Legal Network Series

[2013] 1 LNS 135	SYARIKAT ROMA & SATU LAGI lwn. MOHAMAD SHUKRI HAMID	GANTI RUGI: Kecederaan diri - Kos penjagaan - Penjagaan di pusat jagaan - Kecederaan lumpuh - Sama ada terdapat keperluan untuk penjagaan di pusat jagaan - Sama ada plaintif wajar diberikan ganti rugi kos penjagaan di pusat jagaan GANTI RUGI: Kecederaan diri - Kehilangan pendapatan - Kecederaan lumpuh - Keadaan kesihatan sebelum kemalangan - Sama ada plaintif telah berada dalam keadaan yang sihat sebelum kemalangan - Sama ada ganti rugi kehilangan pendapatan wajar diberikan berdasarkan keadaan kesihatan sebelum kemalangan PROSEDUR SIVIL: Pliding - Fakta yang tidak diplidkan - Ganti rugi - Kehilangan pendapatan - Sama ada terdapat keperluan untuk menyatakan secara spesifik pekerjaan dan pendapatan dalam tuntutan ganti rugi kehilangan pendapatan - Sama ada keadaan kesihatan sebelum kemalangan harus diplidkan
[2013] 1 LNS 1217	KEJURUTERAAN LETRIK MAN HOE SDN BHD v. MAX-BENEFIT SDN BHD & ANOR; CERGAS TEGAS SDN BHD (DALAM LIKUIDASI), LIBERTY WONDER SDN BHD & TOW LIN FOOK (APPLICANTS)	CIVIL PROCEDURE: Intervener - Application for - Leave to intervene and be a party to proceedings - Whether Second applicant could rely on O. 15 r. 6(2)(b) of Rules of Court 2012 (RC) or s. 274 of the Companies Act 1965 (CA) - Whether issue involved fundamental question of locus standi of Second applicant - Whether right to take action must first be given by substantive law ie, s. 274 of the CA before Second applicant could use procedural law ie, O. 15 r. 6(2)(b) of RC to move the Court to enforce that right - Whether Second applicant had such right when it was not the liquidator, contributory or creditor of the company concerned STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: Canons of construction - Generalia specialibus non derogant - Specific law must prevail over general law - Whether provisions of s. 274 of the CA must take precedence over O. 15 r. 6(2)(b) of RC - Distinction between procedural and substantive laws and its applicability - Whether procedural law of O. 15 r. 6(2)(b) of RC relied by the Second applicant could be preferred over the substantive law of s. 274 of the CA that limited the parties having the right to apply - Whether right to take action must first be given by the substantive law regarding present application before Second applicant could use the procedural law to move the Court to enforce that right
[2013] 1 LNS 1342	NATIONAL UNION OF BANK EMPLOYEES v. NOORZEELA LAMIN & SATU LAGI KES	TORT: Defamation - Defamatory statements - Comments against plaintiff and plaintiff's National Executive Council members on Facebook and in a leaflet entitled 'MAYNEU Maybank Non Executive Union" – 1st defendant admitted publishing the comments on her Facebook page - Whether any necessity for plaintiff to prove the existence of the comments - Whether Facebook comments referred to plaintiff and plaintiff's Exco and whether they were defamatory - Both defendants denied publishing the Offending Leaflet but admitted distributing the leaflets to third parties - Whether there was publication of the leaflets by the defendants - Whether contents of the Offending Leaflets were defamatory and referred to plaintiff and its Exco TORT: Defamation - Defences - Justification - Failure to produce any proof to support the defamatory statement - Whether defendants had to do more than merely say that source of their information was from the NUBE website - Whether defendants proved there was justification for their statement - Whether defence of fair comment and qualified privilege available to the defendants TORT: Defamation - Damages - Leaflets - Words alleged dishonesty, misuse of funds for personal benefit, non-compliance with the Constitution and Rules of the plaintiff - Whether defamatory words had the effect of damaging plaintiff's reputation - Whether extremely serious and damaging for a Union which was holding itself out as representing and taking care of the interests of its union members - Whether lowered the esteem of the plaintiff in their members' eyes and subjected plaintiff and its Exco to hatred and contempt
