedings - Loan agreement - Defendants agents for loan
agreement - Third parties not qualified to borrow directly from plaintiff - Whether
intention was for defendants to borrow from and repay plaintiff - Whether defendants as
agents liable - Contracts Act 1950, s. 183 - Whether third parties to indemnify defendants
- Whether judgment entered for plaintiff
The Co-operative Central Bank Ltd v. Dr S Balakrishnan Shanmugam & Anor;
Ledchumanan Nagappan Alias Athmanantha Swami (Third Parties)
(Abdul Wahab Patail J) [2006] 7 CLJ
549 [HC]
Striking out - Application for - Petition - Petition presented beyond six month
limitation - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 126 - Whether unmaintainable - Whether cause of
action lapsed and extinguished - Whether no reasonable cause of action - Whether petition
rendered scandalous, frivolous and vexatious - Whether an abuse of court process - Rules
of the High Court 1980, O. 18 r. 19(1)(a), (b), (d)
Technointan Holding Sdn Bhd v. Tetuan Tan Kim Siong & Teh Hong Jet
(Low Hop Bing J) [2006] 7 CLJ
541 [HC]
CONTRACT
Agreement - Construction of terms - Intention of parties - Ambiguity - Whether resolved
in favour of plaintiff - Whether plaintiff entitled to 50% of 'brokerage earned' - Whether
plaintiff's claim allowed - Whether defendant's counter claim dismissed
Loy Teck Chye v. Antah Sedgwick Chartered Insurance Brokers Sdn Bhd
(Abdul Wahab Patail J) [2006] 7 CLJ
485 [HC]
Loan - Agreement - Defendant agents for loan agreement - Third parties - Third parties
not qualified to borrow directly from plaintiff - Whether intention was for defendants to
borrow from and repay plaintiff - Whether defendants as agents liable - Contracts Act
1950, s. 183 - Whether third parties to indemnify defendants - Whether judgment entered
for plaintiff
The Co-operative Central Bank Ltd v. Dr S Balakrishnan Shanmugam & Anor;
Ledchumanan Nagappan Alias Athmanantha Swami (Third Parties)
(Abdul Wahab Patail J) [2006] 7 CLJ
549 [HC]
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND
Withdrawal - Withdrawal of contributions - Akta Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja 1991, s.
54(1) - Right to withdraw - Whether accrued on death of member - Date of death - Whether a
determining factor - Payment of additional amount - Whether plaintiff entitled to RM30,000
as additional amount payable under s. 58(1) Akta Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja 1991 -
Whether amended fifth schedule applicable to plaintiff - Whether interpretation adopted by
defendant would cause injustice and inequality before the law
Ong Lian Chee v. Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja
(Noor Azian Shaari JC) [2006] 7 CLJ
530 [HC]
LABOUR LAW
Social security - Invalidity pension - Application for - Whether employee an invalid -
Whether to be decided solely by medical board and appellate medical board - Whether Social
Security Appellate Board has jurisdiction and power to review appeal by aggrieved party
over decision of Medical Board or Appellate Medical Board - Ketua Pengarah, Pertubuhan
Keselamatan Sosial v. Rahim Darus - Employees' Social Security Act 1969, ss. 33(2), 84
Mary Pushpam Savarimuthu v. Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial
(Raus Sharif J) [2006] 7 CLJ
511 [HC]
INDEKS PERKARA
PROSEDUR SIVIL
Penghakiman terus - Rayuan terhadap permohonan - Kegagalan membayar hutang plaintif -
Sama ada penjamin harus membayar apabila peminjam gagal - Sama ada tuntutan plaintif
pramasa - Polisi kepentingan awam - Sama ada alasan yang hambar - Isu-isu dibangkitkan -
Sama ada mempunyai merit - Sama ada perlu dibicarakan
Meiden Electric Engineering Sdn Bhd lwn. Mtrans Holdings Sdn Bhd
(Wan Adnan Muhamad H) [2006] 7 CLJ
519 [HC]
CASE OF THE WEEK
DR MOHD NASIR HASHIM v. MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA
CRIMINAL LAW: Dangerous drugs - Trafficking in dangerous drug - Chemical test - Sufficiency of samples for analysis - Whether minimum of 10% of drug must be taken therefor - Loo Kia Meng v. PP & Leong Bon Huat v. PP - Whether no longer good law - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, ss. 37(j), 39B(1)(a), 39B(2)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Jurisdiction of court - Federal Court - Exercise of power of review - Power to interfere to prevent injustice or abuse of process of court - Principles - Rules of the Federal Court 1995, r. 137
CLJ Bulletin
To Subscribe/Unsubscribe go to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 CLJ Legal Network Sdn
Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone:
603-4270-5400 Fax No : 603-4270 5401 & 603-4270 5402