[2014] 1 LNS 183	MAHDI HASAN v. AHMAD ZAHID HAMIDI	ELECTION: Petition - Filing of - Alleged failure to comply with s. 38 of the Election Offences Act 1954 (EOA) as the Petition was not presented within 28 days period of limitation - Interpretation of s. 38(1)(a) EOA - Whether words "aforesaid date" referred to the "...date of publication of the result in the Gazette" - Whether said section only applied to an act of corruption that took place after the publication of the result of the election in the Gazette - Whether the proviso and the 28 days after the date of payment or act only applied if the act of corrupt practice was completed after publication of the election results - Whether the Election Petition was presented within the time prescribed ELECTION: Petition - Filing of - Failure to plead - Allegation of corrupt practice carried out indirectly by one R. Supramaniam on behalf of respondent - Non-compliance of mandatory provisions of r. 4(1)(b) and 4(4) of the Election Petition Rules requiring petitioner to state the facts and grounds to sustain the prayers sought - Failure to show nexus between R. Supramaniam and respondent as a candidate - Failure to state whether alleged corrupt practice was with respondent's consent or knowledge - Whether failure to state essential ingredients in s. 32(c) Election Offences Act 1954 with clarity was a fundamental flaw in the Petition - Whether facts pleaded sufficient to sustain prayer that non-compliance affected the result of the election - Whether petition defective and invalid ELECTION: Petition - Filing of - Allegation of corrupt practice - S. 32(c) Election Offences Act 1954 (EOA) providing that the election could be rendered void if proved illegal practice was committed in connection with the election by the candidate or with his knowledge or consent or by any agent of the candidate - Absence of an express definition of 'candidate' in the EOA - Whether definition of word 'candidate' in the Elections Act 1958 applicable to the EOA - Alleged 'corrupt practice' occurred on 19.4.2013 whereas nomination day was on 20.4.2013 - Whether respondent was a candidate when purported act done – Whether s. 32(c) EOA applicable
[2014] 1 LNS 433	P T VISION RENEWABLE FUELS v. EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF MALAYSIA BERHAD	CONTRACT: Termination - Validity - Claim for wrongful termination of Letter of Offer (LO) - Decision of plaintiff to change location of Project and to increase its capacity - Plaintiff's departure from clear terms of the LO - Whether tantamount to a refusal by plaintiff to honour and fulfill the terms and conditions in the LO - Whether changes made by plaintiff were a counter-offer and s. 40 of the Contracts Act 1950 applied - Whether plaintiff breached the terms and conditions of the LO – Whether revocation warranted - Whether LO came to an end when plaintiff unilaterally changed the terms and/or inserted new terms CONTRACT: Estoppel - Representation - Clause 29 prohibited plaintiff from pursuing its remedies such as damages for breach of contract in the event the Letter of Offer (LO) was rejected - Whether parties could contract out of the Contracts Act 1950 - Plaintiff had agreed to term giving discretion to defendant to revoke the LO if found that the granting of the Facility was prejudicial to defendant's interest - Whether Clause 29 of the LO was rightfully exercised - Whether plaintiff estopped from challenging the validity of the revocation CONTRACT: Misrepresentation - Rescission - Whether there was any reliance - Elements of misrepresentations involved in the dealings with defendant - Whether plaintiff caused defendant to be induced to issue the Letter of Offer (LO) to part-finance the Project by these misrepresentations - Whether plaintiff breached its duty of care to the defendant by making those misrepresentations - Whether LO was vitiated by misrepresentations

CLJ 2014 Volume 8 (Part 8)

COURT

SC India

Aveek Sarkar And Another v. State Of West Bengal And Others
KSP Radhakrishnan, DR AK Sikri JJ
(Criminal Law - Penal Code, 1860 - S. 292 - Obscenity – What constitutes - Test for determination of obscenity - Community standard test applicable) [2014] 8 CLJ 961 [SC India]

COURT OF APPEAL

Foo Yee Construction Sdn Bhd v. Vijayan Sinnapan
Alizatul Khair Osman, Abdul Aziz Rahim, Varghese George JJCA
(Contract; Civil Procedure - Building contract - Breach) [2014] 8 CLJ 979 [CA]

Matang Plastik & Metal Work Industries Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Daimler Chrysler Malaysia Sdn Bhd & Ors
Abdul Malik Ishak, Linton Albert, Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JJCA
(Contract; Evidence; Sale Of Goods - Misrepresentation) [2014] 8 CLJ 998 [CA]

Mohd Toufic Ozeir v. Desa Hatchery Sdn Bhd
Hishamudin Mohd Yunus, Lim Yee Lan, Mohd Zawawi Salleh JJCA
(Bankruptcy - Proceedings - Failure of Deputy Registrar to accord parties right to be heard) [2014] 8 CLJ 1019 [CA]

Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka lwn. Prof Madya Md Noah Jamal
Abu Samah Nordin, Zaharah Ibrahim, Abdul Aziz Rahim HHMR
(Undang-Undang Buruh - Pekerjaan - Penamatan) [2014] 8 CLJ 1034 [CA]

Westech Sdn Bhd v. Thong Weng Lock
Syed Ahmad Helmy, Abdul Wahab Patail, Abdul Aziz Rahim JJCA
(Company Law; Civil Procedure - Winding up - Voluntary winding up) [2014] 8 CLJ 1050 [CA]

HIGH COURT

PP lwn. Muhammad Syamir Kasmani
Samsudin Hassan PK
(Undang-Undang Jenayah; Keterangan - Kesalahan rogol) [2014] 8 CLJ 1071 [HC]

Upapayu Management Sdn Bhd v. Ramaloo Sivanjalam
Lim Chong Fong JC
(Contract; Tort; Employment - Damages - Whether complaints proved) [2014] 8 CLJ 1088 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

BANKRUPTCY

Notice - Setting aside - Proceedings - Failure of Deputy Registrar to accord parties right to be heard - Whether fundamental breach of rules of natural justice - Decision to set aside bankruptcy notice without hearing merits of application - Whether serious miscarriage of justice - Judgment creditor had earlier made decision not to proceed with bankruptcy proceedings - Conduct of judgment creditor in initiating fresh bankruptcy proceedings - Whether amounted to abuse of process of court
Mohd Toufic Ozeir v. Desa Hatchery Sdn Bhd
(Hishamudin Mohd Yunus, Lim Yee Lan, Mohd Zawawi Salleh JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 1019 [CA]

Proceedings - Bankruptcy notice - Application to set aside bankruptcy notice - Failure of Deputy Registrar to accord parties right to be heard - Whether fundamental breach of rules of natural justice - Decision to set aside bankruptcy notice without hearing merits of application - Whether serious miscarriage of justice - Judgment creditor had earlier made decision not to proceed with bankruptcy proceedings - Conduct of judgment creditor in initiating fresh bankruptcy proceedings - Whether amounted to abuse of process of court
Mohd Toufic Ozeir v. Desa Hatchery Sdn Bhd
(Hishamudin Mohd Yunus, Lim Yee Lan, Mohd Zawawi Salleh JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 1019 [CA]

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Application for leave to appeal - Proceedings against company - Appeal to Court of Appeal - Company's winding up commenced before appeal could be heard - Whether leave of court required - Whether appeal struck off by Court of Appeal for want of leave - Application to set aside order - Subsequent filing of leave to prosecute appeal - Whether earlier order sealed and perfected - Whether a final order - Doctrine of res judicata - Whether applied - Whether there was inordinate delay in filing for leave of court - Companies Act 1965, s. 263(2)
Westech Sdn Bhd v. Thong Weng Lock
(Syed Ahmad Helmy, Abdul Wahab Patail, Abdul Aziz Rahim JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 1050 [CA]

Specific performance - Building contract - Construction of bungalow 85% completed - Works could not be completed due to financial issues and problems with subcontractors - High Court held that contractor had committed breach of contract and ordered to pay damages - Whether case pleaded - Whether there was termination for non-performance pleaded
Foo Yee Construction Sdn Bhd v. Vijayan Sinnapan
(Alizatul Khair Osman, Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim, Varghese George JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 979 [CA]

COMPANY LAW

Winding up - Proceedings against company - Voluntary winding up - Leave of court - Appeal to Court of Appeal - Company's winding up commenced before appeal could be heard - Whether leave of court required - Whether relief sought capable of being obtained under winding up procedure - Whether there was inordinate delay in filing for leave of court - Companies Act 1965, s. 263(2)
Westech Sdn Bhd v. Thong Weng Lock
(Syed Ahmad Helmy, Abdul Wahab Patail, Abdul Aziz Rahim JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 1050 [CA]

Winding up - Voluntary winding up - Proceedings against company - Whether leave of court required - Whether s. 263(2) Companies Act 1965 applies to voluntary winding up
Westech Sdn Bhd v. Thong Weng Lock
(Syed Ahmad Helmy, Abdul Wahab Patail, Abdul Aziz Rahim JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 1050 [CA]

CONTRACT

Building contract - Breach - Construction of bungalow 85% completed - Works could not be completed due to financial issues and problems with subcontractors - High Court held that contractor had committed breach of contract and ordered to pay damages - Whether case pleaded - Whether trial judge erred
Foo Yee Construction Sdn Bhd v. Vijayan Sinnapan
(Alizatul Khair Osman, Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim, Varghese George JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 979 [CA]

Damages - Employment - Aircraft maintenance engineer employed by company to maintain aircrafts under letter of appointment - Dissatisfaction over engineer's performance - Termination of engineer's services - Allegations that engineer failed to perform duties expected of him under letter of employment - Whether complaints proved - Claim for liquidated and damages - Whether substantiated
Upapayu Management Sdn Bhd v. Ramaloo Sivanjalam
(Lim Chong Fong jC) [2014] 8 CLJ 1088 [HC]

Misrepresentation - Allegation of - Purchaser bought car based on representations that car was fit for its purpose - Whether car of merchantable quality and fit for purpose bought - Whether misrepresentation established
Matang Plastik & Metal Work Industries Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Daimler Chrysler Malaysia Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Linton Albert, Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 998 [CA]

CRIMINAL LAW

Penal Code, 1860 - S. 292 - Obscenity - What constitutes - Test for determination of obscenity - Community standard test applicable - Hicklin, (1868) LR 3 QB 360, test not the correct test - Obscenity, held, should be determined from point of view of average person and in context of contemporary mores and national standards, as concept of obscenity keeps on changing with changing social values - Message which offending object intended to convey is significant - Photograph of a nude/semi-nude woman by itself cannot be obscene - Obscenity would depend upon particular posture and background in which nude woman is depicted - Looked at as a whole, it should tend to deprave and corrupt the mind and excite lustful sexual passion so as to constitute offence under S. 292 - Publication in newspaper of picture of a nude white-skinned man (renowned German tennis player) standing close to his dark-skinned nude/semi-nude fiancée (actress) and man covering breast of fiancée with his hands, followed by an article conveying message to people against practice of apartheid/racism and that love triumphs over hatred - Held, photograph not obscene - Hence no offence committed under S. 292 - Magistrate erred in initiating proceedings under S. 292 IPC and S. 4 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act without proper application of mind - High Court also erred in refusing to quash the proceedings in exercise of power under S. 482 CrPC - Proceedings quashed - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - S. 482 - Crimes Against Women and Children - Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - S. 4 - Constitution of India, Arts. 19(1)(a) & (2)
Aveek Sarkar And Another v. State Of West Bengal And Others
(KSP Radhakrishnan, DR AK Sikri JJ) [2014] 8 CLJ 961 [SC India]

EMPLOYMENT

Contract of service - Termination - Aircraft maintenance engineer employed by company to maintain aircrafts under letter of appointment - Dissatisfaction over engineer's performance - Termination of engineer's services - Allegations that engineer failed to perform duties expected of him under letter of employment - Whether engineer fairly dismissed as employee
Upapayu Management Sdn Bhd v. Ramaloo Sivanjalam
(Lim Chong Fong jC) [2014] 8 CLJ 1088 [HC]

EVIDENCE

Burden of proof - Doctrine of res ipsa loquitur - Whether doctrine applied - Whether burden to prove negligence shifted from plaintiff to defendants - Whether res ipsa loquitur could be raised against parties who are not in law responsible for each other
Matang Plastik & Metal Work Industries Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Daimler Chrysler Malaysia Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Linton Albert, Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 998 [CA]

SALE OF GOODS

Motor car - Claim against car dealer - Representations by seller that car was fit for its purpose - Car constantly broke down and subsequently caught fire - Whether car fit for purpose and of acceptable quality - Whether seller breached implied conditions and/or guarantees under Consumer Protection Act 1999 - Consumer Protection Act 1999, s. 32
Matang Plastik & Metal Work Industries Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Daimler Chrysler Malaysia Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Abdul Malik Ishak, Linton Albert, Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JJCA) [2014] 8 CLJ 998 [CA]

TORT

Negligence - Damages - Aircraft maintenance engineer employed by company to maintain aircrafts under letter of appointment - Dissatisfaction over engineer's performance - Termination of engineer's services - Allegations that engineer failed to perform duties expected of him under letter of employment - Whether complaints proved - Whether engineer negligent in carrying out maintenance duties
Upapayu Management Sdn Bhd v. Ramaloo Sivanjalam
(Lim Chong Fong jC) [2014] 8 CLJ 1088 [HC]

INDEKS PERKARA

KETERANGAN

Keterangan sokongan - Rogol - Keterangan sokongan berkecuali untuk membuktikan fakta rogol - Sama ada terdapat keterangan sokongan berkecuali - Sama ada terdapat keterangan untuk mengaitkan tertuduh dengan kesalahan - Kanun Keseksaan,
s. 376(1)
PP lwn. Muhammad Syamir Kasmani
(Samsudin Hassan PK) [2014] 8 CLJ 1071 [HC]

Saksi - Kebolehpercayaan - Percanggahan dalam keterangan saksi-saksi - Sama ada keterangan boleh dipercayai - Sama ada keterangan mangsa konsisten dengan keterangan saksi-saksi - Sama ada selamat untuk bergantung kepada keterangan saksi-saksi
PP lwn. Muhammad Syamir Kasmani
(Samsudin Hassan PK) [2014] 8 CLJ 1071 [HC]

UNDANG-UNDANG BURUH

Pekerjaan - Penamatan - Pelantikan Professor Madya sebagai Timbalan Dekan oleh universiti - Sama ada pelantikan berdasarkan kontrak - Sama ada pelantikan boleh ditamatkan pada bila-bila masa - Sama ada penamatan sebagai Timbalan Dekan menjejaskan pelantikan sebagai Profesor Madya - Sama ada Timbalan Dekan mempunyai harapan sah bahawa jawatannya akan terus kekal sehingga tamat tempoh kontraknya sebagai Profesor Madya - Sama ada seorang penjawat awam - Sama ada penamatan perkhidmatan sah
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka lwn. Prof Madya Md Noah Jamal
(Abu Samah Nordin, Zaharah Ibrahim, Abdul Aziz Rahim HHMR) [2014] 8 CLJ 1034 [CA]

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH

Kanun Keseksaan - Seksyen 376 - Kesalahan rogol - Elemen-elemen kesalahan - Sama ada berjaya dibuktikan - Sama ada keterangan saksi-saksi boleh dipercayai - Sama ada keterangan mangsa konsisten dengan keterangan saksi-saksi - Sama ada terdapat keterangan sokongan berkecuali untuk menyokong fakta rogol - Sama ada tertuduh berjaya menimbulkan keraguan munasabah terhadap kes pendakwaan
PP lwn. Muhammad Syamir Kasmani
(Samsudin Hassan PK) [2014] 8 CLJ 1071 [HC]

ARTICLE

Legal Network Series Article(s)

1. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
    Fashion Apparel - Design or Copyright Protection?* ^{[Read excerpt]}
    by: SIM SOOK ENG [2014] 1 LNS(A) cxvii

2. MEKANISME PROSES DAN PROSEDUR DALAMAN PENJELASAN
    CEK DALAM SISTEM PERBANKAN ISLAM DI MALAYSIA:
    TINJAUAN ISU OPERASI PERBANKAN DARI PERSPEKTIF
    AL-WASA'IL AL-SYAR'IYYA* ^{[Read excerpt]}
    by: MOHAMAD NABIL MOHAMAD SHUKRI⁺, HASLEENDA ONN⁺,
          AHMAD TARMIDZI AL-MUTTAQI⁺, MUHAMMAD HADI ABDULLAH⁺ [2014] 1 LNS(A) cxix

LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number	Title	Date coming into force	Repealing
ACT 763	Yayasan Guru Tun Hussein Onn Act 2014	Not Yet In Force	-Nil-
ACT 762	Goods And Services Tax Act 2014	1 July 2014 - Parts I, II, IV, VI and XVI, ss 10, 11, 17, 18, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 44, 50, 56, 59, 61, 64, 65, 69, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 160, 163, 183, 184 and 197, the First Schedule and Second Schedule to the Act; 1 April 2015 - Parts IX, XIII, XVII and XVIII, ss 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51, 52, 53, 57, 58, 60, 62, 63, 66, 67, 68, 70, 84, 88, 89, 90, 91, 94, 98, 106, 108, 109, 110, 122, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 161, 162, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195 and 196, the Third Schedule and Fourth Schedule to the Act [PU(B) 319/2014]	-Nil-
ACT 761	Finance Act 2014	See s 3 for the Income Tax Act; s 33 for the Stamp Act; s 36 for the Petroleum (Income Tax) Act; s 44 for the Real Property Gains Tax Act and s 50 for the Labuan Business Activity Tax Act	-Nil-
ACT 760	Fees (Department Of Museums Malaysia) (Validation) Act 2014	1 January 1991 to 11 June 2012	-Nil-
ACT 759	Islamic Financial Services Act 2013	30 June 2013 [PU(B) 277/2013] - except para(s) 1 to 10 of Schedule 9 and para(s) 13 to 19 of Schedule 9	-Nil-

Amending Acts

Number	Title	Date coming into force	Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1468	Promotion Of Investments (Amendment) Act 2014	See section 1(1) to 1(33) of the Act	ACT 327
ACT A1467	Anti-Money Laundering And Anti-Terrorism Financing (Amendment) Act 2014	8 August 2014 - s 78 only; 1 September 2014 except ss 22 and 26 - 1 October 2014 [PU(B) 400/2014]	ACT 613
ACT A1466	Supplementary Supply (2014) Act 2014	25 July 2014	-Nil-
ACT A1465	Private Higher Educational Institutions (Amendment) Act 2014	25 July 2014	ACT 555
ACT A1464	Price Control And Anti-Profiteering (Amendment) Act 2014	1 September 2014 [PU(B) 399/2014]	ACT 723

PU(A)

Number	Title	Date of Publication	Date coming into force	Principal/Amending Act No
PU(A) 311/2014	Development Financial Institutions (Small Medium Enterprise Development Bank Malaysia Berhad) (Exemption) Order 2014	17 November 2014	18 November 2014	ACT 618
PU(A) 310/2014	Labuan Financial Services And Securities (Amendment) Regulations 2014	17 November 2014	18 November 2014	PU(A) 416/2010
PU(A) 309/2014	Labuan Companies (Amendment) Regulations 2014	17 November 2014	18 November 2014	PU(A) 414/2010
PU(A) 308/2014	Labuan Islamic Financial Services And Securities (Amendment) Regulations 2014	17 November 2014	18 November 2014	PU(A) 417/2010
PU(A) 307/2014	Order Under Section 5	14 November 2014	14 November 2014	ACT 335

PU(B)

Number	Title	Date of Publication	Date coming into force	Principal/Amending Act No
PU(B) 511/2014	Vacations Of The Federal Court	17 November 2014	1 June 2015 to 12 June 2015 and 14 December 2015 to 31 December 2015	PU(A) 150/1996
PU(B) 510/2014	Declaration Of Commencement And Duration Of Vacations Of The Court Of Appeal	17 November 2014	1 June 2015 to 12 June 2015 and 14 December 2015 to 31 December 2015	PU(A) 539/1994
PU(B) 509/2014	Appointment Of Inquiry Officer Under Section 8	14 November 2014	14 November 2014	ACT 297
PU(B) 508/2014	Appointment Of Commissioner Of Heritage	14 November 2014	15 June 2014 until 14 June 2016	ACT 645
PU(B) 507/2014	Appointment And Revocation Of Appointment Of Director General For Control Of Padi And Rice	14 November 2014	15 October 2014	ACT 522

To view previous issues of the CLJ Bulletin, Click here
If you no longer wish to receive this email in the future, you may unsubscribe.

CLJ Bulletin: Copyright © 1997 - 2014 CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com Phone: 03-42705421(DL) 03-42705400(GL) Fax No: 03-42705402